Comp-neuro
By thread
comp-neuro@lists.cnsorg.org
By month
Messages by month
- ----- 2026 -----
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2025 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- 14 participants
- 7397 messages
Two fully funded PhD positions (computational neuroscience and AI)
by Jie Mei
* apologies for cross-posting *
Dear colleagues,
The Wiring, Neuromodeling and Brain Lab at IT:U Interdisciplinary Transformation University Austria is looking for two PhD students to work on neuromodulation-aware artificial intelligence. We are interested in (1) the role of individual neuromodulators (e.g., dopamine, serotonin, and acetylcholine) in initiating and implementing diverse biological and cognitive functions, (2) how competition and cooperation among neuromodulators enrich single neuromodulator computations, and (3) how multi-neuromodulator dynamics can be translated into learning rules for more flexible, robust, and adaptive learning in artificial neural networks (ANNs).
We are looking for two motivated PhD students with a strong interest in the intersection of neuroscience, computational modeling, and AI. Ideal candidates will have completed or be in the final stages of a master’s degree in computer science, mathematics, physics, computational neuroscience, or other relevant fields. Programming skills, a solid understanding of computational modeling, and the ability to work and think independently are required. Experience with deep learning frameworks such as TensorFlow and PyTorch is preferred. Working knowledge of spiking neural networks and compartmental models is a plus.
Start date: Jan-Mar 2025. Apply by Nov 30, 2024: https://it-u.at/en/research/research-groups/computational-neuroscience/
For more information, please visit: https://majorjiemei.wixsite.com/wnblab
If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Jie Mei (jie.mei(a)it-u.at)
Best regards
Jie Mei
Assistant Professor for Computational Neuroscience
[Ein Bild, das Schwarz, Dunkelheit enthält. Automatisch generierte Beschreibung]
Altenberger Straße 66c
Science Park 4 | OG 2
4040 Linz | Austria
ATU79114879
www.it-u.at<https://www.it-u.at/>
+43 676 / 851307 254
jie.<mailto:vorname.nachname@it-u.at>mei(a)it-u.at<mailto:vorname.nachname@it-u.at>
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie unter https://it-u.at/en/privacy/.
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich und kann rechtlich besonders geschützte Informationen beinhalten. Wenn Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger sind, dürfen Sie diese E-Mail oder die angeschlossenen Dateien weder bearbeiten, verwenden, weitergeben noch reproduzieren. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, ersuchen wir Sie höflich, sich sofort mit uns ins Einvernehmen zu setzen und die E-Mail und sämtliche angeschlossene Dateien zu löschen.
You can find our Privacy Policy here https://it-u.at/en/privacy/.
The content of this email is confidential and may also contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you may not process, use, transmit or reproduce this email or any enclosed attachments. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and any enclosed attachments from your system.
Nov. 5, 2024
Tenured or Tenure-Track Faculty Position, Fall 2025 - Computational Neuroscience- UT Austin
by Weatherly, Christopher J
Last day to apply: Dec. 3.
https://apply.interfolio.com/156045
The Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences and the Department of Neuroscience at The University of Texas at Austin have an opening for a tenured or tenure-track faculty position beginning Fall 2025 in the area of Computational Neuroscience. We are interested in candidates with expertise in the development and use of AI and machine learning approaches to solve questions in fundamental and translational neuroscience. Examples include analysis of large-scale, multimodal neural and behavioral recordings, biophysical modeling of molecular and cellular interactions across time scales, and use of digital twins for real time predictive analytics of behavior, circuit function, and molecular interactions. Expertise in fundamental and applied machine learning and artificial intelligence for gaining insights into neuropsychiatric disease states is of particular interest. This search is being conducted jointly between the Oden Institute and the Department of Neuroscience as one of several faculty lines committed to expanding the development of AI for Science and Scientific Machine Learning at UT Austin. The successful candidate will have half of their teaching duties in the Oden Institute’s Computational Science, Engineering and Mathematics graduate program and half in the Department of Neuroscience. This position is open to applicants at all ranks: assistant, associate, and full professor, including the possibility of appointment as a chaired professor for candidates with exceptional qualifications. For more information about the Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, please visit https://www.oden.utexas.edu<https://www.oden.utexas.edu/>. For more information on the Department of Neuroscience, please visit https://neuroscience.utexas.edu/.
Qualifications
Candidates must have a Ph.D. degree in neuroscience, molecular biology, biochemistry, engineering, biophysics, computational science or a related field. In addition to the ability to teach neuroscience classes at the undergraduate and graduate levels, the successful candidate must be qualified to teach graduate classes in computational science, engineering and mathematics. The successful candidate will be expected to create undergraduate and graduate learning environments that address the needs of students from a variety of backgrounds, with differing learning styles and abilities. Further, the successful applicant will be expected to develop an externally sponsored research program, mentor graduate students, collaborate with other faculty, and be involved in service to the university and profession.
Application Instructions
Interested applicants should submit the following materials: (1) a cover letter, (2) curriculum vitae, (3) research statement (max four pages), (4) teaching and mentoring statement (max three pages), and (5) either three letters of reference (candidates for an assistant or associate professor position) or the names of three references (candidates for a full professor position).
Candidates should address their submission to the Computational Neuroscience Faculty Search Committee. Review of applications will begin November 11, 2024, and will continue until an appropriate candidate is identified. We anticipate virtual interviews in December and in-person campus interviews in January 2025.
The successful candidate will be required to complete an Employment Eligibility Verification form and provide documents to verify identity and eligibility to work in the USA. A security sensitive background check will be conducted on the applicant selected.
Please address questions to either co-chair of the Computational Neuroscience Faculty Search Committee: Dr. Robert O. Messing (romessing(a)austin.utexas.edu<mailto:romessing@austin.utexas.edu>) or Dr. David Paydarfar (david.paydarfar(a)austin.utexas.edu<mailto:david.paydarfar@austin.utexas.edu>). ** For application questions, contact Ruth Park (ruth.park(a)oden.utexas.edu<mailto:ruth.park@oden.utexas.edu>).
Nov. 5, 2024
EMBO Course “Quantifying Astrocyte Physiology by Models from Genome to Circuits,” April 10–11, 2025, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
by De Pitta, Maurizio
Dear colleagues,
Please share and disseminate through your network.
On behalf of all the organizers, I am happy to announce that registrations are now open for the EMBO Course on “Quantifying Astrocyte Physiology by Models from Genome to Circuits” hosted by the University of Padua, in Padua, Italy, on April 10–11, 2025
https://sites.google.com/view/embo-satellite-meeting/home
The course is a Satellite Event of the EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems,” which will follow in nearby Venice a couple of days later (April 14–18, 2025).
The EMBO Course “Quantifying Astrocyte Physiology by Models from Genome to Circuits” is a two-day intensive course aimed at teaching essential modeling approaches to harness astrocyte biology revolving around four main themes such as (i) astrocyte genomics, (ii) intracellular calcium signaling, (iii) tripartite synapses, (iv) neuron-astrocyte networks.
The course is open to researchers of any level in the Academia and Industry.
Registration Policy
Attendance to the Course is limited to 50 participants due to limited seating.
Registrants that are also planning to attend the EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems” should register through this latter’s website: https://meetings.embo.org/event/25-astrocytes
People who will not be selected to attend the EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems” can still opt to participate in the course by registering through the course website: https://sites.google.com/view/embo-satellite-meeting/home
Thank you for your consideration.
Maurizio De Pitta
-----
Maurizio DE PITTA
Principal Investigator
Neuron-Glia Interactions Lab (NGILab)
Krembil Research Institute, 4KD-509
60 Leonard Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 0S8, CA
+1.416.603.5800 ext. 3290
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.
If you feel you have received an email from UHN of a commercial nature and would like to be removed from the sender's mailing list please do one of the following:
(1) Follow any unsubscribe process the sender has included in their email
(2) Where no unsubscribe process has been included, reply to the sender and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you require additional information please go to our UHN Newsletters and Mailing Lists page.
Please note that we are unable to automatically unsubscribe individuals from all UHN mailing lists.
Patient Consent for Email:
UHN patients may provide their consent to communicate with UHN about their care using email. All electronic communication carries some risk. Please visit the UHN website and search “Using email to Communicate with Your UHN Health Care Team” to learn about the risks of electronic communication and how to protect your privacy. You may withdraw your consent to receive emails from UHN at any time. Please contact your care provider, if you do not wish to receive emails from UHN.
Nov. 4, 2024
EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems,” April 14–18, 2025, Venice International University, Venice, Italy
by De Pitta, Maurizio
Dear colleagues,
Please share and disseminate through your network.
On behalf of all the organizers, I am happy to announce that registrations are now open for the EMBO Workshop on “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems,” which will take place at the exclusive setting of the Venice International University on San Servolo Island in Venice (Italy) on April 14–18, 2025.
https://meetings.embo.org/event/25-astrocytes
The EMBO Workshop Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems is the first international meeting dedicated to astrocytes. It showcases an exceptional line-up of renowned investigators in the field of astrocyte biology to provide a multidisciplinary, comprehensive view of astrocyte research aimed at spurring research in the field for the next decade.
Participation in the conference is limited to 160 attendees.
The primary selection criterion is the quality of the scientific work. A scientific committee, composed of the Organizers and workshop speakers, will evaluate submitted abstracts based on their relevance to the astrocyte field and alignment with the workshop topics. The presentation of unpublished data is encouraged and will be given priority.
We strongly encourage participation from PhD students and postdocs. Selected abstracts will be chosen for short talks, flash talks, and/or poster sessions.
Registration: To enroll in selections and access the meeting, please pre-register through the website at the end of this message by January 14, 2025.
Confirmed Speakers (in alphabetical order):
Amit Agarwal, Heidelberg University, Germany
Nicola Allen, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, USA
Amaia Arranz, Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Spain
Blanca Díaz Castro, University of Edinburgh, UK
Won-Suk Chung, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea
Laura Civiero, University of Padua, Italy
Carmen Falcone, International School for Advanced Studies, Italy
Tommaso Felin, Italian Institute of Technology, Italy
Fiona Doetsch, University of Basel, Switzerland
Bart de Strooper, University College London, UK
Maurizio De Pittà, Krembil Research Institute, Canada
Blanca Díaz Castro, University of Edinburgh, UK
Carole Escartin, CNRS University of Paris-Saclay, France
Cristina García Cáceres, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Germany
Angela Giangrande, University of Strasbourg, France
Inbal Goshen, The Hebrew University, Israel
Naomi Habib, The Hebrew University, Israel
Dieter Heiland, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Germany
Elly Hol, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, The Netherlands
Matthew Holt, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, Portugal
Dolores Irala, Duke University Medical Center, USA
Stephan Kaeser, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Germany
Baljit Khakh, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Ksenia Kastanenka, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA
Martin Kampmann, University of California, USA
Andràs Lakatos, University of Cambridge, UK
Pierre Magistretti, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia
Keith Murai, McGill University Health Center, Canada
Marta Navarrete, Instituto Cajal CSIC, Spain
Valentin Nägerl, University of Bordeaux, France
Nathalie Rouach, College de France, France
Francisco Quintana, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA
Aiman Saab, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Eduardo Zimmer, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems” Apr 14–18, 2025 Venice (Italy)
https://meetings.embo.org/event/25-astrocytes
Thank you for your consideration of the matter.
Maurizio De Pitta
-----
Maurizio DE PITTA
Principal Investigator
Neuron-Glia Interactions Lab (NGILab)
Krembil Research Institute, 4KD-509
60 Leonard Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 0S8, CA
+1.416.603.5800 ext. 3290
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization.
If you feel you have received an email from UHN of a commercial nature and would like to be removed from the sender's mailing list please do one of the following:
(1) Follow any unsubscribe process the sender has included in their email
(2) Where no unsubscribe process has been included, reply to the sender and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you require additional information please go to our UHN Newsletters and Mailing Lists page.
Please note that we are unable to automatically unsubscribe individuals from all UHN mailing lists.
Patient Consent for Email:
UHN patients may provide their consent to communicate with UHN about their care using email. All electronic communication carries some risk. Please visit the UHN website and search “Using email to Communicate with Your UHN Health Care Team” to learn about the risks of electronic communication and how to protect your privacy. You may withdraw your consent to receive emails from UHN at any time. Please contact your care provider, if you do not wish to receive emails from UHN.
Nov. 4, 2024
[seminar.wwtns] World wide VVTNS series: Wednesday, Wednesday 6, 2024, at 11:00 am EST
by David Hansel
[image: VVTNS.png]
https://www.wwtns.online
<https://streaklinks.com/A9c7PbbpKY7PxB6PaAJWGD3-/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wwtns.on…>
-
on twitter: wwtns@TheoreticalWide
You are cordially invited to the lecture given by
Hannah Choi
Georgia Tech
on the topic of
Unraveling information processing through
functional networks
The lecture will be held on zoom on Wednesday, November 6, 2024, at *11:00
am EST *
To receive the zoom link: https://www.wwtns.online/register-page
*Abstract: *While anatomical connectivity changes slowly through synaptic
learning, the functional connectivity of neurons changes rapidly with
ongoing activity of neurons and their functional interactions. Functional
networks of neurons and neural populations reflect how their interactions
change with behaviors, stimulus types, and internal states. Therefore, the
information propagation across a network can be analyzed through the
varying topological properties of the functional networks. Our study
investigates the functional networks of the visual cortex at both the
single-cell and population levels. Our analyses of functional connectivity
of single neurons, constructed from spiking activity in neural populations
of the visual cortex, reveal local and global network structures shaped by
stimulus complexity. In addition, we propose a new method for inferring
functional interactions between neural populations that preserves
biologically constrained anatomical connectivity and signs. Applying our
method to 2-photon data from the mouse visual cortex, we uncover functional
interactions between cell types and cortical layers, suggesting distinct
pathways for processing expected and unexpected visual information.
*About VVTNS : Launched as the World Wide Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar
(WWTNS) in November 2020 and renamed in homage to Carl van Vreeswijk in
Memoriam (April 20, 2022), Speakers have the occasion to talk about
theoretical aspects of their work which cannot be discussed in a setting
where the majority of the audience consists of experimentalists. The
seminars, **held on Wednesdays at 11 am ET,** are 45-50 min long followed
by a discussion. The talks are recorded with authorization of the speaker
and are available to everybody on our YouTube channel.*
ᐧ
ᐧ
Nov. 3, 2024
Faculty position of AI and psychology/neuroscience - University of Miami
by Mingbo Cai
*Faculty position of Ai and psychology / neuroscience*
The Department of Psychology at the University of Miami invites
applications for a full-time, tenure-eligible, or tenure-track faculty
member to join our department in August 2025. The opening is part of a
College of Arts & Sciences cluster hire dedicated to artificial
intelligence (machine learning). Prospective candidates should use
artificial intelligence as a core approach in their investigations and/or
as a topic of their research. Individuals who also have interests in
computational approaches including advanced quantitative techniques are
encouraged to apply. The specific area of research is open. Area(s) of
focus could include, but are not limited to, basic research on perception,
cognition, affect, neurophysiology, language, behavior, mental health, the
impact of disparities, learning, development, human computer interaction,
deep neural network mechanisms, brain-inspired AI, or computational
cognitive neuroscience. The candidate’s research would complement and
expand current work in the department using large language models to study
naturalistic speech, using machine learning to model emotional
communication, and using computational models to explain both neural
processing and behavior. Candidates will support and advance UM’s mission
to engage in innovative and interdisciplinary AI research across the
college and university.
The Department of Psychology <https://www.psy.miami.edu/> is a vibrant,
collaborative community that includes clinical and psychological sciences
faculty across Adult
<https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/adult-division/>, Cognitive
and Behavioral Neuroscience <https://cbn.psy.miami.edu/>, Child
<https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/child-division/>, and Health
<https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/health-division/> Divisions. The
mission of the Department is to acquire, advance, and disseminate knowledge
within the Psychological and Biobehavioral Sciences, supported through
excellent graduate programs
<https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/doctoral-programs/index.html> and
state-of-the-art facilities. The department values and celebrates cultural
diversity of all kinds and has an active Diversity and Equity Committee
<https://www.psy.miami.edu/about-the-department/dec/index.html>. The
greater Miami community is one of the most ethnically and culturally
diverse metropolitan areas in the country.
Applications will be considered at all ranks. Appointment is expected to
start on August 15, 2025. Candidates must hold a Ph.D. by the appointment
start date.
Applications can be submitted via the UM Careers Website
<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fumiami.wd…>.
Please compile the following documents in *up to five PDFs (each within
5MB) and upload them under the Resume/CV *section of the online
application. If you have difficulties uploading any representative
publications due to size limitations, please email them directly to our
administrative assistant Maria Shah (maria.shah(a)miami.edu)
· Letter of interest
· Current CV
· Research statement
· Teaching statement
· A statement that explains your contributions to diversity, equity,
and inclusion, including comment on mentoring underrepresented populations
· 3 representative publications
· 3-4 references – we will request letters of recommendation for a
final pool of applicants
Review of applications will begin on December 1, 2024 and continue until
the position is filled. Inquiries, requests for information, and
nominations can be sent to the Search Co-Chairs, Aaron Heller (
aheller(a)miami.edu) and Daniel Messinger (dmessinger(a)miami.edu)
*------------------------------*
The University of Miami is an Equal Opportunity Employer – Females,
Minorities, Protected Veterans, and/or Individuals with Disabilities are
encouraged to apply. Applicants and employees are protected from
discrimination based on certain categories protected by Federal law. Click
here <https://www.hr.miami.edu/careers/eo-ada/index.html> for additional
information.
Mingbo Cai
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
University of Miami
Nov. 2, 2024
Reminder Announcement of BrainCriticality 2024 3-day conference Nov 6 - 8, 2024, NIH, USA
by Plenz, Dietmar (NIH/NIMH) [E]
Please post the following reminder for our upcoming conference which was first announced on your listserv on Oct. 5 (see bottom of this email).
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Hybrid Brain Criticality Conference 2024 from Wed, Nov. 6th - Fri, Nov. 8th is just around the corner!
This hybrid meeting will take place at the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA with ~25 speakers over the course of 3 days. Contributions will cover recent developments in the fields of systems neuroscience and collective phenomena in complex systems with focus on the role of criticality and its implications for normal and abnormal brain dynamics.
You can now access the updated conference program, including selected Oral Spotlight presentations, on our website: https://braincriticality.org/<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbraincrit…>.
Zoom Access Link (free):
To join the conference virtually via Zoom, please use this link:
https://nih.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_Nsl-6_QwRWeRI8dyp3emVg#/registr…<https://nih.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_Nsl-6_QwRWeRI8dyp3emVg>
By entering your email, you'll gain direct access to the virtual meeting room when it opens. If you're unable to join immediately, you'll receive an email with a direct access link to use later. This same link will remain valid for the entire conference duration.
We look forward to welcoming you soon!
The Organizers
Dietmar Plenz, Lucilla de Arcangelis, Miguel Angel Muñoz, Mauro Copelli, and Demian Battaglia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thank you very much,
Dietmar Plenz, PhD
Principal Investigator
Section on Critical Brain Dynamics
National Institute of Mental Health
USA
_____________________________________________
From: Plenz, Dietmar (NIH/NIMH) [E]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2024 1:20 PM
To: comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org
Subject: Announcement of BrainCriticality 2024 3-day conference Nov 6 - 8, 2024, NIH, USA
Brain Criticality Hybrid Meeting November 6 - 8 2024 (in person/virtual)
For registration and details see: https://braincriticality.org/<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbraincrit…>
This hybrid meeting will take place at the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA with ~25 speakers over the course of 3 days. Contributions will cover recent developments in the fields of systems neuroscience and collective phenomena in complex systems with focus on the role of criticality and its implications for normal and abnormal brain dynamics.
