- Comp-neuro - lists.cnsorg.org

EMBO Course “Quantifying Astrocyte Physiology by Models from Genome to Circuits,” April 10–11, 2025, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

by De Pitta, Maurizio

Dear colleagues, Please share and disseminate through your network. On behalf of all the organizers, I am happy to announce that registrations are now open for the EMBO Course on “Quantifying Astrocyte Physiology by Models from Genome to Circuits” hosted by the University of Padua, in Padua, Italy, on April 10–11, 2025 https://sites.google.com/view/embo-satellite-meeting/home The course is a Satellite Event of the EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems,” which will follow in nearby Venice a couple of days later (April 14–18, 2025). The EMBO Course “Quantifying Astrocyte Physiology by Models from Genome to Circuits” is a two-day intensive course aimed at teaching essential modeling approaches to harness astrocyte biology revolving around four main themes such as (i) astrocyte genomics, (ii) intracellular calcium signaling, (iii) tripartite synapses, (iv) neuron-astrocyte networks. The course is open to researchers of any level in the Academia and Industry. Registration Policy Attendance to the Course is limited to 50 participants due to limited seating. Registrants that are also planning to attend the EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems” should register through this latter’s website: https://meetings.embo.org/event/25-astrocytes People who will not be selected to attend the EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems” can still opt to participate in the course by registering through the course website: https://sites.google.com/view/embo-satellite-meeting/home Thank you for your consideration. Maurizio De Pitta ----- Maurizio DE PITTA Principal Investigator Neuron-Glia Interactions Lab (NGILab) Krembil Research Institute, 4KD-509 60 Leonard Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 0S8, CA +1.416.603.5800 ext. 3290 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization. If you feel you have received an email from UHN of a commercial nature and would like to be removed from the sender's mailing list please do one of the following: (1) Follow any unsubscribe process the sender has included in their email (2) Where no unsubscribe process has been included, reply to the sender and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you require additional information please go to our UHN Newsletters and Mailing Lists page. Please note that we are unable to automatically unsubscribe individuals from all UHN mailing lists. Patient Consent for Email: UHN patients may provide their consent to communicate with UHN about their care using email. All electronic communication carries some risk. Please visit the UHN website and search “Using email to Communicate with Your UHN Health Care Team” to learn about the risks of electronic communication and how to protect your privacy. You may withdraw your consent to receive emails from UHN at any time. Please contact your care provider, if you do not wish to receive emails from UHN.

Nov. 4, 2024

EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems,” April 14–18, 2025, Venice International University, Venice, Italy

by De Pitta, Maurizio

Dear colleagues, Please share and disseminate through your network. On behalf of all the organizers, I am happy to announce that registrations are now open for the EMBO Workshop on “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems,” which will take place at the exclusive setting of the Venice International University on San Servolo Island in Venice (Italy) on April 14–18, 2025. https://meetings.embo.org/event/25-astrocytes The EMBO Workshop Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems is the first international meeting dedicated to astrocytes. It showcases an exceptional line-up of renowned investigators in the field of astrocyte biology to provide a multidisciplinary, comprehensive view of astrocyte research aimed at spurring research in the field for the next decade. Participation in the conference is limited to 160 attendees. The primary selection criterion is the quality of the scientific work. A scientific committee, composed of the Organizers and workshop speakers, will evaluate submitted abstracts based on their relevance to the astrocyte field and alignment with the workshop topics. The presentation of unpublished data is encouraged and will be given priority. We strongly encourage participation from PhD students and postdocs. Selected abstracts will be chosen for short talks, flash talks, and/or poster sessions. Registration: To enroll in selections and access the meeting, please pre-register through the website at the end of this message by January 14, 2025. Confirmed Speakers (in alphabetical order): Amit Agarwal, Heidelberg University, Germany Nicola Allen, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, USA Amaia Arranz, Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Spain Blanca Díaz Castro, University of Edinburgh, UK Won-Suk Chung, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea Laura Civiero, University of Padua, Italy Carmen Falcone, International School for Advanced Studies, Italy Tommaso Felin, Italian Institute of Technology, Italy Fiona Doetsch, University of Basel, Switzerland Bart de Strooper, University College London, UK Maurizio De Pittà, Krembil Research Institute, Canada Blanca Díaz Castro, University of Edinburgh, UK Carole Escartin, CNRS University of Paris-Saclay, France Cristina García Cáceres, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Germany Angela Giangrande, University of Strasbourg, France Inbal Goshen, The Hebrew University, Israel Naomi Habib, The Hebrew University, Israel Dieter Heiland, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Germany Elly Hol, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, The Netherlands Matthew Holt, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, Portugal Dolores Irala, Duke University Medical Center, USA Stephan Kaeser, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Germany Baljit Khakh, University of California Los Angeles, USA Ksenia Kastanenka, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA Martin Kampmann, University of California, USA Andràs Lakatos, University of Cambridge, UK Pierre Magistretti, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia Keith Murai, McGill University Health Center, Canada Marta Navarrete, Instituto Cajal CSIC, Spain Valentin Nägerl, University of Bordeaux, France Nathalie Rouach, College de France, France Francisco Quintana, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA Aiman Saab, University of Zurich, Switzerland Eduardo Zimmer, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil EMBO Workshop “Astrocytes: From Molecules to Systems” Apr 14–18, 2025 Venice (Italy) https://meetings.embo.org/event/25-astrocytes Thank you for your consideration of the matter. Maurizio De Pitta ----- Maurizio DE PITTA Principal Investigator Neuron-Glia Interactions Lab (NGILab) Krembil Research Institute, 4KD-509 60 Leonard Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 0S8, CA +1.416.603.5800 ext. 3290 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization. If you feel you have received an email from UHN of a commercial nature and would like to be removed from the sender's mailing list please do one of the following: (1) Follow any unsubscribe process the sender has included in their email (2) Where no unsubscribe process has been included, reply to the sender and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you require additional information please go to our UHN Newsletters and Mailing Lists page. Please note that we are unable to automatically unsubscribe individuals from all UHN mailing lists. Patient Consent for Email: UHN patients may provide their consent to communicate with UHN about their care using email. All electronic communication carries some risk. Please visit the UHN website and search “Using email to Communicate with Your UHN Health Care Team” to learn about the risks of electronic communication and how to protect your privacy. You may withdraw your consent to receive emails from UHN at any time. Please contact your care provider, if you do not wish to receive emails from UHN.