Dietmar Plenz, Ph.D.
Senior Investigator
Section on Critical Brain Dynamics
National Institute of Mental Health
USA
"Complexity from simple rules"
Nov. 2, 2024
Openings for Postdocs, RAs, and PhD Students in Computational Psychiatry and Neuro-AI (Lin Lab)
by doerlbh@gmail.com
Dear colleagues,
The Lin Lab (Bytes of Minds Lab) at Mount Sinai is actively recruiting Postdoctoral Researchers, PhD Students, and Research Assistants passionate about Computational Psychiatry and Neuro-AI. Led by Dr. Baihan Lin and based within New York’s largest health network, our lab is at the forefront of mental health technology and brain-inspired AI research, combining insights from neuroscience, cognitive science, and machine learning to create adaptive, intelligent systems that can transform mental health care and deepen our understanding of the mind.
Why Join Us?
- Cutting-edge Research: Our work spans neuro-inspired AI, computational psychiatry, brain-computer interfaces, extended realities (XR), social media analysis, wearable technology, and more.
- Interdisciplinary Environment: Engage with advanced neuroscience, machine learning, and cognitive science to create innovative tools for mental health and next-gen neurotechnology.
- Unique Positioning: As part of Mount Sinai’s dynamic research community, we have access to extensive data resources and collaborations within a top-tier hospital network, biggest in NY, and ranked #1 in healthcare AI by Nature.
We invite interested candidates with a drive to explore the frontiers of mind and machine to join us. For more details, visit linlab.org, or apply directly by emailing Dr. Baihan Lin at baihan.lin(a)mssm.edu. US (and especially NYC-based) candidates preferred, though international applicants are welcome to apply.
Best,
Baihan Lin, PhD
Bytes of Minds Lab (Lin Lab)
Departments of AI, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience
Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Friedman Brain Institute, Center for Computational Psychiatry
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
baihan.lin(a)mssm.edu | linlab.org
Nov. 1, 2024
Invitation to EiNS Seminars: Guillermo Cecchi (IBM Research, USA) - AI Challenges for Large Longitudinal Clinical Trials in Mental Health
by Jose A. Fernandez
Dear Comp-Neuro members,
You're cordially invited to join us for the upcoming session of the
“Explorations in Neuroscience Seminars” (EiNS).
We are excited to feature *Guillermo Cecchi* from the *T.J. Watson
Institute at IBM Research, USA*, who will be presenting on “*AI Challenges
for Large Longitudinal Clinical Trials in Mental Health.*”
The lecture will take place on YouTube Live on *Friday, November 15, 2024,
at 3 PM (GMT-3)*. We look forward to your participation!
Please note that this talk will be conducted in Spanish. Feel free to share
this invitation with anyone who might be interested but isn't on our list.
*Link:* https://www.youtube.com/ExactasUNCPBA/live
Best wishes,
*Jose A. Fernandez-Leon Fellenz*Adjunct Professor UNCPBA - Researcher
CONICET
CIFICEN (UNCPBA-CICPBA-CONICET) & INTIA (UNCPBA-CICPBA)
Dept. of Computer Science and Systems - Exactas-UNCPBA
*EMail:* jafernandez(a)intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar
*Web:* https://jafphd.intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar/
*NeuroAI Lab:* https://neuro-ai-lab.intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar/
----------------------
*Title: AI Challenges for Large Longitudinal Clinical Trials in Mental
Health - * *Guillermo Cecchi (Institute T.J. Watson – IBM Research, USA)*
*Abstract: *The recent experience of accelerated vaccine development under
the pressure of the covid pandemic, the massive adoption of consumer
electronics and the explosion of AI capabilities signal a dramatic shift in
the implementation of clinical trials, which have been particularly
ineffective and onerous in mental health. We will present results from
ongoing and recently completed large longitudinal clinical trials for
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Chronic Pain, Prodromal Psychosis and
outcomes across all mental health conditions in which massive streams of
clinical data are combined with at-home ultra-high frequency digital
information including smart phone use, geolocation, and semi-structured and
free-form language to provide a holistic and quasi-real time assessment of
the participants, and will discuss the analytic and interpretation
challenges that emerge in these demanding studies.
*BIO:* https://research.ibm.com/people/guillermo-cecchi
*Academic background:* Guillermo Cecchi received an education in Physics
(MSc, University of La Plata, Argentina, 1991), Physics and Biology (PhD,
The Rockefeller University, 1994-1999), and Imaging in Psychiatry
(Postdoctoral Fellow, Cornell University 2000-2001). He has been interested
in diverse aspects of theoretical biology, including Brownian transport,
molecular computation, spike reliability in neurons, song production and
representation in songbirds, statistics of natural images and visual
perception, statistics of natural language, and brain imaging. In 2001 he
joined IBM Research to work on computational approaches to brain function.
In recent years, Dr. Cecchi has pioneered the use of a computational
linguistics approach to quantify psychiatric conditions from short speech
samples, applying it successfully to conditions as diverse as
schizophrenia, mania, prodromal psychosis, chronic pain, neurodegeneration,
drug and alcohol intake, and psychotherapy.
*Areas of research: *Dr. Cecchi directs the Computational Psychiatry and
the Neuroimaging groups in IBM Research, and is Associate Director of
Analytics for NIH's Advancing Medicines Partnerships - Schizophrenia. From
May 2024, Dr. Cecchi is the co-Director of the PREDiCT Center for outcomes
forecast across all mental health outpatients in New York City Mt Sinai
hospitals (NIH U01 center grant).
*About EiNS Seminars*: This online seminar series aims to go beyond the
human mind to unlock intelligence across nature and machines. The talks
invite a cross-disciplinary exploration of cognitive and decision-making
systems, and computational linguistics from biological organisms to
Artificial Intelligence. By examining the intricacies of minds embedded in
physical bodies or their absence, we aim to uncover novel approaches for
developing neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Join us as we delve
into the fascinating world of embodied and cognitive intelligence,
exploring how memory, learning, decision-making, environmental awareness,
and consciousness manifest across various life forms and AI challenges.
Each talk will feature captivating case studies and open dialogue,
fostering a collaborative environment for generating fresh perspectives.
The talks are recorded only with authorization of the speaker and are
available to everybody at
https://neuro-ai-lab.intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar/eins-seminars.
Oct. 30, 2024
Complex Networks 2024 – Program & Registration now Available!
by Hocine Cherifi
We’re thrilled to invite you to Complex Networks 2024! The program is now
live, featuring an exceptional lineup of keynote speakers, tutorials,
presentations, and sessions that showcase the latest developments in
complex networks.
*Explore the Program:*
Our diverse schedule includes thought-provoking keynotes, hands-on
tutorials, oral presentations, and interactive poster and lightning
sessions. You can view the full program here: [Link to All Files
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gEuIWHM5NXkd75Q3fun5zuTyp-lbFu_o?us…>
].
*Key Highlights:*
- *Tutorials <https://complexnetworks.org/tutorials/> on December 09:*
Join specialized tutorials designed to deepen your knowledge and provide
practical skills.
- *Keynote Speakers <https://complexnetworks.org/keynotes/>:* Gain
insights from renowned experts who will share cutting-edge perspectives on
complex network research and applications.
- *Program at a Glance
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1paPlcRaZmntRoToxc5Rbq8YampNlNLP2/view>*
- *Poster Sessions
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fWZkkYijpASQwZHJfCc5RtnikUwmFCCF/view>*
- *Oral Sessions
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MwPeu5RdoCPPbdp_8zmslmOfwK735ewZ/view>*
- *Lightning Sessions
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/12iZxpGrjcJwMCN4K6gDqkGagWFIEyjkG/view>*
*Register Now:*
Don’t miss the opportunity to engage with leading researchers and
practitioners in the field. If you haven’t registered yet, secure your spot
here: [https://complexnetworks.org/registration/]
<https://complexnetworks.org/registration/>
*Conference Dates and Location:*
Conference will be held from December 10, 2024 to December 12, 2024 in
vibrant Istanbul. In addition to the sessions, enjoy networking
opportunities, including a welcome reception and a gala dinner, to foster
collaboration and connection.
We look forward to seeing you in Istanbul for an enriching and inspiring
event!
Best regards,
Complex Networks 2024 Organizing Committee
Join us at COMPLEX NETWORKS 2024 <https://www.complexnetworks.org/>
*-------------------------*
Hocine CHERIFI
University of Burgundy Franche-Comté
Laboratoire* I*nterdisciplinaire *C*arnot de *B*ourgogne - ICB UMR 6303 CNRS
Editor in Chief Plos Complex Systems
<https://plos.org/complex-systems-research-journal/#:~:text=PLOS%20Complex%2….>
Founding & Adisory Editor Applied Network Science
<https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/>
Editorial Board member PLOS One <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/>, IEEE
ACCESS <https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/?http%3A%2F%2Fieeeaccess_ieee_org%2F>,
Scientific
Reports <https://www.nature.com/srep/>,
Journal of Imaging <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jimaging>, Quality and
Quantity <https://www.springer.com/journal/11135/>, Computational Social
Networks <https://computationalsocialnetworks.springeropen.com/>,
Complex Systems <https://www.complex-systems.com/>
Oct. 30, 2024
Two PhD positions
by Phil Garner
Dear Colleagues,
The Idiap Research Institute in partnership with the Department of
Mathematics at Mahidol University seek two PhD students to work on
Bayesian Optimisation and training techniques for spiking neural
networks. Funded by the Swiss NSF, one student will be based in
Martigny in the Swiss alps, the other in Bangkok in Thailand. Exchanges
between the two are planned.
In addition to promising better understanding of biological processes,
spiking nets have persuasive low-power implications. However, they
present difficulties associated with their many hyperparameters, binary
nature and non-differentiability of the emitted spikes.
At Idiap, the project will build on our recent work that has shown that
spiking networks are plausible solutions for speech processing tasks.
The Bayesian approach will be twofold: In a first thread we will attempt
to show that prior information can compensate for discontinuities in the
error landscape arising from the binary nature. In a second thread, we
will use Bayesian Optimisation techniques to handle the increased number
of hyperparameters associated with spiking neurons.
At Mahidol, the team will be responsible for designing frameworks for
LPNet and neural networks to address the vehicle routing problem (VRP).
The project will explore the effectiveness of these approaches in
solving VRP and identify their limitations. The ultimate aim is to
enhance VRP solutions through our spiking neural network (SNN) framework.
The ideal student should have a master's (or equivalent) degree in
engineering, computer science, physics, or mathematics. They should
have a good background in mathematics, statistics, and programming
(C/C++, Python, scripting languages). Candidates should have a deep
understanding of ANNs and, ideally, familiarity with SNNs.
For more information and to apply,
for Idiap:
https://careers.werecruit.io/en/idiap/offers/phd---bayesian-methods-for-spi…
for Mahidol:
https://mathematics.sc.mahidol.ac.th/scholarship-for-phd-in-mathematics-swi…
The SNSF SPIRIT program is especially concerned with gender and identity
inclusivity; we will emphasize this through the hiring process. In this
sense, we particularly encourage applications from female candidates.
Sincerely,
--
Phil Garner
http://www.idiap.ch/~pgarner
Oct. 30, 2024
PhD opportunity: computational neuroscience of decision-making and addiction
by mailinglists.4svr4@simplelogin.com
I am seeking candidates for a potential PhD project at the University of Surrey, investigating how dopamine shapes memory formation and decision-making in healthy and addictive behaviours.
Essential Requirements
* Strong academic background
* Programming skills (or strong willingness to learn)
* Advanced statistical knowledge (or strong willingness to learn)
* Interest in computational neuroscience and addiction research
Funding Information
Through the South East Doctoral Training Arc (SEDarc), funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), successful candidates can receive:
* Full funding for UK or International students
* Living stipend at UKRI rates
* Access to advanced research training
Previous students from our School have successfully secured these competitive studentships. However, funding is not guaranteed and depends on both the candidate's academic excellence and the strength of the research proposal.
If you are interested, please send your CV to c.feherdasilva(a)surrey.ac.uk . I will be happy to discuss the project idea and guide you through the application process.
Best regards,
Carolina Feher da Silva
Lecturer in Psychology
University of Surrey
Note: This opportunity is open to both UK and International students. The University of Surrey is located in Guildford, 40 minutes from central London.
Oct. 29, 2024
Queers in STEM social London
by Niedernhuber,Maria
Dear all
Representatives of LGBT university staff networks in London, as well as the organisation Pride in STEM, are organising a social for queer academics, focusing on STEM. Anyone is welcome. Since our social originated at a cognitive and computational neuroscience conference, queer neuroscientists are very well represented, and we hope that this will be a great opportunity to network for queer people in cognitive and computational neuroscience.
This is the sign-up link: <https://www.outsavvy.com/event/23202/queers-in-stem-pub-social> https://www.outsavvy.com/event/23202/queers-in-stem-pub-social.
If anyone here is interested in co-organising, please shoot me an email, and feel free to forward the sign-up link to anyone you know who might be interested. We are especially still looking for a contact person at the University of Greenwich and at Royal Holloway University of London, which are not represented in the organising team at the moment, to advertise the social in their local LGBT staff network. Feel free to email me to chat about the initiative, and how to get involved!
Have a lovely week!
Maria (they/them)
---
Maria Niedernhuber
Postdoctoral researcher in Cognitive Neuroscience
Consciousness and Cognition Lab, University of Cambridge
Sleep and Cognition Lab, QMUL
Oct. 29, 2024
[Newsletter] rTAIM Seminar #13 | Ethical Agent or Mere Tool?: A Cautioning Argument for “Moral” Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare | 30 October 2024, 15h00, Online
by steven gouveia
rTAIM (Rebuilding Trust in AI Medicine)
Monthly Seminars
Seminar #13
Ethical Agent or Mere Tool?: A Cautioning Argument for “Moral” Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Jordan Joseph Wadden (Unity Health Toronto - Canada)
Following the 12th rTAIM Online Seminar (by Francesco Prinzi, University of Palermo), we are happy to announce the first seminar of this academic year 2024/2025, the 13th rTAIM Online Seminar, with the participation of Jordan Joseph Wadden (Unity Health Toronto, Canada), on the 30th October 2024, 15h00-16h30 Lisbon Time Zone, via Zoom.
ONLINE | Link Zoom<https://videoconf-colibri.zoom.us/j/95294324802?pwd=Lt2o4boR0iHYWFtXvu6KdrD…>
ID: 952 9432 4802 | Password: 506705
#Seminar 13: To talk of moral machines presupposes that researchers understand enough about how humans come to their own conceptions of the good. Moral epistemology and moral psychology have struggled to describe these facts and processes, and we still don’t have a generalizable conception. However, there appears to be an assumption that ethics can nonetheless be instilled directly into artificial intelligence. This is of special concern in healthcare because algorithms and systems are being designed to recommend treatments and pathways for patients. But finding the right treatment for a patient requires more than just an analysis of the medical facts. Healthcare teams must also weigh preferences, goals, psycho-social needs, religious and spiritual beliefs, quality of life, and so on. Each of these elements has a unique, and often individualized, moral element. This paper presents an argument that healthcare artificial intelligence ought to be viewed as a mere tool, rather than as a (quasi-)moral agent which could act alone in the clinical encounter. I argue that some researchers have become distracted by the AI and robot rights discussions, making them think it’s possible to code ethics into a system when humans still don’t understand how we come to believe our own moral beliefs.
Short Bio: Jordan Joseph Wadden, MA, PhD, HEC-C, is a clinical ethicist at Unity Health Toronto in Canada. He is an assistant professor (status only) in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto. His research focuses on the ethical implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning in healthcare. He was the winner of the 2024 Ethics of AI Award at the 3rd International Conference on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
rTAIM Seminars: https://ifilosofia.up.pt/activities/rtaim-seminars
https://trustaimedicine.weebly.com/rtaim-seminars.html
Organisation:
Steven S. Gouveia (MLAG/IF)
Mind, Language and Action Group (MLAG)
Instituto de Filosofia da Universidade do Porto – UIDB/00502/2020
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)
____________________________________________
Instituto de Filosofia (UI&D 502)
Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
Via Panorâmica s/n
4150-564 Porto
Tel. 22 607 71 80
E-mail: ifilosofia(a)letras.up.pt<mailto:ifilosofia@letras.up.pt>
http://ifilosofia.up.pt/
Oct. 28, 2024
NIH-funded Post-doctoral fellowship - spatial navigation, gait, mobility, EEG, MRI, virtual reality - in biomedical engineering at the University of Florida
by Steve Weisberg
A postdoctoral researcher position studying electrocortical activity during
human navigation is available in the laboratory of Dr. Daniel Ferris (
https://faculty.eng.ufl.edu/human-neuromechanics-laboratory) This position
is for an initial one-year appointment, and has the potential to be renewed
for three additional years based on performance and funding availability.
https://explore.jobs.ufl.edu/cw/en-us/job/533572/postdoc
Join a team studying age- and ADRD-related changes in gait and navigation,
including Rachael Seidler, Dan Ferris, and Steve Weisberg.
--
---------------------------------------------
*Steven M. Weisberg, PhD *
Pronouns: he/him/his
Assistant Professor of Psychology
University of Florida
Director: SCANN Lab <http://scannlab.psych.ufl.edu>
Oct. 28, 2024
[comp-neuro] job advertisement | 1 fully funded PhD position (E13) | Application deadline: Nov.18, 2024
by Daniel Schmid
Vacancy for dissertation/PhD project
*Learning Search and Decision Mechanisms in Medical Diagnosis*
We are looking for a new PhD student for a fully funded
interdisciplinary research project investigating the computational
mechanisms underlying the perceptual processes in medical imaging.
*Brief project description and goals*
Medical experts routinely screen images for signs of abnormality
indicative of a disease. Experimental evidence shows that these experts,
based on their training, are able to make a diagnose above chance level
even after screening images for only a few seconds. Such visual
inspection utilizes global ensemble scene statistics, or “scene gist”,
to provide contextual guidance information.
The goal of the PhD project is to investigate how such global,
contextual gist information can be computed and incorporated in machine
vision approaches, such as deep neural networks for natural or medical
image processing. In particular, a goal is to develop neural mechanisms
that can be integrated into existing pre-trained CNNs to compute scene
gist for rapid global decision-making and contextual guidance in medical
images. Such mechanisms should explain how such global feature
compositions are learned to increase the classification specificity and,
at the same time, do not equip an observer with the ability to precisely
localize such feature compositions indicative of the evidence. At the
implementation level, computational units (neurons) in hierarchical CNN
architectures will be extended by integrating local bottom-up feature
extraction mechanisms with top-down modulatory contextual fields. We
focus on these mechanisms to learn the integration of information
streams in counter-stream networks by employing novel two-point
information integration units inspired by recent findings from
neuroscience. These investigations will contribute to develop novel CNN
architectures by integrating feedforward and feedback data streams that
operate at different spatio-temporal scales and feature types inspired
by computational mechanisms in biological vision. The combined global
and local information is expected to provide more detailed explanations
on a mechanistic level how radiologists steer their attention and search
capacities and learn to improve such skills.