Nov. 4, 2024

[seminar.wwtns] World wide VVTNS series: Wednesday, Wednesday 6, 2024, at 11:00 am EST

by David Hansel

[image: VVTNS.png] https://www.wwtns.online <https://streaklinks.com/A9c7PbbpKY7PxB6PaAJWGD3-/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wwtns.on…> - on twitter: wwtns@TheoreticalWide You are cordially invited to the lecture given by Hannah Choi Georgia Tech on the topic of Unraveling information processing through functional networks The lecture will be held on zoom on Wednesday, November 6, 2024, at *11:00 am EST * To receive the zoom link: https://www.wwtns.online/register-page *Abstract: *While anatomical connectivity changes slowly through synaptic learning, the functional connectivity of neurons changes rapidly with ongoing activity of neurons and their functional interactions. Functional networks of neurons and neural populations reflect how their interactions change with behaviors, stimulus types, and internal states. Therefore, the information propagation across a network can be analyzed through the varying topological properties of the functional networks. Our study investigates the functional networks of the visual cortex at both the single-cell and population levels. Our analyses of functional connectivity of single neurons, constructed from spiking activity in neural populations of the visual cortex, reveal local and global network structures shaped by stimulus complexity. In addition, we propose a new method for inferring functional interactions between neural populations that preserves biologically constrained anatomical connectivity and signs. Applying our method to 2-photon data from the mouse visual cortex, we uncover functional interactions between cell types and cortical layers, suggesting distinct pathways for processing expected and unexpected visual information. *About VVTNS : Launched as the World Wide Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar (WWTNS) in November 2020 and renamed in homage to Carl van Vreeswijk in Memoriam (April 20, 2022), Speakers have the occasion to talk about theoretical aspects of their work which cannot be discussed in a setting where the majority of the audience consists of experimentalists. The seminars, **held on Wednesdays at 11 am ET,** are 45-50 min long followed by a discussion. The talks are recorded with authorization of the speaker and are available to everybody on our YouTube channel.* ᐧ ᐧ

Nov. 3, 2024

Faculty position of AI and psychology/neuroscience - University of Miami

by Mingbo Cai

*Faculty position of Ai and psychology / neuroscience* The Department of Psychology at the University of Miami invites applications for a full-time, tenure-eligible, or tenure-track faculty member to join our department in August 2025. The opening is part of a College of Arts & Sciences cluster hire dedicated to artificial intelligence (machine learning). Prospective candidates should use artificial intelligence as a core approach in their investigations and/or as a topic of their research. Individuals who also have interests in computational approaches including advanced quantitative techniques are encouraged to apply. The specific area of research is open. Area(s) of focus could include, but are not limited to, basic research on perception, cognition, affect, neurophysiology, language, behavior, mental health, the impact of disparities, learning, development, human computer interaction, deep neural network mechanisms, brain-inspired AI, or computational cognitive neuroscience. The candidate’s research would complement and expand current work in the department using large language models to study naturalistic speech, using machine learning to model emotional communication, and using computational models to explain both neural processing and behavior. Candidates will support and advance UM’s mission to engage in innovative and interdisciplinary AI research across the college and university. The Department of Psychology <https://www.psy.miami.edu/> is a vibrant, collaborative community that includes clinical and psychological sciences faculty across Adult <https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/adult-division/>, Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience <https://cbn.psy.miami.edu/>, Child <https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/child-division/>, and Health <https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/health-division/> Divisions. The mission of the Department is to acquire, advance, and disseminate knowledge within the Psychological and Biobehavioral Sciences, supported through excellent graduate programs <https://www.psy.miami.edu/graduate/doctoral-programs/index.html> and state-of-the-art facilities. The department values and celebrates cultural diversity of all kinds and has an active Diversity and Equity Committee <https://www.psy.miami.edu/about-the-department/dec/index.html>. The greater Miami community is one of the most ethnically and culturally diverse metropolitan areas in the country. Applications will be considered at all ranks. Appointment is expected to start on August 15, 2025. Candidates must hold a Ph.D. by the appointment start date. Applications can be submitted via the UM Careers Website <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fumiami.wd…>. Please compile the following documents in *up to five PDFs (each within 5MB) and upload them under the Resume/CV *section of the online application. If you have difficulties uploading any representative publications due to size limitations, please email them directly to our administrative assistant Maria Shah (maria.shah(a)miami.edu) · Letter of interest · Current CV · Research statement · Teaching statement · A statement that explains your contributions to diversity, equity, and inclusion, including comment on mentoring underrepresented populations · 3 representative publications · 3-4 references – we will request letters of recommendation for a final pool of applicants Review of applications will begin on December 1, 2024 and continue until the position is filled. Inquiries, requests for information, and nominations can be sent to the Search Co-Chairs, Aaron Heller ( aheller(a)miami.edu) and Daniel Messinger (dmessinger(a)miami.edu) *------------------------------* The University of Miami is an Equal Opportunity Employer – Females, Minorities, Protected Veterans, and/or Individuals with Disabilities are encouraged to apply. Applicants and employees are protected from discrimination based on certain categories protected by Federal law. Click here <https://www.hr.miami.edu/careers/eo-ada/index.html> for additional information. Mingbo Cai Assistant Professor Department of Psychology University of Miami

Nov. 2, 2024

Reminder Announcement of BrainCriticality 2024 3-day conference Nov 6 - 8, 2024, NIH, USA

by Plenz, Dietmar (NIH/NIMH) [E]