*Requirements*
- MSc degree in Computer Science, Engineering, Physics, Mathematics,
Cognitive Systems/Science or equivalent relevant background
- Experience in computational vision, neural networks, machine learning;
with strong mathematical/physics foundation
- Experience in developing biologically inspired models – or interested
in learning how to develop such mechanisms and models
- Experience in analysis of large data and evaluation of results
- Strong coding skills
- Personal skills: working in a team, but should be able to work
independently, is strongly focused and enthusiastic about the project
theme, is self-motivated and takes responsibility for reaching milestones
- Experience and talent in scientific writing (with proficient written &
oral English)
*Contact & application*
The project is part of the newly founded research training group “KEMAI”
that focuses on integrating knowledge and learning based approaches for
better medical AI (https://kemai.uni-ulm.de/ for more information). The
offered PhD position is fully funded (E13 salary) and also benefits from
an interdisciplinary setting, the ability to connect with peers from
related projects and a clearly structured PhD program.
Application materials are expected until November 18, 2024. They should
contain a CV, statement of research interest and background in relation
to the KEMAI training group and project theme C2. A cover letter should
inform about the expected date of availability and name of two referees.
Submit your application via the KEMAI website (preferred) or to Prof.
Heiko Neumann (heiko.neumann(a)uni-ulm.de) or reach out for more information.
Best regards,
Daniel Schmid
--
Daniel Schmid, M.Sc.
Institute of Neural Information Processing
Faculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology
Ulm University
James-Frank-Ring
D-89081 Ulm
Germany
e-mail: daniel-1.schmid(a)uni-ulm.de
Oct. 28, 2024
Justin Wood speaking on November 12 in Developing Minds global online lecture series
by Jochen Triesch
Dear colleagues,
On November 12, the Developing Minds global online lecture series is proud to host Justin Wood from Indiana University Bloomington, USA, speaking on: "Radical empiricism: The origins of knowledge as a mini-evolution“
Tuesday, November 12, 2024
9:00 am EST (Eastern Standard Time, US)
14:00 UTC (Universal Coordinated Time)
15:00 CET (Central European Time)
23:00 JST (Japan Standard Time)
The zoom link/credentials are:
https://uni-frankfurt.zoom-x.de/j/62980753356?pwd=0J6BtOaAy20YyanXX1gpkB3Ta…
Meeting-ID: 629 8075 3356
Kenncode: 904159
Abstract:
What are the origins of knowledge? A common theoretical strategy is to isolate core primitives of the mind, such as systems for reasoning about objects, space, number, agents, and language. The problem with this strategy is it disconnects brain development from general fitting principles that underlie chemistry, evolution, culture, and artificial intelligence. I argue that development can be understood as a “mini-evolution,” in which core mental skills are the products of generic evolution-like fitting processes. In evolution, life started from scratch, and species emerged as DNA adapted to the world via blind fitting. Likewise, in development, knowledge starts from scratch, and mental skills emerge as individual brains adapt to the world via blind fitting.
Historically, the main roadblock for testing fitting theories has been the lack of benchmarks and models for measuring whether fitting models learn like brains. To directly compare learning across brains and models, both must be trained with the same data and tested on the same tasks. We propose a solution—called “Newborn Embodied Turing Tests” (NETTs)—in which newborn animals and fitting models are reared in the same environments and tested with the same tasks. I’ll describe a series of NETTs showing that generic fitting models (transformers) develop many core mental skills, including orientation selectivity, visual binding, shape-based vision, invariant object recognition, imprinting, collective behavior, and social preferences. These skills develop spontaneously when generic fitting models fit to prenatal and postnatal experiences.
There is no need to postulate mysterious core primitives to explain the rapid development of domain-specific knowledge. Rather, core knowledge can be the product of generic fitting machinery: a radical empiricist view of the origins of knowledge. This mini-evolution view unifies chemistry, evolution, development, culture, and artificial intelligence under a common fitting framework, with shared general principles.
Short Bio:
Justin Wood is an Associate Professor of Informatics at Indiana University Bloomington. He is affiliated with programs in Animal Behavior, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Psychological & Brain Sciences. He received his B.A. from University of Virginia and M.S. & Ph.D. from Harvard University. Dr. Wood has studied the psychological abilities of a range of populations, including human adults, children, infants, chimpanzees, wild monkeys, starlings, and newborn chicks. He works at the intersection of developmental psychology, neuroscience, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to characterize the origins and computational foundations of intelligence.
The talk will be recorded and made available for later viewing. For more information on the talk series and recordings of previous events, please visit:
https://sites.google.com/view/developing-minds-series/home
Best regards,
Jochen Triesch
--
Prof. Dr. Jochen Triesch
Johanna Quandt Chair for Theoretical Life Sciences
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and
Goethe University Frankfurt
http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~triesch/
Tel: +49 (0)69 798-47531
Fax: +49 (0)69 798-47611
Oct. 28, 2024
Re: Join Us for the Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop – Institute of Physics, London
by Rajpal, Hardik
Dear Colleagues,
We are pleased to announce that registrations are now open for the Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop, taking place on the 25th and 26th of November 2024 at the Institute of Physics, King’s Cross, London. You can register for the event here:
https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/register
We would also like to remind everyone that the abstract submission deadline for the poster session is fast approaching on 31st October 2024. PhD students and early career researchers are particularly encouraged to submit abstracts for this exciting opportunity to share your work. Please submit your abstracts at the following link:
https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/abstract-submission
For further details about the workshop, you can explore the program here:
https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/programme
Additionally, we are thrilled to announce a public event featuring a fireside chat between Prof. John Krakauer and Prof. Karl Friston on the intriguing topic, "Can Reductionism Explain the Mind?" This discussion will take place on the evening of 25th November, followed by a drinks reception.
We look forward to welcoming you to an interdisciplinary gathering that will bring together experts from neuroscience and physics to explore cognition in innovative ways.
If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out, and we hope to see you there!
Sincerely,
Hardik Rajpal
Research Associate
Organizing Committee, Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop
Imperial College London
From: Rajpal, Hardik via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org>
Date: Monday, 7 October 2024 at 12:39
To: comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org>
Subject: [Comp-neuro] Join Us for the Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop – Institute of Physics, London
This email from comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list<https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx> to disable email stamping for this address.
Dear Colleagues,
We are excited to announce that the Statistical Physics of Cognition workshop will take place on the 25th and 26th of November 2024 at the Institute of Physics, King's Cross, London. This workshop will explore the intersection of physics and neuroscience to better understand cognition, bringing together leading researchers from various disciplines, including statistical mechanics, network science, self-organized criticality, information theory, and more.
The programme for the workshop is now live and can be viewed here: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/programme.
While registrations open next week, we invite those interested in attending to fill out an expression of interest form in advance:
https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/registration
We especially encourage PhD students and Early Career Researchers to participate by submitting abstracts for poster presentations. This is a great opportunity to present your research, receive feedback from leading experts, and engage in exciting discussions.
* Abstract submission deadline: 31st October 2024
* Submit your abstract here: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/abstract-submission
We look forward to welcoming you to what promises to be a thought-provoking event at the frontier of cognitive science and physics.
Please feel free to share this announcement with your colleagues, students, and networks. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out.
Best regards,
Hardik Rajpal
Research Associate
Organizing Committee, Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop
Imperial College London
Oct. 25, 2024
World wide VVTNS series: Fifth season opening lecture, Wednesday, October 30, 2024, at 11:00 am EDT
by David Hansel
*Important:*
The seminar is at 11 am *EDT*
Daylight saving time ends on Sunday, November 3, 2024
In Europe it ends on Sunday October 27, 2024
[image: VVTNS.png]
https://www.wwtns.online
<https://streaklinks.com/A9c7PbbpKY7PxB6PaAJWGD3-/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wwtns.on…>
-
on twitter: wwtns@TheoreticalWide
You are cordially invited to the fifth season opening lecture of the
online VVTNS series
*Karel Svoboda*
Allen Institute
on the topic of
*Illuminating synaptic learning*
The lecture will be held on zoom on October 30, 2023, at *11:00 am EDT *
To receive the zoom link: https://www.wwtns.online/register-page
*Abstract: *How do synapses in the middle of the brain know how to adjust
their weight to advance a behavioral goal (i.e. learning)? This is referred
to as the synaptic ‘credit assignment problem’. A large variety of synaptic
learning rules have been proposed, mainly in the context of artificial
neural networks. The most powerful learning rules (e.g. back-propagation of
error) are thought to be biologically implausible, whereas the widely
studied biological learning rules (Hebbian) are insufficient for
goal-directed learning. I will describe ongoing work focused on
understanding synaptic learning rules in the cortex in a brain-computer
interface task.
ᐧ
--
*Il n'y a ni obligation ni pression à traiter ou répondre à ce mail en
dehors des heures de travail*
"В каждой шутке есть доля шутки"
'Life is good ..' (Carl van Vreeswijk, 1962-2022)
---------------------------------------
David Hansel
Directeur de Recherche au CNRS
Co-Group leader
Cerebral Dynamics Plasticity and Learning lab., CNRS
45 rue des Saints Peres 75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tel (Cell): +33 607508403 - Fax (33).1.49.27.90.62
*CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE:* *This message and the documents that
might be attached, are addressed exclusively to their(s) recipient(s) and
may contain privileged or confidential information. The access to this
information by people other than those designated is not authorized. If you
are not the indicated recipient, you are notified that the use, disclosure
and / or copying without authorization is prohibited under current
legislation. If you have received this message in error, please kindly
inform the sender immediately and proceed to its destruction.*
ᐧ
Oct. 25, 2024
Software developer at Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
by Erik De Schutter
The Computational Neuroscience unit (https://www.oist.jp/research/research-units/cnu) at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Japan has an opening for a postdoctoral researcher or technician to contribute to the software development of the nanoscale simulator of neuronal electrophysiology and molecular properties STEPS https://steps.sourceforge.net/STEPS/default.php. Initial duration is two years with an option to extend.
The software developer will join the STEPS team and contribute to maintenance and further expansion of the software capacities. Recent versions of STEPS improved its parallel performance (http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2022.883742/full) and added modeling of vesicles (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-06276-5) The ideal candidate will have a scientific background but also possess good programming skills, but experienced software engineers can also apply.
Competences:
For the postdoctoral position a recent PhD is required in a relevant discipline such as neuroscience, molecular biology, biophysics, biochemistry, and for a technician a masters degree is required in a software/computer science related discipline. For either position, we require a talented programmer with experience in C++ and Python. In satisfying these criteria, it is expected that the candidate has some experience of modeling neuronal or other biological processes computationally, but this is not essential if the candidate has a strong enough interest in moving into the field. Fluent English conversation and writing skills are required.
Benefits / Offer:
A competitive salary and relocation package are offered. This an ideal position to gain experience in a prominent computational neuroscience lab. Contributions of technicians are honored by authorship on relevant publications.
Please contact Prof. Erik De Schutter (erik(a)oist.jp) for inquiries.
Oct. 25, 2024
2024 Bonsai Developer Conference
by Joaquin Rapela
Hello,
We are excited to invite you to the 2024 Bonsai Developer Conference, taking
place from December 2nd to 4th, 2024, at the Sainsbury Wellcome Centre in
London, UK. This event brings together neuroscience researchers, computational
scientists, and software engineers with a shared interest in the Bonsai visual
reactive programming language.
The conference program and additional details can be found at
https://conference.bonsai-rx.org/2024/
About Bonsai
------------
Bonsai https://bonsai-rx.org/ is an open-source reactive visual programming language
widely use for neuroscience experimental control.
Differently from standard programming languages where control flow is specified
by composing sequences of instructions, and checking conditional loops
for the occurrence of events, in reactive languages https://introtorx.com/
the control flow is specified by composing event streams. By placing asynchronous
data streams front and centre, it becomes much easier to succinctly build complex
programs manipulating hundreds of parallel data sources and controllers while
retaining interoperability and modularity.
Bonsai is a visual programming language where programs are laid out graphically.
Each node represents a data stream, and edges represent input dependencies
between streams. Parameters can be manipulated dynamically and every stream can
be inspected at runtime. This graphical approach allows users with no programming experience
to create complex asynchronous programs, and experienced Bonsai users to very quickly
deploy and manage entire systems and applications.
Bonsai is able to interface with a large number of experimental hardware
for neuroscience experimental control, allowing researchers to easily build
sophisticated experiments.
We look forward to see you in London!
Best regards,
Goncalo Lopes g.lopes(a)neurogears.org
Nicholas Guilbeault n.guilbeault(a)ucl.ac.uk
Joaquin Rapela j.rapela(a)ucl.ac.uk
Oct. 22, 2024
Computational Psychology or Neuroscience Assistant Professor Position at the University of Arizona
by Cowen, Stephen Leigh - (scowen)
Hello everyone,
The University of Arizona Psychology Department is hiring a tenure-track Assistant Professor in computational psychology, computational cognitive science, and/or computational neuroscience. A complete description of the position can be found below. We are looking for an individual with expertise and a publication history in domains such as modeling complex systems and behavior using approaches such as deep learning, machine learning, Bayesian methods, artificial neural networks, reinforcement learning, dynamic systems modelling, network analysis, and large language models. Preference will be given to applicants with the potential to collaborate across disciplines in Cognitive Science and Psychology.
See the full posting and apply using the following link:
https://arizona.csod.com/ux/ats/careersite/4/home/requisition/20668?c=arizo…
The first batch of applications will be reviewed on Nov. 12. Applications will be accepted until the position is filled.
Best,
Stephen
------------------------------------------
Stephen Cowen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Psychology
Evelyn F. McKnight Brian Institute
Interim Director: Cognition and Neural Systems
Graduate interdisciplinary member:
Neuroscience, Physiological Sciences, Applied Biosciences, and Cognitive Science
The University of Arizona
Life Sciences North, Rm 347
1501 N. Campbell Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85724-5115
520-626-2615
Oct. 22, 2024
Postdoctoral Opportunity in My Research Group at University of Tennessee Knoxville
by Maroulas, Vasileios
Dear Colleagues,
I wanted to bring to your attention a postdoctoral opening in my research group at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) and the Department of Mathematics at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
The position is at the intersection of topological deep learning and computational neuroscience and it is a collaboration with the US Army Research lab.
Please feel free to share the following link with anyone who might be interested in the position:
https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/list/25406
Thank you in advance for helping spread the word.
Best regards,
Vasileios
Vasileios Maroulas, Ph.D.
Associate Vice Chancellor
Director, AI Tennessee Initiative
Professor of Mathematics
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Office of Research, Innovation, & Economic Development <https://research.utk.edu/oried/>
Andy Holt Tower
1331 Circle Park Drive
Knoxville, TN 37996-0100
Department of Mathematics<https://math.utk.edu/>
Ayres Hall
1403 Circle Dr.
Knoxville, TN 37996
email: vasileios.maroulas(a)utk.edu<mailto:vasileios.maroulas@utk.edu>
office: 865-974-4302
LinkedIn: Vasileios Maroulas| LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/vasileios-maroulas-8721643/>
Oct. 22, 2024
Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
by Julie Goulet
Oct. 22, 2024
Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
by Sara A. Solla
Stephen,
You have an explanation for everything.
I was at the NIPS (now NeurIPS) meeting when you were giving a talk, but
instead of talking about your work you spent the time allotted to you to
complain about Hopfield stealing your ideas. I do not quite remember the
year, but I am sure you do - late 1980s? So, yes, you have been complaining
about this for as long as I know you.
Word limits allow you to mention Hopfield’s 84 paper but not his 82
paper??!! It takes as many characters to write 82 as to write 84. The 82
paper was published at a time before ArXiv, preprints, and online postings,
that is to say an actually printed copy became available, and that was in
April 82. Your paper, the one where you did it all before, was submitted in
August 82. You submitted your paper a few months after the 1982 paper by
Hopfield appeared in print in PNAS. Anyone can verify this by looking at
the printed versions of these two papers.
What nobody can verify is that ‘someone told you that Hopfield knew about
your paper’ before writing his.
What cannot be verified is that there was a version of your paper that you
tried to submit in 1980 to a journal that just happened to disappear.
The article from 1971 that I referred to is the one you cited in your first
tirade. The paper is about "Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural
networks". According to Google Scholar, it has received 118 citations. And
it is NOT because it appeared in a journal that has ceased to exist. It
appeared in PNAS. I will assume that the 118 citations is an accurate
measure of the interest that the paper has triggered in the 53 years since
it was published.
That you wrote a review in 1988 and that Michael Cohen wrote an article in
1992 does not give either of you precedence over Hopfield’s 1982 and 1984
papers.
The Group on Statistical Physics and Nonlinear Dynamics of the American
Physical Society organized a session to discuss the Nobel Prize given to
Hopfield and Hinton. You can watch it on YouTube,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inMeFnIhuA8. My advice to you is to watch
this discussion, read the 1982 and 1984 papers by Hopfield, then read your
own papers, and try to see what it is that he figured out and that you
missed. More than forty years later, it is time for you to look into these
papers and acknowledge the crucial differences. If you still do not see it,
I will be glad to try to explain it to you.
Then you get to Hinton. Once I reminded you that the Prize citation is
about the Boltzmann Machine and not about Back Propagation, you stopped
criticizing Back Propagation to instead advertise work by James Williamson
published in 1996 and 1997. These papers seem not to precede but to follow
the 1985 publication of the Boltzmann Machine paper by 11 and 12 years.
As for what was the atmosphere of intellectual intimidation in your group,
you say that I would not know because I was not there. This is factually
incorrect. I was there. I visited. I saw the group dynamics, and I was
shocked. I was a young scientist, just a few years beyond my PhD, but I had
never seen anything like it. One had to believe, not just agree with but
believe in ART to work in your group. I ask you again: if ART provides a
solution to every problem, as you advertised then and seem to continue to
advertise today, how come there are still unsolved problems?
The long note you have published in response to the Physics Nobel Prize is
just pathetic.
Sara
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 6:22 PM Grossberg, Stephen <steve(a)bu.edu> wrote:
> Dear Sara,
>
>
>
> I reply below to your claims.
>
>
>
> *From: *Sara A. Solla <sasolla(a)gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, October 21, 2024 at 5:12 PM
> *To: *Grossberg, Stephen <steve(a)bu.edu>
> *Cc: *André Fabio Kohn via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org>,
> Stephen Grossberg <steve(a)cns.bu.edu>
> *Subject: *Re: [Comp-neuro] Re: Some scientific history that I
> experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
>
> You don't often get email from sasolla(a)gmail.com. Learn why this is
> important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>
> Stephen,
>
> You have been complaining about not getting enough credit since I first
> met you in the mid 1980s.
>
>
>
> That is not true.
>
>
>
> You refer to publishing before Hopfield's 1984 paper. You deliberately
> ignore his 1982 paper, which received 27946 citations:
> Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective
> computational abilities, JJ Hopfield
> PNAS, April 15, 1982, 79 (8) 2554-2558
>
>
>
> My post was originally on a web site with strict word limits. That is why
> I mentioned Hopfield’s 1984 article, but not his 1982 article.
>
>
>
> Section 6 of my 1988 review article:
>
>
>
> Grossberg, S. (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms,
> and architectures. *Neural Networks*, *1 *, 17-61.
>
> https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1988NN.pdf
>
>
>
> reviews Binary, Linear, and Continuous-Nonlinear classical neural network
> models by many authors.
>
>
>
> This article has been cited 2410 times.
>
>
>
> Section 6 shows that the 1982 equation that Hopfield used is a variant of
> the 1943 McCulloch-Pitts model.
>
>
>
> The Liapunov function for it is just a discrete version of the Liapunov
> function for the Additive Model.
>
>
> In contrast, the 1971 student paper you mentioned received 118 citations.
>
>
>
> I assume that you mean:
>
>
>
> Grossberg, S. (1971). Embedding fields: Underlying philosophy,
> mathematics, and applications to psychology, physiology, and anatomy. *Journal
> of Cybernetics*, 1, 28-50.
>
> https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971JoC.pdf
>
>
>
> This was a review article published in a journal that ceased to exist in
> 1980 (see below) and thus could not be searched well by Google, which began
> in 1998.
>
>
>
> The article discussed Generalized Additive Models (see its Section 6).
>
>
>
> I was able to get articles published proving global limit and oscillation
> theorems for Generalized Additive Models in the* Proceedings of the
> National Academy of Sciences* between 1967 and 1971; e.g.,
>
>
>
> Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural
> networks. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, 68, 828-831.
>
> https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971ProNatAcaSci.pdf
>
>
>
> See Equations 1, 2, 3, and 4 etc.
>
>
>
> Your 1983 paper with Michael Cohen in IEEE Transaction of Man, Systems,
> and Cybernetics was received on August 1, 1982, several months after the
> 1982 paper by Hopfeld had appeared in print. You did get a good number of
> citations on this paper, 3344, but not as good as 27946.
>
>
>
> Michael Cohen and I tried to submit it to the *Journal of Cybernetics* in
> 1980.
>
>
>
> But there was a glitch in the submission process due to the fact that the *Journal
> of Cybernetics* unexpectedly stopped publishing that year and our article
> got lost in the shuffle, unknown to us for a while.
>
>
>
> We resubmitted in 1982, which is why it was published in 1983.
>
>
>
> Our results pre-dated Hopfield 1982 and 1984 by two years.
>
>
>
> About the difference in citations:
>
>
>
> There is a difference between discovery and marketing. I was told that
> Hopfield knew about my work before and with Michael Cohen before he went
> around the country lecturing about work that we had previously published,
> without citation.
>
>
>
> You mention a 1982 paper with Michael Cohen; I have not been able to find
> it.
>
>
>
> I think that was a typo. Michael published the following article in 1992:
>
>
>
> Cohen, M. A. (1992). The construction of arbitrary stable dynamics in
> nonlinear neural networks.
>
> *Neural Networks*, 5, 83 – 103.
>
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0893608005800085
>
>
>
> Here is the Abstract:
>
>
>
> “In this paper, two methods for constructing systems of ordinary
> differential equations realizing any fixed finite set of equilibria in any
> fixed finite dimension are introduced; no spurious equilibria are possible
> for either method. By using the first method, one can construct a system
> with the fewest number of equilibria, given a fixed set of attractors.
> Using a strict *Lyapunov function [boldface mine] *for each of these
> differential equations, a large class of systems with the same set of
> equilibria is constructed. A method of fitting these nonlinear systems to
> trajectories is proposed. In addition, a general method which will produce
> an arbitrary number of periodic orbits of shapes of arbitrary complexity is
> also discussed. A more general second method is given to construct a
> differential equation which converges to a fixed given finite set of
> equilibria. This technique is much more general in that it allows this set
> of equilibria to have any of a large class of indices which are consistent
> with the Morse Inequalities. It is clear that this class is not universal,
> because there is a large class of additional vector fields with convergent
> dynamics which cannot be constructed by the above method. The easiest way
> to see this is to enumerate the set of Morse indices which can be obtained
> by the above method and compare this class with the class of Morse indices
> of arbitrary differential equations with convergent dynamics. The former
> set of indices are a proper subclass of the latter, therefore, the above
> construction cannot be universal. In general, it is a difficult open
> problem to construct a specific example of a differential equation with a
> given fixed set of equilibria, permissible Morse indices, and permissible
> connections between stable and unstable manifolds. A strict Lyapunov
> function is given for this second case as well. This strict *Lyapunov
> function [boldface mine] *as above enables construction of a large class
> of examples consistent with these more complicated dynamics and indices.
> The determination of all the basins of attraction in the general9 case for
> these systems is also difficult and open.”
>
>
>
> I have never heard anybody referring to you as 'the father of AI'.
>
>
>
> As an acolyte of Hopfield, you wouldn’t.
>
>
>
> What I do remember is a visit to your group at BU many, many years ago -
> in the late 80s or early 90s. I was amazed at finding out that you closely
> supervised every word in every slide that anybody in your group was allowed
> to show when invited to give a talk. Everybody was under a lot of pressure
> to 'stay on message', where the 'message' was your view on things. I had
> never encountered a scientific group run as a cult. It made an impression,
> but not a positive one. So much for training over 100 people - by teaching
> them not to think by themselves.
>
>
>
> You describe my devoted teaching as something ugly, even ad hominem.
>
>
>
> When I was a student, no one told me how to write an article or how to
> prepare and give a talk or poster. I developed a method to enable my
> students to grow intellectually and become independent scholars.
>
>
>
> When I started working with a new PhD student or postdoc, we discussed
> what topics would potentially interest them. Then we read hundreds of
> psychological and neurobiological articles together about that topic and
> began to discuss the results in them.
>
>
>
> For students interested in engineering and AI, we studied all the methods
> that were available to solve problems in a targeted problem domain.
>
>
>
> I encouraged my students to advance their own concepts about what might be
> the underlying mechanisms that generated an article’s data or benchmarks.
> Because we studied large amounts of data, favorite concepts often hit a
> brick wall and had to be discarded.
>
>
>
> We developed a modeling method that I like to call the Method of Minimal
> Anatomies. See Figure 2.37 in my 2021 Magnum Opus
>
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Conscious-Mind-Resonant-Brain-Makes/dp/0190070552
>
>
>
> This Method is just Occam’s Razor applied to neural networks.
>
>
>
> As the Figure summarizes, it “Operationalizes the proper level of
> abstraction” and “that you cannot ‘derive a brain’ in one step”. Our models
> have been getting incrementally developed in a principled way to the
> present time.
>
>
>
> Your statement that “the message was your [my] view on things” is the
> opposite of how we worked.
>
>
>
> And how would you know? You were not there.
>
>
>
> The proof of the pudding is that all my students got positions that they
> wanted after they earned their PhD’s with me.
>
>
>
> I was also told by multiple famous scientists that our department sent
> them their best postdoctoral fellows.
>
>
>
> In fact, various major labs would contact me to let me know that they had
> an open position and asked if one of my students was about to graduate.
>
>
>
> My students have gone on to successful careers after their postdocs and
> other first post-PhD positions.
>
>
>
> Around half of them went into academe, and the other half into
> engineering, technology, and AI.
>
>
>
> Groups of us have periodically gotten together for happy social events,
> either at international conferences or in the Boston area.
>
>
>
> And they sent me information about their accomplishments and growing
> families for many years.
>
>
>
> As for back-propagation, this is not what Hinton is cited for in the Nobel
> Prize citation. It is for the Boltzmann machine.
>
>
>
> Yes, I know that, and I have also noted that my PhD student, James
> Williamson, developed statistical neural network models that did not have
> problems related to deep Learning. I have elsewhere noted that:
>
>
> Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMS) also have analogs in the Adaptive
> Resonance Theory (ART) family of models, but without the problems that
> follow from using variants of Deep Learning.
>
> Here are two of them, both developed by my PhD student, James R.
> Williamson:
>
> Gaussian ARTMAP: A Neural Network for Fast Incremental Learning of Noisy
> Multidimensional Maps
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0893608095001158
>
> A Constructive, Incremental Learning Network for Mixture Modeling and
> Classification
>
> http://techlab.bu.edu/files/resources/articles_tt/A%20constructive,%20incre…
>
>
>
> Finally, I always wondered: If ART solves all problems, why are there
> ML/AI problems that remain to be solved?
>
>
>
> I would never claim that. I have always taught that science is never done.
> See the Method of Minimal Anatomies.
>
>
>
> The fact that you can even think that about my work shows, sad to say, how
> biased you have become.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 7:49 AM Grossberg, Stephen via Comp-neuro <
> comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org> wrote:
>
> Dear Comp-neuro colleagues,
>
>
>
> Here are some short summaries of the history of neural network
> discoveries, as I experienced it, that are relevant to the recent Nobel
> Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton:
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++THETHE THE NOBEL
> PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
> FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HOPFIELD
>
> Here I summarize my concerns about the Hopfield award.
>
> I published articles in 1967 – 1972 in the Proceedings of the National
> Academy of Sciences that introduced the Additive Model that Hopfield used
> in 1984. My articles proved global theorems about the limits and
> oscillations of my Generalized Additive Models. See sites.bu.edu/steveg for
> these articles.
>
> For example:
>
> Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural
> networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831.
> https://lnkd.in/emzwx4Tw
>
> This article illustrates that my mathematical results were part of a
> research program to develop biological neural networks that provide
> principled mechanistic explanations of psychological and neurobiological
> data.
>
> Later, Michael Cohen and I published a Liapunov function that included the
> Additive Model and generalizations thereof in 1982 and 1983 before Hopfield
> (1984) appeared.
>
> For example,
>
> Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern
> formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE
> Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826.
> https://lnkd.in/eAFAdvbu
>
> I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before he published his 1984
> article, without citation.
>
> Recall that I started my neural networks research in 1957 as a Freshman at
> Dartmouth College.
>
> That year, I introduced the biological neural network paradigm, as well as
> the short-term memory (STM), medium-term memory (MTM), and long-term memory
> (LTM) laws that are used to this day, including in the Additive Model, to
> explain data about how brains make minds.
>
> See the review in https://lnkd.in/gJZJtP_W .
>
> When I started in 1957, I knew no one else who was doing neural networks.
> That is why my colleagues call me the Father of AI.
>
> I then worked hard to create a neural networks community, notably a
> research center, academic department, the International Neural Network
> Society, the journal Neural Networks, multiple international conferences on
> neural networks, and Boston-area research centers, while training over 100
> gifted PhD students, postdocs, and faculty to do neural network research.
> See the Wikipedia page.
>
> That is why I did not have time or strength to fight for priority of my
> models.
>
> Recently, I was able to provide a self-contained and non-technical
> overview and synthesis of some of my scientific discoveries since 1957, as
> well as explanations of the work of many other scientists, in my 2021
> Magnum Opus
>
> Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
>
> https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
> FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HINTON
>
> Here I summarize my concerns about the Hinton award.
>
> Many authors developed Back Propagation (BP) before Hinton; e.g., Amari
> (1967), Werbos (1974), Parker (1982), all before Rumelhart, Hinton, &
> Williams (1986).
>
> BP has serious computational weaknesses:
>
> It is UNTRUSTWORTHY (because it is UNEXPLAINABLE).
>
> It is UNRELIABLE (because it can experience CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING.
>
> It should thus never be used in financial or medical applications.
>
> BP learning is also SLOW and uses non-biological NONLOCAL WEIGHT TRANSPORT.
>
> See Figure, right column, top.
>
> In 1988, I published 17 computational problems of BP:
> https://lnkd.in/erKJvXFA
>
> BP gradually grew out of favor because other models were better.
>
> Later, huge online databases and supercomputers enabled Deep Learning to
> use BP to learn.
>
> My 1988 article contrasted BP with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) which I
> first published in 1976:
> https://lnkd.in/evkfq22G
>
> See Figure, right column, bottom.
>
> ART never had BP’s problems.
>
> ART is now the most advanced cognitive and neural theory that explains HOW
> HUMANS LEARN TO ATTEND, RECOGNIZE, and PREDICT events in a changing world.
>
> ART also explains and simulates data from hundreds of psychological and
> neurobiological experiments.
>
> In 1980, I derived ART from a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT about how ANY system can
> AUTONOMOUSLY learn to correct predictive errors in a changing world:
> https://lnkd.in/eGWE8kJg
>
> The thought experiment derives ART from a few facts of life that do not
> mention mind or brain.
>
> ART is thus a UNIVERSAL solution of the problem of autonomous error
> correction in a changing world.
>
> That is why ART models can be used in designs for AUTONOMOUS ADAPTIVE
> INTELLIGENCE in engineering, technology, and AI.
>
> ART also proposes a solution of the classical MIND-BODY PROBLEM:
>
> HOW, WHERE in our brains, and WHY from a deep computational perspective,
> we CONSCIOUSLY SEE, HEAR, FEEL, and KNOW about the world, and use our
> conscious states to PLAN and ACT to realize VALUED GOALS.
>
> For details, see
>
> Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
>
> https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Comp-neuro mailing list -- comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org
> Mailing list webpage (to subscribe or view archives):
> https://www.cnsorg.org/comp-neuro-mailing-list
>
> To contact admin/moderators, send an email to:
> comp-neuro-owner(a)lists.cnsorg.org
> To unsubscribe, send an email to comp-neuro-leave(a)lists.cnsorg.org
>
>
Oct. 22, 2024
[Deadline Nov. 1st][Call for Data & Papers] 2nd International Whole Brain Architecture Workshop (Feb. 24th, 2025)
by Hiroshi Yamakawa
Dear Colleagues,
<< Abstract submission site is now open; data paper templates are
available! >>
We are pleased to announce the Second International Whole Brain
Architecture Workshop, building on the remarkable success of our inaugural
event. (The first online workshop, held in July 2024, attracted over 100
participants and generated significant enthusiasm in the field.)
This second workshop will be held on February 24th, 2025 (
https://wba-initiative.org/en/24521/ ). Registration for presentations
opens on October 20th, 2024, and we eagerly anticipate your submissions of
BRA data.
About This Workshop:
The development of brain-inspired artificial intelligence, which aims to
understand and simulate the computational functions of the brain, is a
promising approach to reproducing human-like problem-solving abilities.
This ambitious goal requires knowledge from diverse research fields,
including neuroscience and cognitive science.
Given the vast amount of knowledge needed, it is crucial to accumulate and
share standardized design information as open knowledge. This workshop
serves as a platform for cooperation and sharing of standardized design
information (BRA data) essential for developing brain-inspired AI.
Additionally, it provides an opportunity to enhance the academic value of
submitted datasets through expert discussions and peer review.
Why Participate:
• Contribute to the cutting-edge field of brain-inspired AI
• Share your research with a global audience of experts
• Gain insights from interdisciplinary discussions
• Potential for your work to be published on the BRA Editorial System
(BRAES) https://ggle.io/6ybj
• Access to standardized data paper templates to ensure high-quality
submissions
We invite submissions of BRA data and accompanying papers. Accepted data
and papers will be published on BRAES, with paper DOIs shared on the
workshop program page. We believe that this sharing and integration of
brain-inspired AI design information will significantly advance the field.
Date and Location (hybrid):
• Date: February 24th, 2025 (Monday)
• Venue: Tokyo, Japan (on-site) and online (details TBA)
Important Dates:
• BRA Data submission opens: October 20th, 2024 (JST)
• Paper abstract submission deadline: November 1st, 2024 (JST)
• BRA Data submission deadline: December 20th, 2024 (JST)
• Full Paper submission deadline: January 4th, 2025 (JST)
• Completed BRA Data submission deadline: January 4th, 2025 (JST)
• Paper notification: January 24th, 2025 (JST)
New Updates:
The submission site for data paper abstracts is now open and accessible at
https://ggle.io/79e3
The data paper template is now available for download at
https://ggle.io/79e5
For detailed submission guidelines, please visit:
https://wba-initiative.org/en/24521/
We look forward to welcoming you and your colleagues to present data and
papers and to engage in stimulating discussions that will shape the future
of brain-inspired AI.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Workshop
organizers at bra-support(a)wba-initiative.org.
Join us in advancing the frontier of brain-inspired artificial intelligence!
Best regards,
BRA Support Team
Oct. 22, 2024
Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
by Grossberg, Stephen
Dear Sara,
I reply below to your claims.
From: Sara A. Solla <sasolla(a)gmail.com>
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 at 5:12 PM
To: Grossberg, Stephen <steve(a)bu.edu>
Cc: André Fabio Kohn via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org>, Stephen Grossberg <steve(a)cns.bu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Comp-neuro] Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
You don't often get email from sasolla(a)gmail.com. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Stephen,
You have been complaining about not getting enough credit since I first met you in the mid 1980s.
That is not true.
You refer to publishing before Hopfield's 1984 paper. You deliberately ignore his 1982 paper, which received 27946 citations:
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, JJ Hopfield
PNAS, April 15, 1982, 79 (8) 2554-2558
My post was originally on a web site with strict word limits. That is why I mentioned Hopfield’s 1984 article, but not his 1982 article.
Section 6 of my 1988 review article:
Grossberg, S. (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures. Neural Networks, 1 , 17-61.
https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1988NN.pdf
reviews Binary, Linear, and Continuous-Nonlinear classical neural network models by many authors.
This article has been cited 2410 times.
Section 6 shows that the 1982 equation that Hopfield used is a variant of the 1943 McCulloch-Pitts model.
The Liapunov function for it is just a discrete version of the Liapunov function for the Additive Model.
In contrast, the 1971 student paper you mentioned received 118 citations.
I assume that you mean:
Grossberg, S. (1971). Embedding fields: Underlying philosophy, mathematics, and applications to psychology, physiology, and anatomy. Journal of Cybernetics, 1, 28-50.
https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971JoC.pdf
This was a review article published in a journal that ceased to exist in 1980 (see below) and thus could not be searched well by Google, which began in 1998.
The article discussed Generalized Additive Models (see its Section 6).
I was able to get articles published proving global limit and oscillation theorems for Generalized Additive Models in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences between 1967 and 1971; e.g.,
Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831.
https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971ProNatAcaSci.pdf
See Equations 1, 2, 3, and 4 etc.
Your 1983 paper with Michael Cohen in IEEE Transaction of Man, Systems, and Cybernetics was received on August 1, 1982, several months after the 1982 paper by Hopfeld had appeared in print. You did get a good number of citations on this paper, 3344, but not as good as 27946.
Michael Cohen and I tried to submit it to the Journal of Cybernetics in 1980.
But there was a glitch in the submission process due to the fact that the Journal of Cybernetics unexpectedly stopped publishing that year and our article got lost in the shuffle, unknown to us for a while.
We resubmitted in 1982, which is why it was published in 1983.
Our results pre-dated Hopfield 1982 and 1984 by two years.
About the difference in citations:
There is a difference between discovery and marketing. I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before and with Michael Cohen before he went around the country lecturing about work that we had previously published, without citation.
You mention a 1982 paper with Michael Cohen; I have not been able to find it.
I think that was a typo. Michael published the following article in 1992:
Cohen, M. A. (1992). The construction of arbitrary stable dynamics in nonlinear neural networks.
Neural Networks, 5, 83 – 103.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0893608005800085
Here is the Abstract:
“In this paper, two methods for constructing systems of ordinary differential equations realizing any fixed finite set of equilibria in any fixed finite dimension are introduced; no spurious equilibria are possible for either method. By using the first method, one can construct a system with the fewest number of equilibria, given a fixed set of attractors. Using a strict Lyapunov function [boldface mine] for each of these differential equations, a large class of systems with the same set of equilibria is constructed. A method of fitting these nonlinear systems to trajectories is proposed. In addition, a general method which will produce an arbitrary number of periodic orbits of shapes of arbitrary complexity is also discussed. A more general second method is given to construct a differential equation which converges to a fixed given finite set of equilibria. This technique is much more general in that it allows this set of equilibria to have any of a large class of indices which are consistent with the Morse Inequalities. It is clear that this class is not universal, because there is a large class of additional vector fields with convergent dynamics which cannot be constructed by the above method. The easiest way to see this is to enumerate the set of Morse indices which can be obtained by the above method and compare this class with the class of Morse indices of arbitrary differential equations with convergent dynamics. The former set of indices are a proper subclass of the latter, therefore, the above construction cannot be universal. In general, it is a difficult open problem to construct a specific example of a differential equation with a given fixed set of equilibria, permissible Morse indices, and permissible connections between stable and unstable manifolds. A strict Lyapunov function is given for this second case as well. This strict Lyapunov function [boldface mine] as above enables construction of a large class of examples consistent with these more complicated dynamics and indices. The determination of all the basins of attraction in the general case for these systems is also difficult and open.”