Please post the following reminder for our upcoming conference which was first announced on your listserv on Oct. 5 (see bottom of this email). +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Hybrid Brain Criticality Conference 2024 from Wed, Nov. 6th - Fri, Nov. 8th is just around the corner! This hybrid meeting will take place at the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA with ~25 speakers over the course of 3 days. Contributions will cover recent developments in the fields of systems neuroscience and collective phenomena in complex systems with focus on the role of criticality and its implications for normal and abnormal brain dynamics. You can now access the updated conference program, including selected Oral Spotlight presentations, on our website: https://braincriticality.org/<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbraincrit…>. Zoom Access Link (free): To join the conference virtually via Zoom, please use this link: https://nih.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_Nsl-6_QwRWeRI8dyp3emVg#/registr…<https://nih.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_Nsl-6_QwRWeRI8dyp3emVg> By entering your email, you'll gain direct access to the virtual meeting room when it opens. If you're unable to join immediately, you'll receive an email with a direct access link to use later. This same link will remain valid for the entire conference duration. We look forward to welcoming you soon! The Organizers Dietmar Plenz, Lucilla de Arcangelis, Miguel Angel Muñoz, Mauro Copelli, and Demian Battaglia +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thank you very much, Dietmar Plenz, PhD Principal Investigator Section on Critical Brain Dynamics National Institute of Mental Health USA _____________________________________________ From: Plenz, Dietmar (NIH/NIMH) [E] Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2024 1:20 PM To: comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org Subject: Announcement of BrainCriticality 2024 3-day conference Nov 6 - 8, 2024, NIH, USA Brain Criticality Hybrid Meeting November 6 - 8 2024 (in person/virtual) For registration and details see: https://braincriticality.org/<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbraincrit…> This hybrid meeting will take place at the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA with ~25 speakers over the course of 3 days. Contributions will cover recent developments in the fields of systems neuroscience and collective phenomena in complex systems with focus on the role of criticality and its implications for normal and abnormal brain dynamics. Dietmar Plenz, Ph.D. Senior Investigator Section on Critical Brain Dynamics National Institute of Mental Health USA "Complexity from simple rules"

Nov. 2, 2024

Openings for Postdocs, RAs, and PhD Students in Computational Psychiatry and Neuro-AI (Lin Lab)

by doerlbh＠gmail.com

Dear colleagues, The Lin Lab (Bytes of Minds Lab) at Mount Sinai is actively recruiting Postdoctoral Researchers, PhD Students, and Research Assistants passionate about Computational Psychiatry and Neuro-AI. Led by Dr. Baihan Lin and based within New York’s largest health network, our lab is at the forefront of mental health technology and brain-inspired AI research, combining insights from neuroscience, cognitive science, and machine learning to create adaptive, intelligent systems that can transform mental health care and deepen our understanding of the mind. Why Join Us? - Cutting-edge Research: Our work spans neuro-inspired AI, computational psychiatry, brain-computer interfaces, extended realities (XR), social media analysis, wearable technology, and more. - Interdisciplinary Environment: Engage with advanced neuroscience, machine learning, and cognitive science to create innovative tools for mental health and next-gen neurotechnology. - Unique Positioning: As part of Mount Sinai’s dynamic research community, we have access to extensive data resources and collaborations within a top-tier hospital network, biggest in NY, and ranked #1 in healthcare AI by Nature. We invite interested candidates with a drive to explore the frontiers of mind and machine to join us. For more details, visit linlab.org, or apply directly by emailing Dr. Baihan Lin at baihan.lin(a)mssm.edu. US (and especially NYC-based) candidates preferred, though international applicants are welcome to apply. Best, Baihan Lin, PhD Bytes of Minds Lab (Lin Lab) Departments of AI, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Friedman Brain Institute, Center for Computational Psychiatry Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA baihan.lin(a)mssm.edu | linlab.org

Nov. 1, 2024

Invitation to EiNS Seminars: Guillermo Cecchi (IBM Research, USA) - AI Challenges for Large Longitudinal Clinical Trials in Mental Health

by Jose A. Fernandez

Dear Comp-Neuro members, You're cordially invited to join us for the upcoming session of the “Explorations in Neuroscience Seminars” (EiNS). We are excited to feature *Guillermo Cecchi* from the *T.J. Watson Institute at IBM Research, USA*, who will be presenting on “*AI Challenges for Large Longitudinal Clinical Trials in Mental Health.*” The lecture will take place on YouTube Live on *Friday, November 15, 2024, at 3 PM (GMT-3)*. We look forward to your participation! Please note that this talk will be conducted in Spanish. Feel free to share this invitation with anyone who might be interested but isn't on our list. *Link:* https://www.youtube.com/ExactasUNCPBA/live Best wishes, *Jose A. Fernandez-Leon Fellenz*Adjunct Professor UNCPBA - Researcher CONICET CIFICEN (UNCPBA-CICPBA-CONICET) & INTIA (UNCPBA-CICPBA) Dept. of Computer Science and Systems - Exactas-UNCPBA *EMail:* jafernandez(a)intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar *Web:* https://jafphd.intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar/ *NeuroAI Lab:* https://neuro-ai-lab.intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar/ ---------------------- *Title: AI Challenges for Large Longitudinal Clinical Trials in Mental Health - * *Guillermo Cecchi (Institute T.J. Watson – IBM Research, USA)* *Abstract: *The recent experience of accelerated vaccine development under the pressure of the covid pandemic, the massive adoption of consumer electronics and the explosion of AI capabilities signal a dramatic shift in the implementation of clinical trials, which have been particularly ineffective and onerous in mental health. We will present results from ongoing and recently completed large longitudinal clinical trials for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Chronic Pain, Prodromal Psychosis and outcomes across all mental health conditions in which massive streams of clinical data are combined with at-home ultra-high frequency digital information including smart phone use, geolocation, and semi-structured and free-form language to provide a holistic and quasi-real time assessment of the participants, and will discuss the analytic and interpretation challenges that emerge in these demanding studies. *BIO:* https://research.ibm.com/people/guillermo-cecchi *Academic background:* Guillermo Cecchi received an education in Physics (MSc, University of La Plata, Argentina, 1991), Physics and Biology (PhD, The Rockefeller University, 1994-1999), and Imaging in Psychiatry (Postdoctoral Fellow, Cornell University 2000-2001). He has been interested in diverse aspects of theoretical biology, including Brownian transport, molecular computation, spike reliability in neurons, song production and representation in songbirds, statistics of natural images and visual perception, statistics of natural language, and brain imaging. In 2001 he joined IBM Research to work on computational approaches to brain function. In recent years, Dr. Cecchi has pioneered the use of a computational linguistics approach to quantify psychiatric conditions from short speech samples, applying it successfully to conditions as diverse as schizophrenia, mania, prodromal psychosis, chronic pain, neurodegeneration, drug and alcohol intake, and psychotherapy. *Areas of research: *Dr. Cecchi directs the Computational Psychiatry and the Neuroimaging groups in IBM Research, and is Associate Director of Analytics for NIH's Advancing Medicines Partnerships - Schizophrenia. From May 2024, Dr. Cecchi is the co-Director of the PREDiCT Center for outcomes forecast across all mental health outpatients in New York City Mt Sinai hospitals (NIH U01 center grant). *About EiNS Seminars*: This online seminar series aims to go beyond the human mind to unlock intelligence across nature and machines. The talks invite a cross-disciplinary exploration of cognitive and decision-making systems, and computational linguistics from biological organisms to Artificial Intelligence. By examining the intricacies of minds embedded in physical bodies or their absence, we aim to uncover novel approaches for developing neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Join us as we delve into the fascinating world of embodied and cognitive intelligence, exploring how memory, learning, decision-making, environmental awareness, and consciousness manifest across various life forms and AI challenges. Each talk will feature captivating case studies and open dialogue, fostering a collaborative environment for generating fresh perspectives. The talks are recorded only with authorization of the speaker and are available to everybody at https://neuro-ai-lab.intia.exa.unicen.edu.ar/eins-seminars.

Oct. 30, 2024

Complex Networks 2024 – Program & Registration now Available!

by Hocine Cherifi

We’re thrilled to invite you to Complex Networks 2024! The program is now live, featuring an exceptional lineup of keynote speakers, tutorials, presentations, and sessions that showcase the latest developments in complex networks. *Explore the Program:* Our diverse schedule includes thought-provoking keynotes, hands-on tutorials, oral presentations, and interactive poster and lightning sessions. You can view the full program here: [Link to All Files <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gEuIWHM5NXkd75Q3fun5zuTyp-lbFu_o?us…> ]. *Key Highlights:* - *Tutorials <https://complexnetworks.org/tutorials/> on December 09:* Join specialized tutorials designed to deepen your knowledge and provide practical skills. - *Keynote Speakers <https://complexnetworks.org/keynotes/>:* Gain insights from renowned experts who will share cutting-edge perspectives on complex network research and applications. - *Program at a Glance <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1paPlcRaZmntRoToxc5Rbq8YampNlNLP2/view>* - *Poster Sessions <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fWZkkYijpASQwZHJfCc5RtnikUwmFCCF/view>* - *Oral Sessions <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MwPeu5RdoCPPbdp_8zmslmOfwK735ewZ/view>* - *Lightning Sessions <https://drive.google.com/file/d/12iZxpGrjcJwMCN4K6gDqkGagWFIEyjkG/view>* *Register Now:* Don’t miss the opportunity to engage with leading researchers and practitioners in the field. If you haven’t registered yet, secure your spot here: [https://complexnetworks.org/registration/] <https://complexnetworks.org/registration/> *Conference Dates and Location:* Conference will be held from December 10, 2024 to December 12, 2024 in vibrant Istanbul. In addition to the sessions, enjoy networking opportunities, including a welcome reception and a gala dinner, to foster collaboration and connection. We look forward to seeing you in Istanbul for an enriching and inspiring event! Best regards, Complex Networks 2024 Organizing Committee Join us at COMPLEX NETWORKS 2024 <https://www.complexnetworks.org/> *-------------------------* Hocine CHERIFI University of Burgundy Franche-Comté Laboratoire* I*nterdisciplinaire *C*arnot de *B*ourgogne - ICB UMR 6303 CNRS Editor in Chief Plos Complex Systems <https://plos.org/complex-systems-research-journal/#:~:text=PLOS%20Complex%2….> Founding & Adisory Editor Applied Network Science <https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/> Editorial Board member PLOS One <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/>, IEEE ACCESS <https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/?http%3A%2F%2Fieeeaccess_ieee_org%2F>, Scientific Reports <https://www.nature.com/srep/>, Journal of Imaging <https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jimaging>, Quality and Quantity <https://www.springer.com/journal/11135/>, Computational Social Networks <https://computationalsocialnetworks.springeropen.com/>, Complex Systems <https://www.complex-systems.com/>

Oct. 30, 2024

Two PhD positions

by Phil Garner

Dear Colleagues, The Idiap Research Institute in partnership with the Department of Mathematics at Mahidol University seek two PhD students to work on Bayesian Optimisation and training techniques for spiking neural networks. Funded by the Swiss NSF, one student will be based in Martigny in the Swiss alps, the other in Bangkok in Thailand. Exchanges between the two are planned. In addition to promising better understanding of biological processes, spiking nets have persuasive low-power implications. However, they present difficulties associated with their many hyperparameters, binary nature and non-differentiability of the emitted spikes. At Idiap, the project will build on our recent work that has shown that spiking networks are plausible solutions for speech processing tasks. The Bayesian approach will be twofold: In a first thread we will attempt to show that prior information can compensate for discontinuities in the error landscape arising from the binary nature. In a second thread, we will use Bayesian Optimisation techniques to handle the increased number of hyperparameters associated with spiking neurons. At Mahidol, the team will be responsible for designing frameworks for LPNet and neural networks to address the vehicle routing problem (VRP). The project will explore the effectiveness of these approaches in solving VRP and identify their limitations. The ultimate aim is to enhance VRP solutions through our spiking neural network (SNN) framework. The ideal student should have a master's (or equivalent) degree in engineering, computer science, physics, or mathematics. They should have a good background in mathematics, statistics, and programming (C/C++, Python, scripting languages). Candidates should have a deep understanding of ANNs and, ideally, familiarity with SNNs. For more information and to apply, for Idiap: https://careers.werecruit.io/en/idiap/offers/phd---bayesian-methods-for-spi… for Mahidol: https://mathematics.sc.mahidol.ac.th/scholarship-for-phd-in-mathematics-swi… The SNSF SPIRIT program is especially concerned with gender and identity inclusivity; we will emphasize this through the hiring process. In this sense, we particularly encourage applications from female candidates. Sincerely, -- Phil Garner http://www.idiap.ch/~pgarner

Oct. 30, 2024

PhD opportunity: computational neuroscience of decision-making and addiction

by mailinglists.4svr4＠simplelogin.com

I am seeking candidates for a potential PhD project at the University of Surrey, investigating how dopamine shapes memory formation and decision-making in healthy and addictive behaviours. Essential Requirements * Strong academic background * Programming skills (or strong willingness to learn) * Advanced statistical knowledge (or strong willingness to learn) * Interest in computational neuroscience and addiction research Funding Information Through the South East Doctoral Training Arc (SEDarc), funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), successful candidates can receive: * Full funding for UK or International students * Living stipend at UKRI rates * Access to advanced research training Previous students from our School have successfully secured these competitive studentships. However, funding is not guaranteed and depends on both the candidate's academic excellence and the strength of the research proposal. If you are interested, please send your CV to c.feherdasilva(a)surrey.ac.uk . I will be happy to discuss the project idea and guide you through the application process. Best regards, Carolina Feher da Silva Lecturer in Psychology University of Surrey Note: This opportunity is open to both UK and International students. The University of Surrey is located in Guildford, 40 minutes from central London.