I have never heard anybody referring to you as 'the father of AI'.
As an acolyte of Hopfield, you wouldn’t.
What I do remember is a visit to your group at BU many, many years ago - in the late 80s or early 90s. I was amazed at finding out that you closely supervised every word in every slide that anybody in your group was allowed to show when invited to give a talk. Everybody was under a lot of pressure to 'stay on message', where the 'message' was your view on things. I had never encountered a scientific group run as a cult. It made an impression, but not a positive one. So much for training over 100 people - by teaching them not to think by themselves.
You describe my devoted teaching as something ugly, even ad hominem.
When I was a student, no one told me how to write an article or how to prepare and give a talk or poster. I developed a method to enable my students to grow intellectually and become independent scholars.
When I started working with a new PhD student or postdoc, we discussed what topics would potentially interest them. Then we read hundreds of psychological and neurobiological articles together about that topic and began to discuss the results in them.
For students interested in engineering and AI, we studied all the methods that were available to solve problems in a targeted problem domain.
I encouraged my students to advance their own concepts about what might be the underlying mechanisms that generated an article’s data or benchmarks. Because we studied large amounts of data, favorite concepts often hit a brick wall and had to be discarded.
We developed a modeling method that I like to call the Method of Minimal Anatomies. See Figure 2.37 in my 2021 Magnum Opus
https://www.amazon.com/Conscious-Mind-Resonant-Brain-Makes/dp/0190070552
This Method is just Occam’s Razor applied to neural networks.
As the Figure summarizes, it “Operationalizes the proper level of abstraction” and “that you cannot ‘derive a brain’ in one step”. Our models have been getting incrementally developed in a principled way to the present time.
Your statement that “the message was your [my] view on things” is the opposite of how we worked.
And how would you know? You were not there.
The proof of the pudding is that all my students got positions that they wanted after they earned their PhD’s with me.
I was also told by multiple famous scientists that our department sent them their best postdoctoral fellows.
In fact, various major labs would contact me to let me know that they had an open position and asked if one of my students was about to graduate.
My students have gone on to successful careers after their postdocs and other first post-PhD positions.
Around half of them went into academe, and the other half into engineering, technology, and AI.
Groups of us have periodically gotten together for happy social events, either at international conferences or in the Boston area.
And they sent me information about their accomplishments and growing families for many years.
As for back-propagation, this is not what Hinton is cited for in the Nobel Prize citation. It is for the Boltzmann machine.
Yes, I know that, and I have also noted that my PhD student, James Williamson, developed statistical neural network models that did not have problems related to deep Learning. I have elsewhere noted that:
Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMS) also have analogs in the Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) family of models, but without the problems that follow from using variants of Deep Learning.
Here are two of them, both developed by my PhD student, James R. Williamson:
Gaussian ARTMAP: A Neural Network for Fast Incremental Learning of Noisy Multidimensional Maps
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0893608095001158
A Constructive, Incremental Learning Network for Mixture Modeling and Classification
http://techlab.bu.edu/files/resources/articles_tt/A%20constructive,%20incre…
Finally, I always wondered: If ART solves all problems, why are there ML/AI problems that remain to be solved?
I would never claim that. I have always taught that science is never done. See the Method of Minimal Anatomies.
The fact that you can even think that about my work shows, sad to say, how biased you have become.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 7:49 AM Grossberg, Stephen via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro@lists.cnsorg.org>> wrote:
Dear Comp-neuro colleagues,
Here are some short summaries of the history of neural network discoveries, as I experienced it, that are relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++THETHE THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HOPFIELD
Here I summarize my concerns about the Hopfield award.
I published articles in 1967 – 1972 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that introduced the Additive Model that Hopfield used in 1984. My articles proved global theorems about the limits and oscillations of my Generalized Additive Models. See sites.bu.edu/steveg<http://sites.bu.edu/steveg> for these articles.
For example:
Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831.
https://lnkd.in/emzwx4Tw
This article illustrates that my mathematical results were part of a research program to develop biological neural networks that provide principled mechanistic explanations of psychological and neurobiological data.
Later, Michael Cohen and I published a Liapunov function that included the Additive Model and generalizations thereof in 1982 and 1983 before Hopfield (1984) appeared.
For example,
Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826.
https://lnkd.in/eAFAdvbu
I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before he published his 1984 article, without citation.
Recall that I started my neural networks research in 1957 as a Freshman at Dartmouth College.
That year, I introduced the biological neural network paradigm, as well as the short-term memory (STM), medium-term memory (MTM), and long-term memory (LTM) laws that are used to this day, including in the Additive Model, to explain data about how brains make minds.
See the review in https://lnkd.in/gJZJtP_W .
When I started in 1957, I knew no one else who was doing neural networks. That is why my colleagues call me the Father of AI.
I then worked hard to create a neural networks community, notably a research center, academic department, the International Neural Network Society, the journal Neural Networks, multiple international conferences on neural networks, and Boston-area research centers, while training over 100 gifted PhD students, postdocs, and faculty to do neural network research. See the Wikipedia page.
That is why I did not have time or strength to fight for priority of my models.
Recently, I was able to provide a self-contained and non-technical overview and synthesis of some of my scientific discoveries since 1957, as well as explanations of the work of many other scientists, in my 2021 Magnum Opus
Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HINTON
Here I summarize my concerns about the Hinton award.
Many authors developed Back Propagation (BP) before Hinton; e.g., Amari (1967), Werbos (1974), Parker (1982), all before Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams (1986).
BP has serious computational weaknesses:
It is UNTRUSTWORTHY (because it is UNEXPLAINABLE).
It is UNRELIABLE (because it can experience CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING.
It should thus never be used in financial or medical applications.
BP learning is also SLOW and uses non-biological NONLOCAL WEIGHT TRANSPORT.
See Figure, right column, top.
In 1988, I published 17 computational problems of BP:
https://lnkd.in/erKJvXFA
BP gradually grew out of favor because other models were better.
Later, huge online databases and supercomputers enabled Deep Learning to use BP to learn.
My 1988 article contrasted BP with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) which I first published in 1976:
https://lnkd.in/evkfq22G
See Figure, right column, bottom.
ART never had BP’s problems.
ART is now the most advanced cognitive and neural theory that explains HOW HUMANS LEARN TO ATTEND, RECOGNIZE, and PREDICT events in a changing world.
ART also explains and simulates data from hundreds of psychological and neurobiological experiments.
In 1980, I derived ART from a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT about how ANY system can AUTONOMOUSLY learn to correct predictive errors in a changing world:
https://lnkd.in/eGWE8kJg
The thought experiment derives ART from a few facts of life that do not mention mind or brain.
ART is thus a UNIVERSAL solution of the problem of autonomous error correction in a changing world.
That is why ART models can be used in designs for AUTONOMOUS ADAPTIVE INTELLIGENCE in engineering, technology, and AI.
ART also proposes a solution of the classical MIND-BODY PROBLEM:
HOW, WHERE in our brains, and WHY from a deep computational perspective, we CONSCIOUSLY SEE, HEAR, FEEL, and KNOW about the world, and use our conscious states to PLAN and ACT to realize VALUED GOALS.
For details, see
Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
Comp-neuro mailing list -- comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro@lists.cnsorg.org>
Mailing list webpage (to subscribe or view archives): https://www.cnsorg.org/comp-neuro-mailing-list
To contact admin/moderators, send an email to: comp-neuro-owner(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro-owner@lists.cnsorg.org>
To unsubscribe, send an email to comp-neuro-leave(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro-leave@lists.cnsorg.org>
Oct. 21, 2024
Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
by Sara A. Solla
Stephen,
You have been complaining about not getting enough credit since I first met
you in the mid 1980s.
You refer to publishing before Hopfield's 1984 paper. You deliberately
ignore his 1982 paper, which received 27946 citations:
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational
abilities, JJ Hopfield
PNAS, April 15, 1982, 79 (8) 2554-2558
In contrast, the 1971 student paper you mentioned received 118 citations.
Your 1983 paper with Michael Cohen in IEEE Transaction of Man, Systems, and
Cybernetics was received on August 1, 1982, several months after the 1982
paper by Hopfeld had appeared in print. You did get a good number of
citations on this paper, 3344, but not as good as 27946.
You mention a 1982 paper with Michael Cohen; I have not been able to find
it.
I have never heard anybody referring to you as 'the father of AI'.
What I do remember is a visit to your group at BU many, many years ago - in
the late 80s or early 90s. I was amazed at finding out that you closely
supervised every word in every slide that anybody in your group was allowed
to show when invited to give a talk. Everybody was under a lot of pressure
to 'stay on message', where the 'message' was your view on things. I had
never encountered a scientific group run as a cult. It made an impression,
but not a positive one. So much for training over 100 people - by teaching
them not to think by themselves.
As for back-propagation, this is not what Hinton is cited for in the Nobel
Prize citation. It is for the Boltzmann machine.
Finally, I always wondered: If ART solves all problems, why are there ML/AI
problems that remain to be solved?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 7:49 AM Grossberg, Stephen via Comp-neuro <
comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org> wrote:
> Dear Comp-neuro colleagues,
>
>
>
> Here are some short summaries of the history of neural network
> discoveries, as I experienced it, that are relevant to the recent Nobel
> Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton:
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++THETHE THE NOBEL
> PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
> FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HOPFIELD
>
> Here I summarize my concerns about the Hopfield award.
>
> I published articles in 1967 – 1972 in the Proceedings of the National
> Academy of Sciences that introduced the Additive Model that Hopfield used
> in 1984. My articles proved global theorems about the limits and
> oscillations of my Generalized Additive Models. See sites.bu.edu/steveg for
> these articles.
>
> For example:
>
> Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural
> networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831.
> https://lnkd.in/emzwx4Tw
>
> This article illustrates that my mathematical results were part of a
> research program to develop biological neural networks that provide
> principled mechanistic explanations of psychological and neurobiological
> data.
>
> Later, Michael Cohen and I published a Liapunov function that included the
> Additive Model and generalizations thereof in 1982 and 1983 before Hopfield
> (1984) appeared.
>
> For example,
>
> Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern
> formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE
> Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826.
> https://lnkd.in/eAFAdvbu
>
> I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before he published his 1984
> article, without citation.
>
> Recall that I started my neural networks research in 1957 as a Freshman at
> Dartmouth College.
>
> That year, I introduced the biological neural network paradigm, as well as
> the short-term memory (STM), medium-term memory (MTM), and long-term memory
> (LTM) laws that are used to this day, including in the Additive Model, to
> explain data about how brains make minds.
>
> See the review in https://lnkd.in/gJZJtP_W .
>
> When I started in 1957, I knew no one else who was doing neural networks.
> That is why my colleagues call me the Father of AI.
>
> I then worked hard to create a neural networks community, notably a
> research center, academic department, the International Neural Network
> Society, the journal Neural Networks, multiple international conferences on
> neural networks, and Boston-area research centers, while training over 100
> gifted PhD students, postdocs, and faculty to do neural network research.
> See the Wikipedia page.
>
> That is why I did not have time or strength to fight for priority of my
> models.
>
> Recently, I was able to provide a self-contained and non-technical
> overview and synthesis of some of my scientific discoveries since 1957, as
> well as explanations of the work of many other scientists, in my 2021
> Magnum Opus
>
> Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
>
> https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
> FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HINTON
>
> Here I summarize my concerns about the Hinton award.
>
> Many authors developed Back Propagation (BP) before Hinton; e.g., Amari
> (1967), Werbos (1974), Parker (1982), all before Rumelhart, Hinton, &
> Williams (1986).
>
> BP has serious computational weaknesses:
>
> It is UNTRUSTWORTHY (because it is UNEXPLAINABLE).
>
> It is UNRELIABLE (because it can experience CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING.
>
> It should thus never be used in financial or medical applications.
>
> BP learning is also SLOW and uses non-biological NONLOCAL WEIGHT TRANSPORT.
>
> See Figure, right column, top.
>
> In 1988, I published 17 computational problems of BP:
> https://lnkd.in/erKJvXFA
>
> BP gradually grew out of favor because other models were better.
>
> Later, huge online databases and supercomputers enabled Deep Learning to
> use BP to learn.
>
> My 1988 article contrasted BP with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) which I
> first published in 1976:
> https://lnkd.in/evkfq22G
>
> See Figure, right column, bottom.
>
> ART never had BP’s problems.
>
> ART is now the most advanced cognitive and neural theory that explains HOW
> HUMANS LEARN TO ATTEND, RECOGNIZE, and PREDICT events in a changing world.
>
>
> ART also explains and simulates data from hundreds of psychological and
> neurobiological experiments.
>
> In 1980, I derived ART from a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT about how ANY system can
> AUTONOMOUSLY learn to correct predictive errors in a changing world:
> https://lnkd.in/eGWE8kJg
>
> The thought experiment derives ART from a few facts of life that do not
> mention mind or brain.
>
> ART is thus a UNIVERSAL solution of the problem of autonomous error
> correction in a changing world.
>
> That is why ART models can be used in designs for AUTONOMOUS ADAPTIVE
> INTELLIGENCE in engineering, technology, and AI.
>
> ART also proposes a solution of the classical MIND-BODY PROBLEM:
>
> HOW, WHERE in our brains, and WHY from a deep computational perspective,
> we CONSCIOUSLY SEE, HEAR, FEEL, and KNOW about the world, and use our
> conscious states to PLAN and ACT to realize VALUED GOALS.
>
> For details, see
>
> Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
>
> https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Comp-neuro mailing list -- comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org
> Mailing list webpage (to subscribe or view archives):
> https://www.cnsorg.org/comp-neuro-mailing-list
>
> To contact admin/moderators, send an email to:
> comp-neuro-owner(a)lists.cnsorg.org
> To unsubscribe, send an email to comp-neuro-leave(a)lists.cnsorg.org
>
Oct. 21, 2024
[Jobs] Postdoc Available in Theoretical Neuroscience
by Michael Furlong
Job Ad – Postdoctoral Researcher in Theoretical Neuroscience
Prof Chris Eliasmith, who holds the Canada Research Chair in Theoretical Neuroscience and heads the Computational Neuroscience Research Group (CNRG) in the Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience (CTN) at the University of Waterloo, is seeking a postdoctoral researcher in Theoretical Neuroscience for a fixed-term appointment.
Description:
The postdoctoral position will be hosted in the CNRG, with a principal focus on neural modeling to build the next version of the Spaun brain model, the world’s largest functional brain model. The project integrates spiking deep neural networks, motor control, probabilistic inference, navigation, perception and cognition to develop a state-of-the-art, large-scale, spiking, whole-brain model. Applicants should have a PhD, with demonstrated skills in at least one of those areas and a willingness to learn about the others.
This project leverages the CNRG’s existing expertise in using neural networks for large-scale brain modeling, originally demonstrated in 2012 with the first version of Spaun. A subsequent version in 2018 significantly extended performance. The latest version currently being built by the CNRG will again break new barriers in the scale and sophistication of whole brain models. Unlike past models, it will be embedded in a sophisticated 3D environment, yet retain the ability to perform a wide variety of tasks, from simple perceptual and motor tasks to challenging intelligence tests. Overall, the long-term goal of the project is to advance the state-of-the-art in large-scale brain models.
Additional Information:
The successful applicant will be housed in the vibrant Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience (CTN), which includes 7 core and 7 affiliated labs focussed on neural modeling and improving our basic understanding of neural computation. The CTN hosts monthly seminars, a yearly ‘Brain Day’ event, a summer school, and regular social activities.
The position is for a fixed term of one year, eight months, with extensions contingent on performance and securing additional funding. Salary is $45,000 - 65,000 CAD per year.
To apply, please send a full CV, 3 references and cover letter explaining your background and fit for the job to: Dr. Chris Eliasmith at celiasmith(a)uwaterloo.ca.
Oct. 21, 2024
Re: "Experienced" history of Neural Networks
by James Bower
argg
I am sorry, typing too fast
Could you change:
Any equally interesting conflict I witnessed first hand (with no horse in the race), which even at that time was full of similar claims of precedence.
I could tell that story too, but instead, I will simply say that Stephen's recent posting made me a bit nostalgic for the days when you were either were in the “email from Stephen claiming prescience club” or not - I thankfully never was.
To
An equally interesting conflict I witnessed first hand (with no horse in the race), which even at that time was full of similar claims of precedence.
I could tell that story too, but instead, I will simply say that Stephen's recent posting made me a bit nostalgic for the days when you were either in the “email from Stephen claiming prescience club” or not - I thankfully never was.
Or I can resubmit
Sorry for the extra work
Jim
Dr. James M. Bower Ph.D.
541-499-7502
Simulating a 17th century landed gentry scientist.
Also:
Affiliate Professor of Biology
Southern Oregon University
Visiting Professor of
Computational Neuroscience
Biocomputation Research Group
School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science
University of Hertfordshire, UK
Linked in <https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-m-bower-130163/>
Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_M._Bower>
> On Oct 21, 2024, at 11:15 AM, James Bower <bowerj(a)sou.edu> wrote:
>
> Any equally interesting conflict I witnessed first hand (with no horse in the race), which even at that time was full of similar claims of precedence.
>
> I could tell that story too, but instead, I will simply say that Stephen's recent posting made me a bit nostalgic for the days when you were either were in the “email from Stephen claiming prescience club” or not - I thankfully never was.
Oct. 21, 2024
Re: "Experienced" history of Neural Networks
by James Bower
opps,
Here is the post with a spelling error corrected.
Thank you
Jim
Being historical myself, I thought I might be appropriate for me to respond briefly to Stephen Grossberg’s recent personal recounting and retelling of history.
To Witt, I sometimes, for fun, refer to myself as the pet neurobiologist in the early days of the neural network movement.
Here is a recent semi-autobiographical (and thus of course certainly somewhat biased) account of those early days I was recently asked to write, which includes how the CNS meeting (as well as this mailing list) emerged from those days.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365925517_NIPS_NeurIPS_and_Neurosc…
(PDF) (NIPS) NeurIPS and Neuroscience: A personal historical perspective
researchgate.net
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365925517_NIPS_NeurIPS_and_Neurosc…
Not included in that account where the other abundant political circumstances surrounding the re-emergence of neural networks, including for example, the revelry between the NIPS meeting and the “International Neural Network Society” and their annual meeting referred to in Stephen Grossberg’s recent post.
Any equally interesting conflict I witnessed first hand (with no horse in the race), which even at that time was full of similar claims of precedence.
I could tell that story too, but instead, I will simply say that Stephen's recent posting made me a bit nostalgic for the days when you were either were in the “email from Stephen claiming prescience club” or not - I thankfully never was.
Anyway, for those interested, from my understanding I think this is a pretty good and balanced history of neural networks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_neural_networks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_neural_networks
What should be clear from that history, and as also mentioned by Stephen, much of the algorithmic basis for ‘machine learning’ today are based on work done many years ago and therefore that most of the recent innovation in the field is not algorithmic but implementation, given faster and faster computers, cheaper and cheaper memory, and massive amounts of data. Given that, very tricky to assign ‘father or’ or for that matter ‘godfather of’ either. :-)
In that light however, one other thing to say, which I could say a lot more about - as will almost certainly be clear in John Hopfield’s Nobel lecture, John was never much interested in the AI implications of his work. From the time I meet him through the rest of his career, he was focused on using the tools he had as a condensed matter physicist to explore questions in biology. In my experience at the time, John was almost uniquely committed to actually understanding the biology, rather than simply imposing his will upon it.
That said, there is no question and as I witnessed it myself, publication of “The Hopfield Network” in 1981, re-ignited interest in an approach to AI that had been strongly resisted by the dons of the field at that time, precisely because it was not “explainable” in the then desired sense. Put another way, the role of the engineer in self-learning networks was not to impose their own predisposed assumptions about how to solve a particular problem (sometimes then, unfortunately extended to claims about how the nervous system works), but instead to construct a system that found a solution to the problem.
Because of its success machine learning has now become the dominant paradigm in real world AI. But, it is now also increasingly being used as a tool to understand the brain. Too long a discussion for that here, but I have serious concerns about those efforts. In fact, I am giving at talk this week at the University of Oregon on a recent example in the neurobiology of olfaction.
It is being webcast, so if anyone is interested, email me and I can send you the URL.
In summary then, there is no question in my mind that John Hopfield’s contribution was unique and deserving of the acclaim he is now receiving - but I have to say I feel even better about his award because he never sought it, or expected it, or campaigned to get it, and in fact, is being rewarded for a consequence of his work that was never the real focus of his efforts.
Good for you John.
Respectfully,
Jim Bower
Dr. James M. Bower Ph.D.
541-499-7502
Simulating a 17th century landed gentry scientist.
Also:
Affiliate Professor of Biology
Southern Oregon University
Visiting Professor of
Computational Neuroscience
Biocomputation Research Group
School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science
University of Hertfordshire, UK
Linked in <https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-m-bower-130163/>
Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_M._Bower>
> On Oct 21, 2024, at 11:10 AM, James Bower <bowerj(a)sou.edu> wrote:
>
> Being historical myself, I thought I might be appropriate for me to respond briefly to Stephen Grossberg’s recent personal recounting and retelling of history.
>
> To Witt, I sometimes, for fun, refer to myself as the pet neurobiologist in the early days of the neural network movement.
>
> Here is a recent semi-autobiographical (and thus of course cretainly somewhat biased) account of those early days I was recently asked to write, which includes how the CNS meeting (as well as this mailing list) emerged from those days.
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365925517_NIPS_NeurIPS_and_Neurosc…
>
> Not included in that account where the other abundant political circumstances surrounding the re-emergence of neural networks, including for example, the revelry between the NIPS meeting and the “International Neural Network Society” and their annual meeting referred to in Stephen Grossberg’s recent post.
>
> Any equally interesting conflict I witnessed first hand (with no horse in the race), which even at that time was full of similar claims of precedence.
>
> I could tell that story too, but instead, I will simply say that Stephen's recent posting made me a bit nostalgic for the days when you were either were in the “email from Stephen claiming prescience club” or not - I thankfully never was.
>
> Anyway, for those interested, from my understanding I think this is a pretty good and balanced history of neural networks.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_neural_networks
>
> What should be clear from that history, and as also mentioned by Stephen, much of the algorithmic basis for ‘machine learning’ today are based on work done many years ago and therefore that most of the recent innovation in the field is not algorithmic but implementation, given faster and faster computers, cheaper and cheaper memory, and massive amounts of data. Given that, very tricky to assign ‘father or’ or for that matter ‘godfather of’ either. :-)
>
> In that light however, one other thing to say, which I could say a lot more about - as will almost certainly be clear in John Hopfield’s Nobel lecture, John was never much interested in the AI implications of his work. From the time I meet him through the rest of his career, he was focused on using the tools he had as a condensed matter physicist to explore questions in biology. In my experience at the time, John was almost uniquely committed to actually understanding the biology, rather than simply imposing his will upon it.
>
> That said, there is no question and as I witnessed it myself, publication of “The Hopfield Network” in 1981, re-ignited interest in an approach to AI that had been strongly resisted by the dons of the field at that time, precisely because it was not “explainable” in the then desired sense. Put another way, the role of the engineer in self-learning networks was not to impose their own predisposed assumptions about how to solve a particular problem (sometimes then, unfortunately extended to claims about how the nervous system works), but instead to construct a system that found a solution to the problem.
>
> Because of its success machine learning has now become the dominant paradigm in real world AI. But, it is now also increasingly being used as a tool to understand the brain. Too long a discussion for that here, but I have serious concerns about those efforts. In fact, I am giving at talk this week at the university of oregon on a recent example in the neurobiology of olfaction.
>
> It is being webcast, so if anyone is interested, email me and I can send you the URL.
>
> In summary then, there is no question in my mind that John Hopfield’s contribution was unique and deserving of the acclaim he is now receiving - but I have to say I feel even better about his award because he never sought it, or expected it, or campaigned to get it, and in fact, is being rewarded for a consequence of his work that was never the real focus of his efforts.
>
> Good for you John.
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Jim Bower
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. James M. Bower Ph.D.
>
> 541-499-7502
>
> Simulating a 17th century landed gentry scientist.
>
> Also:
>
> Affiliate Professor of Biology
> Southern Oregon University
>
> Visiting Professor of
> Computational Neuroscience
> Biocomputation Research Group
> School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science
> University of Hertfordshire, UK
>
> Linked in <https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-m-bower-130163/>
>
> Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_M._Bower>
>
>
>
>
>
Oct. 21, 2024
Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton
by Grossberg, Stephen
Dear Comp-neuro colleagues,
Here are some short summaries of the history of neural network discoveries, as I experienced it, that are relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++THETHE THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HOPFIELD
Here I summarize my concerns about the Hopfield award.
I published articles in 1967 – 1972 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that introduced the Additive Model that Hopfield used in 1984. My articles proved global theorems about the limits and oscillations of my Generalized Additive Models. See sites.bu.edu/steveg<http://sites.bu.edu/steveg> for these articles.
For example:
Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831.
https://lnkd.in/emzwx4Tw
This article illustrates that my mathematical results were part of a research program to develop biological neural networks that provide principled mechanistic explanations of psychological and neurobiological data.
Later, Michael Cohen and I published a Liapunov function that included the Additive Model and generalizations thereof in 1982 and 1983 before Hopfield (1984) appeared.
For example,
Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826.
https://lnkd.in/eAFAdvbu
I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before he published his 1984 article, without citation.
Recall that I started my neural networks research in 1957 as a Freshman at Dartmouth College.
That year, I introduced the biological neural network paradigm, as well as the short-term memory (STM), medium-term memory (MTM), and long-term memory (LTM) laws that are used to this day, including in the Additive Model, to explain data about how brains make minds.
See the review in https://lnkd.in/gJZJtP_W .
When I started in 1957, I knew no one else who was doing neural networks. That is why my colleagues call me the Father of AI.
I then worked hard to create a neural networks community, notably a research center, academic department, the International Neural Network Society, the journal Neural Networks, multiple international conferences on neural networks, and Boston-area research centers, while training over 100 gifted PhD students, postdocs, and faculty to do neural network research. See the Wikipedia page.
That is why I did not have time or strength to fight for priority of my models.
Recently, I was able to provide a self-contained and non-technical overview and synthesis of some of my scientific discoveries since 1957, as well as explanations of the work of many other scientists, in my 2021 Magnum Opus
Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON
FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HINTON
Here I summarize my concerns about the Hinton award.
Many authors developed Back Propagation (BP) before Hinton; e.g., Amari (1967), Werbos (1974), Parker (1982), all before Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams (1986).
BP has serious computational weaknesses:
It is UNTRUSTWORTHY (because it is UNEXPLAINABLE).
It is UNRELIABLE (because it can experience CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING.
It should thus never be used in financial or medical applications.
BP learning is also SLOW and uses non-biological NONLOCAL WEIGHT TRANSPORT.
See Figure, right column, top.
In 1988, I published 17 computational problems of BP:
https://lnkd.in/erKJvXFA
BP gradually grew out of favor because other models were better.
Later, huge online databases and supercomputers enabled Deep Learning to use BP to learn.
My 1988 article contrasted BP with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) which I first published in 1976:
https://lnkd.in/evkfq22G
See Figure, right column, bottom.
ART never had BP’s problems.
ART is now the most advanced cognitive and neural theory that explains HOW HUMANS LEARN TO ATTEND, RECOGNIZE, and PREDICT events in a changing world.
ART also explains and simulates data from hundreds of psychological and neurobiological experiments.
In 1980, I derived ART from a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT about how ANY system can AUTONOMOUSLY learn to correct predictive errors in a changing world:
https://lnkd.in/eGWE8kJg
The thought experiment derives ART from a few facts of life that do not mention mind or brain.
ART is thus a UNIVERSAL solution of the problem of autonomous error correction in a changing world.
That is why ART models can be used in designs for AUTONOMOUS ADAPTIVE INTELLIGENCE in engineering, technology, and AI.
ART also proposes a solution of the classical MIND-BODY PROBLEM:
HOW, WHERE in our brains, and WHY from a deep computational perspective, we CONSCIOUSLY SEE, HEAR, FEEL, and KNOW about the world, and use our conscious states to PLAN and ACT to realize VALUED GOALS.
For details, see
Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind
https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oct. 21, 2024
Arduino for Neuroscience Workshop, Brighton, Nov 20-22th
by Mateusz Kostecki
Hello!
We are happy to announce the first Cambridge Open Lab Workshop, organised
in collaboration with the Open Research Technologies Hub.
Learn how to apply Arduino in your research!
Arduino is a powerful device that you can use to build and program
thousands of devices – from weather stations, through smart house
applications to drones and robots. It has also recently became a powerful
tool used in laboratory – you can use it to control lasers, build automated
mazes or stimulus delivery systems for behavioural experiments – and much
more. It is easy to learn and doesn’t require previous experience with
programming.
During our workshop, you will learn everything you need to start building
your own devices. We will guide you through the topics ranging from basic
electronics, diodes, trough motors and servos to sensors of all types. You
will learn how to use Arduino to control different research devices and
synchronize them!
After the workshop, you will be able to write complex Arduino programs and
have a knowledge of electronics that will allow you to design devices used
in your lab.
Topics:
- Basic electronics – from electrons to laws
- Controlling devices with Arduino – diodes, motors, servos
- Writing code to control lasers in optogenetic experiments
- Synchronizing devices with Arduino
- Sensing environment – light, temperature, and distance sensors
- Wireless communication
- Writing complex code in Arduino
The workshop will take place at University of Sussex Library, Brighton, Nov
20-22 2024 from 9 AM to 6 PM. The cost of the workshop is GBP 150.
Registration form can be found here - https://nenckiopenlab.org/arduino-cam/.
The deadline for registration is Oct 30th.
Best,
Mateusz Kostecki
--
---
Mateusz Kostecki
PhD Student
Knapska Laboratory
Nencki Institute
02-093 Warsaw, Pasteura 3, Poland
https://twitter.com/mtkostecki
https://evolvingbehavior.blog/
Oct. 21, 2024
COSYNE 2025: Abstract submission closes soon; Cosyne DEIA Committee
by Tomas Hromadka
====================================================
Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2025 (Cosyne)
MAIN MEETING
27 March - 30 March 2025
Montreal, Canada
WORKSHOPS
31 March - 01 April 2025
Mont-Tremblant, Canada
www.cosyne.org
====================================================
IMPORTANT DATES
Abstract submission is now open.
Abstract submission deadline: 23 October 2024 11:59pm PST
----------------------------------------------------
COSYNE MEETING & WORKSHOPS
----------------------------------------------------
The annual Cosyne meeting provides an inclusive forum for the exchange of empirical and theoretical approaches to problems in systems neuroscience, in order to understand how neural systems function.
The MAIN MEETING is single-track. A set of invited talks is selected by the Executive Committee, and additional talks and posters are selected by the Program Committee, based on submitted abstracts. The WORKSHOPS feature in-depth discussion of current topics of interest, in a small group setting.
Cosyne topics include but are not limited to: neural basis of behavior, sensory and motor systems, circuitry, learning, neural coding, natural scene statistics, dendritic computation, neural basis of persistent activity, nonlinear receptive field mapping, representations of time and sequence, reward systems, decision-making, synaptic plasticity, map formation and plasticity, population coding, attention, neuromodulation, and computation with spiking networks.
We would like to foster increased participation from experimental groups as well as computational ones. Please circulate widely and encourage your students and postdocs to apply.
When preparing an abstract, authors should be aware that not all abstracts can be accepted for the meeting. Abstracts will be selected based on the clarity with which they convey the substance, significance, and originality of the work to be presented.
----------------------------------------------------
COSYNE DEIA COMMITTEE
----------------------------------------------------
Join our 2025 DEIA Committee for @CosyneMeeting!!!
The Cosyne DEIA Committee is dedicated to fostering inclusivity. We’re seeking 4 new members to contribute to the planning of the 2025 conference and drive inclusive practices.
All career stages are encouraged to join (e.g., faculty, postdocs, and graduate students). For questions, contact the committee co-chairs, Luke Sjulson (@lukesjulson, luke [at] sjulsonlab.org) or Denise Cai (@denisejcai, denisecai [at] gmail.com)
The application deadline is 15 November 2024. Join us and make a lasting impact—apply today! https://forms.gle/gqSNuZj2Cb68UevN9
-----------------------------------------------------
COSYNE 2025 COMMITTEES
-----------------------------------------------------
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE
General Chairs: Bing Brunton (U Washington) and Chandramouli Chandrasekaran (Boston U)
Program Chairs: Tatiana Engel (CSHL) and Kevin Franks (Duke)
Workshop Chairs: SueYeon Chung (NYU) and Guillaume Lajoie (MILA/U Montreal)
Tutorial Chair: Talmo Pereira (Salk)
DEIA Committee: Denise Cai (Mount Sinai) and Luke Sjulson (Albert Einstein)
Undergraduate Travel Chairs: Kimberly Stachenfeld (DeepMind) and Marcelo Mattar (NYU)
Fundraising Chair: Michael Long (NYU)
Social Media Chair: Sabera Talukder (Caltech)
Audio-Video Media Chair: Carlos Stein Brito (Chamaplimaud)
Poster Design: Maja Bialon
PROGRAM COMMITTEE
Tatiana Engel (CSHL) Co-chair
Kevin Franks (Duke) Co-chair
Mikio Aoi (UCSD)
Arkarup Banerjee (CSHL)
Marcus Benna (UCSD)
Adrian Bondy (Princeton)
Timothy Buschman (Princeton)
Celine Cammarata (Duke)
Alex Cayco Gajic (Ecole Normale Superieure)
Hannah Choi (Gatech)
Benjamin Cowley (CSHL)
Carina Curto (Brown)
Brian DePasquale (Boston U)
Sridhar Devarajan (Indian Inst Sci)
Laura Driscoll (Stanford)
Ann Duan (UCL)
Lea Duncker (Stanford)
Annegret Falkner (Princeton)
Arseny Finkelstein (Tel Aviv U)
Rainer Friedrich (Friedrich Miescher Institute)
Juan Gallego (Imperial)
Matthew Golub (U Washington)
Bilal Haider (Georgia Tech)
Kiah Hardcastle (Harvard)
Ann Hermundstad (Janelia)
Michele Insanally (U Pitt)
Monika Jadi (Yale)
Jonathan Kao (UCLA)
Kohitij Kar (York U)
Ann Kennedy (Northwestern)
Guillaume Lajoie (MILA)
Anna Levina (U Tubingen)
Laura Lewis (MIT)
Camilo Libedinsky (National U Singapore)
Ashok Litwin-Kumar (Columbia)
Laureline Logiaco (MIT)
Emily Mace (Max Planck)
Francesca Mastrogiuseppe (Champalimaud)
Luca Mazzucato (U Oregon)
Jorge Mejias (U Amsterdam)
Jonathan Michaels (York U)
Eilif Muller (U Montreal)
James Murray (U Oregon)
Hendrikje Nienborg (NIH)
Gouki Okazawa (Chinese Acad Sci)
Marino Pagan (U Edinburgh)
Hannah Payne (Columbia)
Talmo Pereira (Salk)
Erin Rich (Mount Sinai)
Ben Scott (Boston U)
Nicholas Steinmetz (U Washington)
Carsen Stringer (HHMI)
Marie Suver (Vanderbilt)
Tatjana Tchumatchenko (U Bonn)
John Tuthill (U Washington)
Ali Weber (Bryn Mawr)
Brady Weissbourd (MIT)
Alex Williams (NYU)
Klaus Wimmer (CRM)
Brad Wyble (Penn State)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Stephanie Palmer (U Chicago)
Anne-Marie Oswald (U Pittsburgh)
Alexandre Pouget (U Geneva)
Anthony Zador (CSHL)
CONTACT
meeting [at] cosyne.org
-----------------------------------------------------
COSYNE MAILING LISTS
-----------------------------------------------------
Please consider adding yourself to Cosyne mailing lists (groups) to receive email updates with various Cosyne-related information and join in helpful discussions. See Cosyne.org -> About-> Mailing lists for details.
Oct. 20, 2024
Post-doctoral Fellow Position available in National University of Singapore
by sc.phua@nus.edu.sg
Postdoctoral Fellow Position in the Neuron Signaling Laboratory, NUS, Singapore
We are actively seeking a Postdoctoral Fellow to join us in the following project (This position will be co-supervised with a PI from the Biomedical Engineering Department):
Investigating a transcriptional role of primary cilia in striatal neural computation mediating cognitive flexibility
Qualifications:
The candidate should hold or is going to obtain a PhD in one of the disciplines below:
- Biomedical engineering, systems neuroscience, computational neuroscience or related fields.
- At least one first-author research publication in a peer-reviewed journal
Skills:
- Strong motivation and leadership in pursuing challenging scientific questions
- An ability to work well with interdisciplinary colleagues
- Experience in mentoring and training junior researchers
- Excellent written and interpersonal communication skills
- Good time and resource management skills
Experience:
- High proficiency in Python/Matlab (essential requirement)
• Preferably experience working with neural data (spikes, calcium imaging) at scale
• Some background in machine learning with strong grounding in statistical methods
• Familiarity with techniques for dimensionality reduction
- Expertise in in vivo brain recording techniques, e.g. microendoscopy, electrophysiology, fiber photometry
- Expertise in rodent stereotaxic surgeries
Candidates should email (i) a description of research interests, (ii) a CV and (iii) the names of 3 references to Dr. Phua at sc.phua(a)nus.edu.sg . The position is available immediately but we will wait for the candidate with the ideal combination of skills and interests.
Oct. 19, 2024
Two Tenure-Track faculty positions in Applied Mathematics, UW Seattle
by Eric Shea-Brown
Hello comp neuro colleagues!
Sharing news of two tenure-track assistant professor positions in at UW Applied Mathematics, in Seattle. Please apply by 10/31! Details here:
https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/list/25055
Yours,
Eric
________________
Eric Shea-Brown (he/him)
Professor, Applied Mathematics + Physiology and Biophysics, ECE
Co-director, Computational Neuroscience Center
University of Washington
Oct. 18, 2024
One week left: Research Summit on Open Problems for AI (Euston, London, Oct 23-24th)
by Battleday, Ruairidh
AE Autumn Summit on Open Problems for AI. Friends House, Euston, London,
Oct 23-24.
What are the next set of challenges for AI algorithms? What are the open
problems in application?
Join the UK’s leading AI researchers, policy makers, and entrepreneurs in
this global summit.