Oct. 29, 2024

Queers in STEM social London

by Niedernhuber,Maria

Dear all Representatives of LGBT university staff networks in London, as well as the organisation Pride in STEM, are organising a social for queer academics, focusing on STEM. Anyone is welcome. Since our social originated at a cognitive and computational neuroscience conference, queer neuroscientists are very well represented, and we hope that this will be a great opportunity to network for queer people in cognitive and computational neuroscience. This is the sign-up link: <https://www.outsavvy.com/event/23202/queers-in-stem-pub-social> https://www.outsavvy.com/event/23202/queers-in-stem-pub-social. If anyone here is interested in co-organising, please shoot me an email, and feel free to forward the sign-up link to anyone you know who might be interested. We are especially still looking for a contact person at the University of Greenwich and at Royal Holloway University of London, which are not represented in the organising team at the moment, to advertise the social in their local LGBT staff network. Feel free to email me to chat about the initiative, and how to get involved! Have a lovely week! Maria (they/them) --- Maria Niedernhuber Postdoctoral researcher in Cognitive Neuroscience Consciousness and Cognition Lab, University of Cambridge Sleep and Cognition Lab, QMUL

Oct. 29, 2024

[Newsletter] rTAIM Seminar #13 | Ethical Agent or Mere Tool?: A Cautioning Argument for “Moral” Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare | 30 October 2024, 15h00, Online

by steven gouveia

rTAIM (Rebuilding Trust in AI Medicine) Monthly Seminars Seminar #13 Ethical Agent or Mere Tool?: A Cautioning Argument for “Moral” Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Jordan Joseph Wadden (Unity Health Toronto - Canada) Following the 12th rTAIM Online Seminar (by Francesco Prinzi, University of Palermo), we are happy to announce the first seminar of this academic year 2024/2025, the 13th rTAIM Online Seminar, with the participation of Jordan Joseph Wadden (Unity Health Toronto, Canada), on the 30th October 2024, 15h00-16h30 Lisbon Time Zone, via Zoom. ONLINE | Link Zoom<https://videoconf-colibri.zoom.us/j/95294324802?pwd=Lt2o4boR0iHYWFtXvu6KdrD…> ID: 952 9432 4802 | Password: 506705 #Seminar 13: To talk of moral machines presupposes that researchers understand enough about how humans come to their own conceptions of the good. Moral epistemology and moral psychology have struggled to describe these facts and processes, and we still don’t have a generalizable conception. However, there appears to be an assumption that ethics can nonetheless be instilled directly into artificial intelligence. This is of special concern in healthcare because algorithms and systems are being designed to recommend treatments and pathways for patients. But finding the right treatment for a patient requires more than just an analysis of the medical facts. Healthcare teams must also weigh preferences, goals, psycho-social needs, religious and spiritual beliefs, quality of life, and so on. Each of these elements has a unique, and often individualized, moral element. This paper presents an argument that healthcare artificial intelligence ought to be viewed as a mere tool, rather than as a (quasi-)moral agent which could act alone in the clinical encounter. I argue that some researchers have become distracted by the AI and robot rights discussions, making them think it’s possible to code ethics into a system when humans still don’t understand how we come to believe our own moral beliefs. Short Bio: Jordan Joseph Wadden, MA, PhD, HEC-C, is a clinical ethicist at Unity Health Toronto in Canada. He is an assistant professor (status only) in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto. His research focuses on the ethical implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning in healthcare. He was the winner of the 2024 Ethics of AI Award at the 3rd International Conference on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. rTAIM Seminars: https://ifilosofia.up.pt/activities/rtaim-seminars https://trustaimedicine.weebly.com/rtaim-seminars.html Organisation: Steven S. Gouveia (MLAG/IF) Mind, Language and Action Group (MLAG) Instituto de Filosofia da Universidade do Porto – UIDB/00502/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) ____________________________________________ Instituto de Filosofia (UI&D 502) Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto Via Panorâmica s/n 4150-564 Porto Tel. 22 607 71 80 E-mail: ifilosofia(a)letras.up.pt<mailto:ifilosofia@letras.up.pt> http://ifilosofia.up.pt/

Oct. 28, 2024

NIH-funded Post-doctoral fellowship - spatial navigation, gait, mobility, EEG, MRI, virtual reality - in biomedical engineering at the University of Florida

by Steve Weisberg

A postdoctoral researcher position studying electrocortical activity during human navigation is available in the laboratory of Dr. Daniel Ferris ( https://faculty.eng.ufl.edu/human-neuromechanics-laboratory) This position is for an initial one-year appointment, and has the potential to be renewed for three additional years based on performance and funding availability. https://explore.jobs.ufl.edu/cw/en-us/job/533572/postdoc Join a team studying age- and ADRD-related changes in gait and navigation, including Rachael Seidler, Dan Ferris, and Steve Weisberg. -- --------------------------------------------- *Steven M. Weisberg, PhD * Pronouns: he/him/his Assistant Professor of Psychology University of Florida Director: SCANN Lab <http://scannlab.psych.ufl.edu>