One week left until the Summit! Some tickets sold out, others still
available!
www.algopreneurship.org
Day 1 (Oct 23rd) - Algorithms
We’ll be hearing from Professor Karl Friston
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_J._Friston> (UCL & Verses.ai
<http://verses.ai/>), Professor Claudia Clopath
<https://profiles.imperial.ac.uk/c.clopath> (Imperial), Dr Katja Hofman
<https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/people/kahofman/>n (Microsoft), Dr
Martin Riedmiller <https://sites.google.com/view/riedmiller/home> (Google
DeepMind), Professor Tim Rocktäschel <https://rockt.github.io/> (Google
DeepMind & UCL)
Panels on Fundamental AI research challenges (University of Oxford,
DeepMind, Meta <https://ai.meta.com/research/fair-paris/>, XTX Markets
<https://xtxmarkets.com/>);
New Kinds of AI Research Institution (Kings AI Institute
<https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ai>, <https://www.aria.org.uk/>Alan Turing Institute
<https://www.turing.ac.uk/>, Advanced Research and Invention Agency
<https://www.aria.org.uk/>, Ellison Institute <https://eit.org/>,
<https://www.airstreet.com/>Cambridge Consultants
<https://www.cambridgeconsultants.com/>)
Day 2 (Oct 24th) - Applications
Professor Sana Khareghani
<https://rai.ac.uk/team/professor-sana-khareghani-2/> (RAI
<https://rai.ac.uk/> & KCL), James Donovan
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-donovan-111a7a122/> (OpenAI), Professor
Mounia Lalmas
<https://research.atspotify.com/2020/09/mounia-lalmas-roelleke/> (Spotify), Dr
Olvier Vince
<https://theorg.com/org/basecamp-research/org-chart/oliver-vince> (Basecamp
Research <https://basecamp-research.com/>), Professor Eiman Kanjo
<https://profiles.imperial.ac.uk/e.kanjo> (tinyML/Imperial/Nottingham
Trent), Danny Gray <https://jaaq.org/creator/35911> (Just Ask A Question
<https://jaaq.org/home>), Tarig Hilal
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/tarighilal/> (Akord AI <https://cdi.akord.org/>),
Ashley Ramrachia <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashley-ramrachia-0988675/> (
Academy <https://academy.tech/>), Dr Chanuki Illushka Seresinhe
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/chanukiseresinhe/> (Boon/beautifulplaces.ai)
Future Leaders Breakout Rooms (UKRI, Future Leaders Development Network
<https://www.flfdevnet.com/>, No, 10 Downing Street Data Team, Tony Blair
Institute <https://www.institute.global/>, Zeki
<https://www.thezeki.com/>, Octopus
ventures <https://octopusventures.com/>, Entrepreneur First
<https://www.joinef.com/>, Financial Times),
Panels on AI and Education Panel (Raspberry Pi
<https://www.raspberrypi.org/>, Inversity <https://inversity.co/welcome>,
micro:bit <https://microbit.org/>, memrise <https://www.memrise.com/en-us/>,
Five Arrows <https://www.rothschildandco.com/en/five-arrows/>);
Challenges for AI in Biomedicine Panel (KCL, QMU, Alan Turing Institute, Sonus
AI <https://decorte.co.uk/>, Basecamp Research
<https://www.basecamp-research.com/>, RedAlpine <https://www.redalpine.com/>
)
Student tickets: £10
General: £30
This should be an exciting and productive event, and we expect an audience
of 1000 of the UK best AI researchers, policy makers, and entrepreneurs, at
student, early stage, and full career levels.
--
Dr Ruairidh McLennan Battleday BMBCh (Oxon) PhD
President
Thinking About Thinking, Inc <https://thinkingaboutthinking.org>
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Center for Brain Science,
Harvard University
Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines,
MIT
Oct. 17, 2024
School on the Origins of Life, Behavior and Cognition
by Ahmed El Hady
*School on the Origins of Life, Behavior and Cognition*
*March 10-21, 2025*
*ICTP-SAIFR, São Paulo, Brazil*
*/Application Deadline:/ December 28, 2024*
School on Origins is an interdisciplinary school that tackles the
foundational questions concerning the origins of biophysical systems
which include but are not limited to : molecular, cellular, neural and
behavioral systems. We aim to find principles shared across systems
using tools from statistical physics, mathematical analysis and
numerical simulations to explore these questions. We have invited
researchers that work both on the experimental and theoretical side to
cover a variety of biophysical systems and theoretical approaches. The
school is aimed at graduate students either at the master’s or PhD level
who have a strong quantitative background and a keen interest to pursue
interdisciplinary research.
We invite students pursuing degrees in physics, computer science,
engineering, or mathematics. Those pursuing degrees in biology need to
provide evidence of strong and extensive quantitative background in
topics such as calculus, dynamical systems and numerical programming.
/There is no registration fee and limited funds are available for travel
and local expenses./
*Organizers:*
* *Ahmed El Hady* (Cluster of Excellence Centre for the Advanced Study
of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Germany.)
* *Antonio C. Roque* (USP Ribeirão Preto, Brazil)
* *Daniel Y. Takahashi* (UFRN, Brazil)
*Lecturers:*
* *Suzanne Still* (University of Hawaii at Mānoa, USA)
* *Randall Beer* (Indiana University Bloomington, USA)
* *Asif Ghazanfar* (Princeton University, USA)
* *Don Katz* (Brandeis University, USA)
* *Gandhimohan M. Viswanathan* (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do
Norte – UFRN, Brazil)
* *Bruno Mota* (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
* *Ana Amador* (University of Buenos Aires, Argentina )
All details and application procedure can be found here:
https://www.ictp-saifr.org/solbc2025/
All the best,
Ahmed El Hady
Dr. Ahmed El Hady
Research Group Leader
Cluster for Advanced Study of Collective Behavior
University of Konstanz / Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior
Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz
Room ZT 907
Postbox 687
Tel.: +49 7531 88-4742
Oct. 17, 2024
PhD/postdoc positions in NeuroAI
by Adam Gosztolai
Dear Comp-neuro community,
I would like to inform you about PhD and postdoc opportunities in my lab in Vienna. We are the Dynamics of Neural Systems Lab, currently generously supported by an ERC Starting grant.
We have several exciting projects at the interface of neuro, mathematical modelling (geometry and dynamical systems) and ML. All have broad impact in fundamental ML theory and neuroscience and translational impact in neuroprosthetic interfaces. I also have an open project for someone with strong mathematical and programming skills, e.g., to develop a project like MARBLE (https://arxiv.org/html/2304.03376v3) at the interface of dynamical systems, probabilistic modelling and deep learning.
More details on the projects can be found here: https://www.gosztolai-lab.org/news/2024/09/15/Hiring.html
Would you be so kind to circulate this among colleagues and interested students? They can contact me directly with questions.
All the best,
Adam
—————
Adam Gosztolai
Group leader
AI Institute
Medical University of Vienna
Research Affiliate
McGovern Institute for Brain Research
MIT
gosztolai-lab.org
Oct. 17, 2024
Open PhD Position at El-Boustani Lab - University of Geneva (Switzerland)
by sami El-Boustani
The El-Boustani Lab at the University of Geneva is looking for a highly motivated PhD student to research the plasticity mechanisms underlying the learning of goal-directed sensorimotor associations in mice.
This project involves whole-brain mappings, two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal populations, as well as dendritic spine imaging in mice during the acquisition of perceptual decision-making tasks. Genetically encoded tools will be used to dissect the circuits that contribute to the learning of these tasks, and state-of-the-art behavioral modeling will help infer the timescales of synaptic plasticity. Successful applicant will contribute to a collaborative research program focused on understanding how changes in specific sensorimotor synapses underpin the acquisition of new associations.
We welcome applicants with diverse quantitative backgrounds, including but not limited to neuroscience, mathematics, physics, and engineering. We are especially interested in applicants with excellent programming skills (e.g., MATLAB, Python), and experience with mouse behavior and/or imaging techniques through cranial windows. Switzerland offers a vibrant neuroscience community with outstanding research conditions and attractive salaries.
Candidates should send their CV, at least two references and a brief cover letter describing their previous work and future goals to Sami El-Boustani: <mailto:sami.el-boustani@unige.ch> sami.el-boustani(a)unige.ch<mailto:sami.el-boustani@unige.ch>.
Please visit http://elboustani-lab.org/ for more details.
Oct. 16, 2024
2-year postdoc at Neurospin/INM, Paris: Deep phenotyping of learning and decision-making 7T MRI, MEG & computational modeling
by Alexander Paunov
2-YEAR POSTDOCTORAL POSITION AVAILABLE AT NEUROSPIN/INM (PARIS, FRANCE)
https://florentmeyniel.weebly.com/uploads/5/9/7/2/59727215/ad_recruitment_p…
Project
Deep phenotyping of learning and decision-making 7T MRI, MEG & computational modeling
Supervisor and contact
Dr Florent MEYNIEL
https://www.unicog.org/lab/the-computational-brain/
Duration and Dates
* Initial duration: two years
* Extension possible
* Full-time post
* Preferred starting date: January 2025
Project description
Learning and decision making are intertwined processes in many everyday situations. One example is when you decide where to have lunch: should you go to the nearby coffee shop or to the university cafeteria? Learning depends on choice, because you can learn which option you prefer by trying each option repeatedly, and decision making depends on learning, because you eventually want to select the option you have learned you like best. Uncertainty plays a key role in both learning1–4 and decision making5, especially when the environment is not stationary (e.g., a new brand now runs the nearby coffee shop and you like it less).
In the CEA-funded EXPLORE+ collaborative project, we are interested in characterizing the neural representation of uncertainty6–8 and value that emerge from learning and guide decisions. Our approach follows a deep phenotyping approach, attempting to characterize each subject with a large multimodal dataset. We collected data from 16 participants who participated in one behavioral session, two 7T fMRI sessions, and two MEG sessions. The large number of trials allows us to estimate and test different computational models of the decision and learning processes. The 7T MRI and MEG data provide access to the topographical organization of neural representations and their dynamics, respectively, to better understand learning and decision making.
One postdoc is currently working on the fMRI data, and we are looking for another postdoc for the MEG dataset. Both postdocs will work together to perform analyses informed by both modalities.
The EXPLORE+ project will continue with another previously funded project called BrainSync, which will collect data from 11.7 fMRI and intracranial recordings using the same task, providing an opportunity to extend the current work.
Profile
Ph.D. in neuroscience, machine learning or psychology, with good programming skills (ideally Python). Previous experience with ideally MEG, EEG or alternatively fMRI, computational modeling. You will be responsible for data analysis (mainly MEG, also fMRI-MEG in collaboration with Alexander Paunov, postdoc working on the fMRI part) and dissemination of results in internal seminars, international conferences and journal articles.
The working language of the lab is English. French is not required.
Workplace and environment
Dr Florent MEYNIEL leads the Computational Brain team (more info here), which is located in two places.
* Institute of NeuroModulation (INM), Sainte Anne Hospital, Paris, France. The INM is part of the GHU Paris, Psychiatry & Neurosciences. The INM combines clinical activities and innovative clinical research in psychiatry with basic research in computational neuroscience. Team members spend most of their days here.
* NeuroSpin, Paris-Saclay Campus, France. NeuroSpin is part of the CEA (Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique). Directed by Prof. Stanislas DEHAENE, NeuroSpin is a world-class brain imaging center equipped with a MEG system (Elekta, Neuromag) and several human MRI scanners (3T Prisma, 7T and 11.7T), all for research purposes only. The community at NeuroSpin is very stimulating, combining MRI physicists, machine learning experts, and cognitive neuroscientists. Team members go there to collect data and collaborate with their colleagues in the Cognitive NeuroImaging Unit.
Application procedure
Please send an email to Florent Meyniel (florent.meyniel(a)cea.fr) and Alexander Paunov (alexander.paunov(a)gmail.com)
* Your CV
* a research statement (what you like and want to do)
* the contact details of two referees
Applications will be considered on a rolling basis (positions will remain open until filled).
Salary
According to CEA standards. According to experience.
References
1. Meyniel, F., Schlunegger, D. & Dehaene, S. The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account. PLoS Comput Biol 11, e1004305 (2015).
2. Meyniel, F., Sigman, M. & Mainen, Z. F. Confidence as Bayesian Probability: From Neural Origins to Behavior. Neuron 88, 78–92 (2015).
3. Foucault, C. & Meyniel, F. Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities. Open Mind 8, 615–638 (2024).
4. Meyniel, F. Brain dynamics for confidence-weighted learning. PLOS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007935 (2020).
5. Paunov, A. et al. Multiple and subject-specific roles of uncertainty in reward-guided decision-making. 2024.03.27.587016 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.27.587016 (2024).
6. Walker, E. Y. et al. Studying the neural representations of uncertainty. Nat. Neurosci. 1–11 (2023) doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01444-y.
7. Bounmy, T., Eger, E. & Meyniel, F. A characterization of the neural representation of confidence during probabilistic learning. NeuroImage 268, 119849 (2023).
8. Meyniel, F. & Dehaene, S. Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 201615773 (2017) doi:10.1073/pnas.1615773114.
Oct. 15, 2024
Call for Workshop Proposals on Complex Systems at FRCCS 2025
by Hocine Cherifi
The organizing committee of *Fr*ance’s International *C*onference on *C*
omplex *S*ystems (FRCCS 2025 <https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/>)
invites proposals for full- or half-day workshops on current or emerging
topics in Complex Systems. Workshops provide an interactive platform for
in-depth exploration of novel issues or application domains, fostering
collaboration across disciplines. We especially welcome multidisciplinary
workshops that engage both researchers and practitioners.
*Workshop Date:* May 21-23, 2025
*Proposal Deadline:* January 12, 2024
*Workshop Format & Duration*
We encourage diverse formats beyond traditional paper presentations,
including:
- *Discussions*, *demos*, *panels*, and *challenge sessions*.
- *Full-day workshops*: 7 hours, including two 30-minute breaks.
- *Half-day workshops*: 4 hours, including one 30-minute break.
*Organizer Responsibilities*
Workshop organizers are responsible for managing their sessions
independently, which includes drafting and disseminating the Call for
Papers (CFP) for their workshops, reviewing submitted papers, and
coordinating with participants.
*Proposal Guidelines (2-4 pages in PDF)*
Proposals should include the following details:
1. *Title*
2. *Overview*: Key issues, relevance, and associated research areas.
3. *Organizers*: Names, affiliations, and contact information (with one
primary contact).
4. *Workshop Format*: Planned structure (talks, panels, etc.).
5. *Duration*: Half-day or full-day.
6. *Call for Submissions* (optional draft).
7. *Expected Submissions and Participants*
8. *Speakers*: Confirmed or pre-contacted (if applicable).
9. *Logistics Needs* (e.g., poster stands, AV equipment).
*Incentives*
Workshops with more than ten registered contributions will receive a waived
registration fee for one organizer or invited speaker.
*Important Dates*
- *Proposal Submission Deadline* : January 12, 2024
- *Acceptance Notification* : January 26, 2024
- *Workshop Paper Submission Deadline*: March 20, 2024
- *Author Notification* : April 17, 2024
*Submission Link*
Submit your proposal via: https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/FRCCS2025/.
Choose the "Workshop Proposal" track.
*Publication*
Workshop contributions will be included in the FRCCS 2025 conference
companion book (with ISBN). Selected submissions may be invited for
publication in partner journals.
*Why Organize a Workshop?*
By organizing a workshop, you will:
- Shape discussions on cutting-edge topics in Complex Systems.
- Build networks with leading researchers and practitioners.
- Promote interdisciplinary collaboration and share your expertise with
an engaged audience.
*We look forward to receiving your innovative and exciting workshop
proposals!*
For more details, visit:
https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/workshops-proposals/
Or contact the workshop chair
Maria Malek
maria.malek(a)cyu.fr
Join us at COMPLEX NETWORKS 2024 <https://www.complexnetworks.org/>
*-------------------------*
Hocine CHERIFI
University of Burgundy Franche-Comté
Laboratoire* I*nterdisciplinaire *C*arnot de *B*ourgogne - ICB UMR 6303 CNRS
Editor in Chief Plos Complex Systems
<https://plos.org/complex-systems-research-journal/#:~:text=PLOS%20Complex%2….>
Founding & Adisory Editor Applied Network Science
<https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/>
Editorial Board member PLOS One <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/>, IEEE
ACCESS <https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/?http%3A%2F%2Fieeeaccess_ieee_org%2F>,
Scientific
Reports <https://www.nature.com/srep/>,
Journal of Imaging <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jimaging>, Quality and
Quantity <https://www.springer.com/journal/11135/>, Computational Social
Networks <https://computationalsocialnetworks.springeropen.com/>,
Complex Systems <https://www.complex-systems.com/>
Oct. 15, 2024
Brains in Space - A virtual colloquium on spatial navigation
by Vinita Samarasinghe
On behalf of Sen Cheng, Sandhiya Vijayabaskaran and Laurenz Wiskott from
the Institute of Neural Computation, Faculty for Computer Science, Ruhr
University Bochum, I invite you to attend a colloquium series "*Brains
in Space: An Interdisciplinary Research Colloquium on Spatial Navigation*".
In this colloquium, speakers will present their research in various
areas of spatial navigation, including behavioral, neuroscientific, and
theoretical approaches. The goal is to foster interdisciplinary
discussions along the lines of the review article "A Map of Spatial
Navigation for Neuroscience" (Parra-Barrero et al., 2023) that proposes
a taxonomy of spatial navigation processes in mammals. The talks will
cover a diverse range of topics, from the neural underpinnings of
navigation to complex navigation behaviors. Attendees will gain a better
understanding of how the mammalian brain represents and navigates
through space, as well as learn about several cognitive processes such
as learning and memory through the lens of spatial navigation.
The colloquium takes place virtually on Tuesday's from 16:00 to 17:30
(CET) and the complete schedule can be found at
https://www.ini.rub.de/teaching/courses/colloquium_brains_in_space_an_inter…
. The first talk is on October 29th 2024.*
*
*Confirmed speakers include:* Arne Ekstrom, Klaus Gramann, Michael
Hornberger, Russell Epstein, Ed Manley and Behnam Ghazinouri.
This colloquium is open to the public. Please feel free to forward this
information to any of your colleagues who may be interested.
Zoom link:
https://ruhr-uni-bochum.zoom-x.de/j/67839364827?pwd=RfcIgK8OUfjkwWTNCf80ARX…
[Meeting ID: 678 3936 4827; Passcode: 841644]
October 29th: *Klaus Gramann* - TU Berlin
*Title:* Mobile Brain/Body Imaging in Actively Navigating Humans
*Abstract:* The human brain is embodied, intertwined with our physical
form, leveraging this embodiment to enhance perception in complex and
dynamically changing environments. Traditional brain imaging techniques
have largely ignored these aspects of embodied cognition. However,
recent years have witnessed a significant paradigm shift, with
established brain imaging technologies being employed outside
conventional experimental frameworks to record brain dynamics in
actively behaving individuals. This evolution in research methodologies
introduces new challenges in both hardware and analytical approaches but
allows for unprecedented insights into human brain activity underlying
natural cognition. In this presentation, I will provide an overview of
research in the Berlin Mobile Brain/Body Imaging Labs that focus on the
neural dynamics underlying human navigation using mobile EEG
technologies. Utilizing Mobile Brain/Body Imaging (MoBI), I will present
findings from experiments that examine multisensory integration during
navigation, both within classical laboratory protocols and in scenarios
that permit full-body movement in virtual and real-world settings. The
results reveal substantial changes in brain dynamics in actively
behaving participants compared to traditional brain imaging
configurations, highlighting important implications for future research
directions.