Oct. 28, 2024

[comp-neuro] job advertisement | 1 fully funded PhD position (E13) | Application deadline: Nov.18, 2024

by Daniel Schmid

Vacancy for dissertation/PhD project *Learning Search and Decision Mechanisms in Medical Diagnosis* We are looking for a new PhD student for a fully funded interdisciplinary research project investigating the computational mechanisms underlying the perceptual processes in medical imaging. *Brief project description and goals* Medical experts routinely screen images for signs of abnormality indicative of a disease. Experimental evidence shows that these experts, based on their training, are able to make a diagnose above chance level even after screening images for only a few seconds. Such visual inspection utilizes global ensemble scene statistics, or “scene gist”, to provide contextual guidance information. The goal of the PhD project is to investigate how such global, contextual gist information can be computed and incorporated in machine vision approaches, such as deep neural networks for natural or medical image processing. In particular, a goal is to develop neural mechanisms that can be integrated into existing pre-trained CNNs to compute scene gist for rapid global decision-making and contextual guidance in medical images. Such mechanisms should explain how such global feature compositions are learned to increase the classification specificity and, at the same time, do not equip an observer with the ability to precisely localize such feature compositions indicative of the evidence. At the implementation level, computational units (neurons) in hierarchical CNN architectures will be extended by integrating local bottom-up feature extraction mechanisms with top-down modulatory contextual fields. We focus on these mechanisms to learn the integration of information streams in counter-stream networks by employing novel two-point information integration units inspired by recent findings from neuroscience. These investigations will contribute to develop novel CNN architectures by integrating feedforward and feedback data streams that operate at different spatio-temporal scales and feature types inspired by computational mechanisms in biological vision. The combined global and local information is expected to provide more detailed explanations on a mechanistic level how radiologists steer their attention and search capacities and learn to improve such skills. *Requirements* - MSc degree in Computer Science, Engineering, Physics, Mathematics, Cognitive Systems/Science or equivalent relevant background - Experience in computational vision, neural networks, machine learning; with strong mathematical/physics foundation - Experience in developing biologically inspired models – or interested in learning how to develop such mechanisms and models - Experience in analysis of large data and evaluation of results - Strong coding skills - Personal skills: working in a team, but should be able to work independently, is strongly focused and enthusiastic about the project theme, is self-motivated and takes responsibility for reaching milestones - Experience and talent in scientific writing (with proficient written & oral English) *Contact & application* The project is part of the newly founded research training group “KEMAI” that focuses on integrating knowledge and learning based approaches for better medical AI (https://kemai.uni-ulm.de/ for more information). The offered PhD position is fully funded (E13 salary) and also benefits from an interdisciplinary setting, the ability to connect with peers from related projects and a clearly structured PhD program. Application materials are expected until November 18, 2024. They should contain a CV, statement of research interest and background in relation to the KEMAI training group and project theme C2. A cover letter should inform about the expected date of availability and name of two referees. Submit your application via the KEMAI website (preferred) or to Prof. Heiko Neumann (heiko.neumann(a)uni-ulm.de) or reach out for more information. Best regards, Daniel Schmid -- Daniel Schmid, M.Sc. Institute of Neural Information Processing Faculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology Ulm University James-Frank-Ring D-89081 Ulm Germany e-mail: daniel-1.schmid(a)uni-ulm.de

Oct. 28, 2024

Justin Wood speaking on November 12 in Developing Minds global online lecture series

by Jochen Triesch

Dear colleagues, On November 12, the Developing Minds global online lecture series is proud to host Justin Wood from Indiana University Bloomington, USA, speaking on: "Radical empiricism: The origins of knowledge as a mini-evolution“ Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9:00 am EST (Eastern Standard Time, US) 14:00 UTC (Universal Coordinated Time) 15:00 CET (Central European Time) 23:00 JST (Japan Standard Time) The zoom link/credentials are: https://uni-frankfurt.zoom-x.de/j/62980753356?pwd=0J6BtOaAy20YyanXX1gpkB3Ta… Meeting-ID: 629 8075 3356 Kenncode: 904159 Abstract: What are the origins of knowledge? A common theoretical strategy is to isolate core primitives of the mind, such as systems for reasoning about objects, space, number, agents, and language. The problem with this strategy is it disconnects brain development from general fitting principles that underlie chemistry, evolution, culture, and artificial intelligence. I argue that development can be understood as a “mini-evolution,” in which core mental skills are the products of generic evolution-like fitting processes. In evolution, life started from scratch, and species emerged as DNA adapted to the world via blind fitting. Likewise, in development, knowledge starts from scratch, and mental skills emerge as individual brains adapt to the world via blind fitting. Historically, the main roadblock for testing fitting theories has been the lack of benchmarks and models for measuring whether fitting models learn like brains. To directly compare learning across brains and models, both must be trained with the same data and tested on the same tasks. We propose a solution—called “Newborn Embodied Turing Tests” (NETTs)—in which newborn animals and fitting models are reared in the same environments and tested with the same tasks. I’ll describe a series of NETTs showing that generic fitting models (transformers) develop many core mental skills, including orientation selectivity, visual binding, shape-based vision, invariant object recognition, imprinting, collective behavior, and social preferences. These skills develop spontaneously when generic fitting models fit to prenatal and postnatal experiences. There is no need to postulate mysterious core primitives to explain the rapid development of domain-specific knowledge. Rather, core knowledge can be the product of generic fitting machinery: a radical empiricist view of the origins of knowledge. This mini-evolution view unifies chemistry, evolution, development, culture, and artificial intelligence under a common fitting framework, with shared general principles. Short Bio: Justin Wood is an Associate Professor of Informatics at Indiana University Bloomington. He is affiliated with programs in Animal Behavior, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Psychological & Brain Sciences. He received his B.A. from University of Virginia and M.S. & Ph.D. from Harvard University. Dr. Wood has studied the psychological abilities of a range of populations, including human adults, children, infants, chimpanzees, wild monkeys, starlings, and newborn chicks. He works at the intersection of developmental psychology, neuroscience, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to characterize the origins and computational foundations of intelligence. The talk will be recorded and made available for later viewing. For more information on the talk series and recordings of previous events, please visit: https://sites.google.com/view/developing-minds-series/home Best regards, Jochen Triesch -- Prof. Dr. Jochen Triesch Johanna Quandt Chair for Theoretical Life Sciences Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Goethe University Frankfurt http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~triesch/ Tel: +49 (0)69 798-47531 Fax: +49 (0)69 798-47611