We look forward to seeing you.
Kind regards,
Vinita
--
Vinita Samarasinghe
Science Manager
Arbeitsgruppe Computational Neuroscience
Institut für Neuroinformatik
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, NB 3/73
Postfachnummer 110
Universitätstr. 150
D-44801 Bochum
Tel: +49 (0)234 32 27996
Email:samarasinghe@ini.rub.de
Oct. 15, 2024
Faculty position in Mathematical Biology
by Alla R Borisyuk
The Department of Mathematics at the University of Utah has an OPEN RANK
FACULTY POSITION search in Mathematical Biology (including Computational
Neuroscience). Please help us spread the word by forwarding this
announcement to anyone who might be interested. For the official job
announcement please see
www.mathjobs.org/jobs/UofUtah/TTMATHBIO and please let us know if you have
any questions.
Alla Borisyuk
Professor
Department of Mathematics
University of Utah
Oct. 14, 2024
Creating an inclusive and anti-racist academia – Online Panel Discussion and Q&A – 28th October, 1pm GMT / 2pm CET
by Sidarus, Nura
Creating an inclusive and anti-racist academia
Online Panel Discussion with Q&A
Monday, October 28
1-2pm GMT / 2-3pm CET
Details & registration: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/1027101356807
Despite ongoing efforts to promote anti-racism and equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), systemic inequalities persist and academic work often remains limited to Western perspectives, neglecting the rich diversity of global knowledge systems. Women in Cognitive Science-Europe<https://www.womenincogsci.org/wics-europe> is organising this discussion on occasion of the United Kingdom’s Black History Month, making time to recognise the contribution of Black scholars and thought, and foster conversations that challenge the cultural narratives and practices that marginalise people of colour. We believe we all need to work together to fight against all types of discrimination and marginalisation. Panelists will provide evidence and showcase ongoing initiatives to promote a more inclusive and anti-racist academia. Attendees will gain insights into these issues and be inspired to take action in their own contexts.
Panelists:
* Prof. Felix Ameka, Leiden University, The Netherlands
* Prof. Narender Ramnani, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
* Dr. Nura Sidarus, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
Join us and help us spread the word about this event.
Everyone is welcome!
Details & registration: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/1027101356807
__________________________________________________________
Dr Nura Sidarus (she/her)
Lecturer | Chair of Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Team
Department of Psychology | Office: Wolfson 248
Royal Holloway University of London | Egham | TW20 0EX
Affiliate Member | Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL
Computations in Agency and Metacognition Lab<https://www.compagencymeta.com/>
nura.sidarus(a)rhul.ac.uk<mailto:%20nura.sidarus@rhul.ac.uk> | Personal Website<http://www.nurasidarus.com/>
__________________________________________________________
This email, its contents and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. In certain circumstances, it may also be subject to legal privilege. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. If you have received this email in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in personal emails are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Royal Holloway, University of London. It is your responsibility to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free.
Oct. 14, 2024
Apply to the Bertalanffy Doctoral Student Award @ FRCCS 2025
by Hocine Cherifi
*DOCTORAL STUDENT AWARD*
<https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/doctoral-student-award/>
*@ **FRCCS 2025* <https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/>
The Bertalanffy Doctoral Student Award is part of CSS FRANCE's
<https://www.cssfrance.org/> global initiative to support early career
researchers in their quest to advance the frontiers of science across a
broad range of disciplines. It is in place to recognize early career
contributions and leadership in research in Complex Systems related fields.
It is awarded to young researchers enrolled in a Ph.D. program.
This competition consists of presenting your research in simple terms in a
five-minute video to a lay audience. Your presentation should be clear,
concise, and convincing.
*Eligibility*
- Eligible candidates must:
- Be under 30.
- Be enrolled in a Ph.D. program in whatever discipline Complex Systems
covers.
- Commit to presenting their work at France's International Conference
on Complex Systems <https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/> ( FRCCS
2025) <https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/> if awarded
- Accept and authorize the use and distribution of videos and photos
related to the competition, including on social networks
- Have informed their thesis supervisor of their participation in the
competition
- Present a sufficiently advanced state of the doctoral research project
- Individuals may only be candidates for this award once in their
lifetime.
*Important dates*
· Application deadline: *March 11, 2025*
· Notification to applicants: *April 02, 2025*
*Application Instruction*
The application package must contain the following:
- A CV of the candidate (maximum two pages)
- A summary (maximum two pages) presenting the research work, its
context, main contribution, and scientific impact.
- A 5-minute video presentation.
*Application Process*
Applications are made via a Google form on the online portal.
<https://forms.gle/CEGYgJFV8MoiSQS36>
*Note that Google Forms requires you to be signed in to a Google account to
upload files and submit your responses. *
*Selection Process*
FRCCS Award Committee will evaluate all qualified candidates and propose
the winner to the Advisory Board of CSS FRANCE, which will make the final
decision.
*Award Procedure*
· The awardee will be recognized and present their work at FRCCS 2025
<https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/>.
· The awardee will receive a 500-euro prize.
· If the awardee is not an author at FRCCS 2025
<https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/>, the prize will include an
additional coverage of their registration fee.
· If the awardee has an accepted submission to FRCCS 2025
<https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/>,, they need to pay the
registration fee for their contribution.
For more information, contact: hocine.cherifi(a)gmail.com
Join us at COMPLEX NETWORKS 2024 <https://www.complexnetworks.org/>
*-------------------------*
Hocine CHERIFI
University of Burgundy Franche-Comté
Laboratoire* I*nterdisciplinaire *C*arnot de *B*ourgogne - ICB UMR 6303 CNRS
Editor in Chief Plos Complex Systems
<https://plos.org/complex-systems-research-journal/#:~:text=PLOS%20Complex%2….>
Founding & Adisory Editor Applied Network Science
<https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/>
Editorial Board member PLOS One <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/>, IEEE
ACCESS <https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/?http%3A%2F%2Fieeeaccess_ieee_org%2F>,
Scientific
Reports <https://www.nature.com/srep/>,
Journal of Imaging <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jimaging>, Quality and
Quantity <https://www.springer.com/journal/11135/>, Computational Social
Networks <https://computationalsocialnetworks.springeropen.com/>,
Complex Systems <https://www.complex-systems.com/>
Oct. 14, 2024
CFP FRCCS 2025 Bordeaux, France May 21 – 23, 2025
by Hocine Cherifi
Fifth France’s International* C*onference on* C*omplex* S*ystems
May 21 – 23, 2025
Bordeaux, France
*FRCCS 2025* <https://iutdijon.u-bourgogne.fr/ccs-france/>
The fifth edition of France’s International Conference on Complex Systems
(FRCCS 2025) will be held in Bordeaux, France. This single-track
international conference serves as a platform to foster interdisciplinary
exchanges among researchers from various scientific disciplines and diverse
backgrounds, including sociology, economics, history, management,
archaeology, geography, linguistics, statistics, mathematics, and computer
science.
FRCCS 2025 allows participants to meet yearly in France, exchange and
promote ideas, and facilitate the cross-fertilization of recent research
work, industrial advancements, and original applications. Moreover, the
conference emphasizes research topics with a high societal impact,
showcasing the significance of complexity science in addressing complex
societal challenges.
You are cordially invited to submit your contribution by *February 21,
2025.*
Finalized work (published or unpublished) and work in progress are welcome.
Three types of contributions are accepted:
· *Long Papers* about *original research* (up to 12 pages)
· *Short Papers *about* original research* (up to 8 pages)
· *Extended Abstract* about *published or unpublished* research (3 to
4 pages).
*Keynote Speakers*
· Elsa Arcaute, <https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/casa> University College
London, UK
· Ulrik Brandes <https://sn.ethz.ch/> ETH Zürich Switzerland
· Mikko Kivelä, <http://www.mkivela.com/> Aalto University, Finland
· Caterina La Porta, <https://www.oncolab.unimi.it/about-caterina/>
University of Milan, Italy
· *More TBA…*
*Publication*
o *Papers *will be included in the conference *proceedings edited by
Springer*
o *Extended abstracts* will be included in the book of abstracts (With
ISBN)
o *Selected submissions of unpublished work will be invited for
publication in special issues (fast track procedure) **of the journals:*
o Applied Network Science, <https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/>
edited by Springer
o Frontiers in Big Data <https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/big-data>
edited by Frontiers
*Submission *
· Submit on CMT Microsoft at:
https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/FRCCS2025/
<https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/FRCCS2025/>
· *Select the Track: FRCCS2025*
*Topics include, but are not limited to: *
· *Foundations of complex systems *
- Self-organization, non-linear dynamics, statistical physics,
mathematical modeling and simulation, conceptual frameworks, ways of
thinking, methodologies and methods, philosophy of complexity, knowledge
systems, Complexity and information, Dynamics and self-organization,
structure and dynamics at several scales, self-similarity, fractals
- *Complex Networks *
- Structure & Dynamics, Multilayer and Multiplex Networks, Adaptive
Networks, Temporal Networks, Centrality, Patterns, Cliques, Communities,
Epidemics, Rumors, Control, Synchronization, Reputation, Influence, Viral
Marketing, Link Prediction, Network Visualization, Network
Digging, Network
Embedding & Learning.
- *Neuroscience, **Linguistics*
- Evolution of language, social consensus, artificial intelligence,
cognitive processes & education, Narrative complexity
- *Economics & Finance*
- Game Theory, Stock Markets and Crises, Financial Systems, Risk
Management, Globalization, Economics and Markets, Blockchain, Bitcoins,
Markets and Employment
- *Infrastructure, planning, and environment *
- critical infrastructure, urban planning, mobility, transport and
energy, smart cities, urban development, urban sciences
- *Biological and (bio)medical complexity *
- biological networks, systems biology, evolution, natural sciences,
medicine and physiology, dynamics of biological coordination, aging
- *Social complexity*
o social networks, computational social sciences, socio-ecological
systems, social groups, processes of change, social evolution,
self-organization and democracy, socio-technical systems, collective
intelligence, corporate and social structures and dynamics, organizational
behavior and management, military and defense systems, social unrest,
political networks, interactions between human and natural systems,
diffusion/circulation of knowledge, diffusion of innovation
- *Socio-Ecological Systems*
- Global environmental change, green growth, sustainability &
resilience, and culture
- *Organisms and populations *
- Population biology, collective behavior of animals, ecosystems,
ecology, ecological networks, microbiome, speciation, evolution
- *Engineering systems and systems of systems*
- bioengineering, modified and hybrid biological organisms,
multi-agent systems, artificial life, artificial intelligence, robots,
communication networks, Internet, traffic systems, distributed
control, resilience, artificial resilient systems, complex systems
engineering, biologically inspired engineering, synthetic biology
- *Complexity in physics and chemistry*
- quantum computing, quantum synchronization, quantum chaos, random
matrix theory
- *Machine learning and AI in the context of Complex Systems*
*GENERAL CHAIRS*
Jean Loup Guillaume La Rochelle University, France
Bruno Pinaud University of Bordeaux, France
*PROGRAM CHAIRS*
Hocine Cherifi University of Burgundy, France
Guy Melançon University of Bordeaux, France
Join us at COMPLEX NETWORKS 2024 <https://www.complexnetworks.org/>
*-------------------------*
Hocine CHERIFI
University of Burgundy Franche-Comté
Laboratoire* I*nterdisciplinaire *C*arnot de *B*ourgogne - ICB UMR 6303 CNRS
Editor in Chief Plos Complex Systems
<https://plos.org/complex-systems-research-journal/#:~:text=PLOS%20Complex%2….>
Founding & Adisory Editor Applied Network Science
<https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/>
Editorial Board member PLOS One <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/>, IEEE
ACCESS <https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/?http%3A%2F%2Fieeeaccess_ieee_org%2F>,
Scientific
Reports <https://www.nature.com/srep/>,
Journal of Imaging <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jimaging>, Quality and
Quantity <https://www.springer.com/journal/11135/>, Computational Social
Networks <https://computationalsocialnetworks.springeropen.com/>,
Complex Systems <https://www.complex-systems.com/>
Oct. 14, 2024
Faculty position in Theoretical/Computational Neuroscience
by Goodhill, Geoffrey
The Department of Neuroscience at Washington University School of Medicine is seeking a tenure-track investigator at the level of Assistant Professor to develop an innovative research program in Theoretical/Computational Neuroscience.
Applicants should have a demonstrated commitment to neuroscience and a strong background in mathematics, physics, engineering, computer science, or a related field and hold a PhD. Areas of interest include (but are not limited to) research on fundamental molecular/cellular/circuit/systems mechanisms of brain architecture/development/function, machine learning methods for neuroscientific data, neuro-AI, and computational cognition/behavior/psychiatry. We seek talented, creative, and ambitious candidates from the entire span of computational neuroscience, and we are especially interested in candidates interested in building collaborations with experimental groups.
The successful candidate will join a thriving theoretical/computational neuroscience community at Washington University, including the new Center for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience. In addition, the Department also has world-class research strengths in systems, circuits and behavior, cellular and molecular neuroscience using a variety of animal models including worms, flies, zebrafish, rodents and non-human primates. The Department’s focus on fundamental neuroscience, outstanding research support facilities, and the depth, breadth and collegiality of our culture provide an exceptional environment to launch your independent research program.
To apply, submit an application packet including a cover letter describing your interest in our Department, curriculum vitae, a research statement (of no more than 3 pages) to the Faculty Opportunities Portal and arrange for three confidential letters of recommendation to be sent to neurosearch(a)wustl.edu c/o Professor Timothy E. Holy, Vice Chair for Research, Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110. The review of applications will begin on November 4, 2024.
Washington University is an Equal Opportunity Employer, and broadening opportunity is core mission of the institution. Our department highly values all our researchers, staff and trainees, and we provide an inclusive environment for people from diverse backgrounds and experiences. For more information about the Department, Washington University, and life in St. Louis, visit: https://neuroscience.wustl.edu/assistant-professor-theoretical-computationa…
Professor Geoffrey J Goodhill
Departments of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience
Director, Center for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience (ctcn.wustl.edu)
Affiliate appointments: Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Science and Engineering, and Electrical and Systems Engineering
Washington University School of Medicine
4370 Duncan Ave.
St Louis, MO 63110
g.goodhill(a)wustl.edu
https://neuroscience.wustl.edu/people/geoffrey-goodhill-phd
Oct. 12, 2024
Cluster Hiring of UT System Research Excellence Regents' Professorships at UTSA
by Dhireesha Kudithipudi
The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), MATRIX AI Consortium,
invites applications for the position of Full Professor / Associate
Professor, to be appointed as a University of Texas System (UT System)
Research Excellence Regents' Professor. Successful candidates will be part
of a strategic Clustered & Connected Hiring Program (CCP)
<https://www.utsa.edu/strategicplan/initiatives/research/strategic-hiring/cc…>
focused on Artificial Intelligence, with an anticipated start date in the
Fall of the 2025-26 academic year.
The University of Texas System recently approved the creation of the
Regents’ Research Excellence Program across its four Emerging Research
Universities (ERUs), including UTSA. UT System has allocated $55 million
across all four ERUs to fund the recruitment of research-active faculty to
dramatically grow its national research prominence and federal funding
opportunities.
The 5 positions open are in areas:
1. *Trustworthy AI/ML Algorithms (eg: neuro-inspired algorithms)*
2. *Neuromorphic AI Accelerators/Chips*
3. *Human-Centered AI*
4. *AI Ethics*
5. *Quantum Encryption for AI Confidentiality*
The Regents Professors will be core members of the MATRIX Consortium, which
is a central hub for 87 AI scientists, facilitating transdisciplinary
research, fostering high-impact collaborations, and offering thought
leadership and domain expertise to address the most challenging and complex
problems in AI. Areas of interest include Trustworthy AI/ML Algorithms,
Neuromorphic AI Accelerators, Human-centered AI, AI Ethics, all of which
advance the research thrusts in the MATRIX. MATRIX strives for scientific
excellence in developing holistic solutions for human well-being. The team
has a successful track record in securing large collaborative grants that
generated multiple centers, such as the NSF AI Partner Institute, two NSF
EFRI BRAIDs, AFOSR COE in neuro-inspired AI, along with large collaborative
projects in AI for healthcare.
Apply here:
https://zahr-prd-candidate-ada.utshare.utsystem.edu/psc/ZAHRPRDADA/EMPLOYEE…
Best Regards,
Dhireesha Kudithipudi
Founding Director| MATRIX
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fai.utsa.e…>
AI
Consortium & NUAI
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nuail…>
Research Lab
Professor| McDermott Endowed Chair| ECE/CS| UTSA
Oct. 11, 2024
Postdoc positions at U Oregon
by James Murray
Postdoc positions are available at the University of Oregon’s NeuroAI Center (ion.uoregon.edu/neuroai<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ion.uoregon.edu/neuroai__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54…>) in the Murray and Mazzucato labs. In our research, we seek to uncover the principles of how the brain performs computations related to sensory perception, decision making, and motor control. While previous experience in computational neuroscience and machine learning are desirable, applicants from other quantitative fields (e.g. math, physics, statistics, computer science) who are eager to learn about neuroscience are highly encouraged to apply as well.
Some of the scientific questions that motivate our work are
* How do different regions of the brain interact to learn new motor skills?
* What are the neural mechanisms underlying optimal performance in complex cognitive tasks?
* What are the principles that enable brains and artificial agents to learn efficiently from experience while minimizing forgetting?
* How can neural circuits generate the complex dynamics enabling naturalistic animal behavior?
Our labs aim at building mechanistic models of brain function grounded in a combination of theoretical approaches, neural network-based simulations, and statistical analysis of experimental data. The candidate will have the opportunity to collaborate with a large network of experimental collaborators at University of Oregon and at other institutions with expertise in sensory processing (visual, auditory, and olfactory), motor control, naturalistic behavior, neural engineering, and brain-computer interfaces.
The Oregon NeuroAI Center is part of the Institute of Neuroscience at the University of Oregon (ion.uoregon.edu<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://https.ion.uoregon.edu__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jj…>), a major hub for systems and theoretical neuroscience research. The successful candidate will also join our International Network for Bio-Inspired Computing (in-bic.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.in-bic.org__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jjW_DXqAj…>), a worldwide consortium of NeuroAI groups that provides trainees with an extended network for collaboration, including trainee exchanges, workshops, and schools. The University of Oregon is located in Eugene, Oregon, a vibrant college town in the Pacific Northwest with ample cultural offerings and phenomenal access to outdoor recreation.
We offer a competitive salary commensurate with the candidate’s experience, and remote work arrangements may be considered. Our Institute strongly advocates for inclusivity in science, and we encourage applications from underrepresented groups.
Required Qualifications
Successful candidates will have a PhD in a quantitative field, including physics, neuroscience, mathematics, statistics, computer science, or related fields. Applicants should have a strong quantitative background including at least some coding experience.
Application
The application can be found here: https://academicjobsonline.org/ajo/jobs/28843. Application reviews will start on December 1st and will continue until the position is filled. Inquiries can be sent to James Murray (jmurray9 at uoregon dot edu) or Luca Mazzucato (lmazzuca at uoregon dot edu).
--
James M Murray
Assistant Professor
Depts. of Biology and Mathematics and
Institute of Neuroscience
University of Oregon
murraylab.uoregon.edu<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://murraylab.uoregon.edu__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!j…>
Oct. 11, 2024