Oct. 28, 2024

Re: Join Us for the Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop – Institute of Physics, London

by Rajpal, Hardik

Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce that registrations are now open for the Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop, taking place on the 25th and 26th of November 2024 at the Institute of Physics, King’s Cross, London. You can register for the event here: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/register We would also like to remind everyone that the abstract submission deadline for the poster session is fast approaching on 31st October 2024. PhD students and early career researchers are particularly encouraged to submit abstracts for this exciting opportunity to share your work. Please submit your abstracts at the following link: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/abstract-submission For further details about the workshop, you can explore the program here: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/programme Additionally, we are thrilled to announce a public event featuring a fireside chat between Prof. John Krakauer and Prof. Karl Friston on the intriguing topic, "Can Reductionism Explain the Mind?" This discussion will take place on the evening of 25th November, followed by a drinks reception. We look forward to welcoming you to an interdisciplinary gathering that will bring together experts from neuroscience and physics to explore cognition in innovative ways. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out, and we hope to see you there! Sincerely, Hardik Rajpal Research Associate Organizing Committee, Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop Imperial College London From: Rajpal, Hardik via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org> Date: Monday, 7 October 2024 at 12:39 To: comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org> Subject: [Comp-neuro] Join Us for the Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop – Institute of Physics, London This email from comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list<https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx> to disable email stamping for this address. Dear Colleagues, We are excited to announce that the Statistical Physics of Cognition workshop will take place on the 25th and 26th of November 2024 at the Institute of Physics, King's Cross, London. This workshop will explore the intersection of physics and neuroscience to better understand cognition, bringing together leading researchers from various disciplines, including statistical mechanics, network science, self-organized criticality, information theory, and more. The programme for the workshop is now live and can be viewed here: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/programme. While registrations open next week, we invite those interested in attending to fill out an expression of interest form in advance: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/registration We especially encourage PhD students and Early Career Researchers to participate by submitting abstracts for poster presentations. This is a great opportunity to present your research, receive feedback from leading experts, and engage in exciting discussions. * Abstract submission deadline: 31st October 2024 * Submit your abstract here: https://iop.eventsair.com/spc2024/abstract-submission We look forward to welcoming you to what promises to be a thought-provoking event at the frontier of cognitive science and physics. Please feel free to share this announcement with your colleagues, students, and networks. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out. Best regards, Hardik Rajpal Research Associate Organizing Committee, Statistical Physics of Cognition Workshop Imperial College London

Oct. 25, 2024

World wide VVTNS series: Fifth season opening lecture, Wednesday, October 30, 2024, at 11:00 am EDT

by David Hansel

*Important:* The seminar is at 11 am *EDT* Daylight saving time ends on Sunday, November 3, 2024 In Europe it ends on Sunday October 27, 2024 [image: VVTNS.png] https://www.wwtns.online <https://streaklinks.com/A9c7PbbpKY7PxB6PaAJWGD3-/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wwtns.on…> - on twitter: wwtns@TheoreticalWide You are cordially invited to the fifth season opening lecture of the online VVTNS series *Karel Svoboda* Allen Institute on the topic of *Illuminating synaptic learning* The lecture will be held on zoom on October 30, 2023, at *11:00 am EDT * To receive the zoom link: https://www.wwtns.online/register-page *Abstract: *How do synapses in the middle of the brain know how to adjust their weight to advance a behavioral goal (i.e. learning)? This is referred to as the synaptic ‘credit assignment problem’. A large variety of synaptic learning rules have been proposed, mainly in the context of artificial neural networks. The most powerful learning rules (e.g. back-propagation of error) are thought to be biologically implausible, whereas the widely studied biological learning rules (Hebbian) are insufficient for goal-directed learning. I will describe ongoing work focused on understanding synaptic learning rules in the cortex in a brain-computer interface task. ᐧ -- *Il n'y a ni obligation ni pression à traiter ou répondre à ce mail en dehors des heures de travail* "В каждой шутке есть доля шутки" 'Life is good ..' (Carl van Vreeswijk, 1962-2022) --------------------------------------- David Hansel Directeur de Recherche au CNRS Co-Group leader Cerebral Dynamics Plasticity and Learning lab., CNRS 45 rue des Saints Peres 75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tel (Cell): +33 607508403 - Fax (33).1.49.27.90.62 *CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE:* *This message and the documents that might be attached, are addressed exclusively to their(s) recipient(s) and may contain privileged or confidential information. The access to this information by people other than those designated is not authorized. If you are not the indicated recipient, you are notified that the use, disclosure and / or copying without authorization is prohibited under current legislation. If you have received this message in error, please kindly inform the sender immediately and proceed to its destruction.* ᐧ

Oct. 25, 2024

Software developer at Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology

by Erik De Schutter

The Computational Neuroscience unit (https://www.oist.jp/research/research-units/cnu) at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Japan has an opening for a postdoctoral researcher or technician to contribute to the software development of the nanoscale simulator of neuronal electrophysiology and molecular properties STEPS https://steps.sourceforge.net/STEPS/default.php. Initial duration is two years with an option to extend. The software developer will join the STEPS team and contribute to maintenance and further expansion of the software capacities. Recent versions of STEPS improved its parallel performance (http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2022.883742/full) and added modeling of vesicles (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-06276-5) The ideal candidate will have a scientific background but also possess good programming skills, but experienced software engineers can also apply. Competences: For the postdoctoral position a recent PhD is required in a relevant discipline such as neuroscience, molecular biology, biophysics, biochemistry, and for a technician a masters degree is required in a software/computer science related discipline. For either position, we require a talented programmer with experience in C++ and Python. In satisfying these criteria, it is expected that the candidate has some experience of modeling neuronal or other biological processes computationally, but this is not essential if the candidate has a strong enough interest in moving into the field. Fluent English conversation and writing skills are required. Benefits / Offer: A competitive salary and relocation package are offered. This an ideal position to gain experience in a prominent computational neuroscience lab. Contributions of technicians are honored by authorship on relevant publications. Please contact Prof. Erik De Schutter (erik(a)oist.jp) for inquiries.

Oct. 25, 2024

2024 Bonsai Developer Conference

by Joaquin Rapela

Hello, We are excited to invite you to the 2024 Bonsai Developer Conference, taking place from December 2nd to 4th, 2024, at the Sainsbury Wellcome Centre in London, UK. This event brings together neuroscience researchers, computational scientists, and software engineers with a shared interest in the Bonsai visual reactive programming language. The conference program and additional details can be found at https://conference.bonsai-rx.org/2024/ About Bonsai ------------ Bonsai https://bonsai-rx.org/ is an open-source reactive visual programming language widely use for neuroscience experimental control. Differently from standard programming languages where control flow is specified by composing sequences of instructions, and checking conditional loops for the occurrence of events, in reactive languages https://introtorx.com/ the control flow is specified by composing event streams. By placing asynchronous data streams front and centre, it becomes much easier to succinctly build complex programs manipulating hundreds of parallel data sources and controllers while retaining interoperability and modularity. Bonsai is a visual programming language where programs are laid out graphically. Each node represents a data stream, and edges represent input dependencies between streams. Parameters can be manipulated dynamically and every stream can be inspected at runtime. This graphical approach allows users with no programming experience to create complex asynchronous programs, and experienced Bonsai users to very quickly deploy and manage entire systems and applications. Bonsai is able to interface with a large number of experimental hardware for neuroscience experimental control, allowing researchers to easily build sophisticated experiments. We look forward to see you in London! Best regards, Goncalo Lopes g.lopes(a)neurogears.org Nicholas Guilbeault n.guilbeault(a)ucl.ac.uk Joaquin Rapela j.rapela(a)ucl.ac.uk

Oct. 22, 2024

Computational Psychology or Neuroscience Assistant Professor Position at the University of Arizona

by Cowen, Stephen Leigh - (scowen)

Hello everyone, The University of Arizona Psychology Department is hiring a tenure-track Assistant Professor in computational psychology, computational cognitive science, and/or computational neuroscience. A complete description of the position can be found below. We are looking for an individual with expertise and a publication history in domains such as modeling complex systems and behavior using approaches such as deep learning, machine learning, Bayesian methods, artificial neural networks, reinforcement learning, dynamic systems modelling, network analysis, and large language models. Preference will be given to applicants with the potential to collaborate across disciplines in Cognitive Science and Psychology. See the full posting and apply using the following link: https://arizona.csod.com/ux/ats/careersite/4/home/requisition/20668?c=arizo… The first batch of applications will be reviewed on Nov. 12. Applications will be accepted until the position is filled. Best, Stephen ------------------------------------------ Stephen Cowen, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Psychology Evelyn F. McKnight Brian Institute Interim Director: Cognition and Neural Systems Graduate interdisciplinary member: Neuroscience, Physiological Sciences, Applied Biosciences, and Cognitive Science The University of Arizona Life Sciences North, Rm 347 1501 N. Campbell Ave. Tucson, AZ 85724-5115 520-626-2615

Oct. 22, 2024

Postdoctoral Opportunity in My Research Group at University of Tennessee Knoxville

by Maroulas, Vasileios

Dear Colleagues, I wanted to bring to your attention a postdoctoral opening in my research group at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) and the Department of Mathematics at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. The position is at the intersection of topological deep learning and computational neuroscience and it is a collaboration with the US Army Research lab. Please feel free to share the following link with anyone who might be interested in the position: https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/list/25406 Thank you in advance for helping spread the word. Best regards, Vasileios Vasileios Maroulas, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor Director, AI Tennessee Initiative Professor of Mathematics The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Office of Research, Innovation, & Economic Development <https://research.utk.edu/oried/> Andy Holt Tower 1331 Circle Park Drive Knoxville, TN 37996-0100 Department of Mathematics<https://math.utk.edu/> Ayres Hall 1403 Circle Dr. Knoxville, TN 37996 email: vasileios.maroulas(a)utk.edu<mailto:vasileios.maroulas@utk.edu> office: 865-974-4302 LinkedIn: Vasileios Maroulas| LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/vasileios-maroulas-8721643/>

Oct. 22, 2024

Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton

by Julie Goulet

Oct. 22, 2024

Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton

by Sara A. Solla

Stephen, You have an explanation for everything. I was at the NIPS (now NeurIPS) meeting when you were giving a talk, but instead of talking about your work you spent the time allotted to you to complain about Hopfield stealing your ideas. I do not quite remember the year, but I am sure you do - late 1980s? So, yes, you have been complaining about this for as long as I know you. Word limits allow you to mention Hopfield’s 84 paper but not his 82 paper??!! It takes as many characters to write 82 as to write 84. The 82 paper was published at a time before ArXiv, preprints, and online postings, that is to say an actually printed copy became available, and that was in April 82. Your paper, the one where you did it all before, was submitted in August 82. You submitted your paper a few months after the 1982 paper by Hopfield appeared in print in PNAS. Anyone can verify this by looking at the printed versions of these two papers. What nobody can verify is that ‘someone told you that Hopfield knew about your paper’ before writing his. What cannot be verified is that there was a version of your paper that you tried to submit in 1980 to a journal that just happened to disappear. The article from 1971 that I referred to is the one you cited in your first tirade. The paper is about "Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural networks". According to Google Scholar, it has received 118 citations. And it is NOT because it appeared in a journal that has ceased to exist. It appeared in PNAS. I will assume that the 118 citations is an accurate measure of the interest that the paper has triggered in the 53 years since it was published. That you wrote a review in 1988 and that Michael Cohen wrote an article in 1992 does not give either of you precedence over Hopfield’s 1982 and 1984 papers. The Group on Statistical Physics and Nonlinear Dynamics of the American Physical Society organized a session to discuss the Nobel Prize given to Hopfield and Hinton. You can watch it on YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inMeFnIhuA8. My advice to you is to watch this discussion, read the 1982 and 1984 papers by Hopfield, then read your own papers, and try to see what it is that he figured out and that you missed. More than forty years later, it is time for you to look into these papers and acknowledge the crucial differences. If you still do not see it, I will be glad to try to explain it to you. Then you get to Hinton. Once I reminded you that the Prize citation is about the Boltzmann Machine and not about Back Propagation, you stopped criticizing Back Propagation to instead advertise work by James Williamson published in 1996 and 1997. These papers seem not to precede but to follow the 1985 publication of the Boltzmann Machine paper by 11 and 12 years. As for what was the atmosphere of intellectual intimidation in your group, you say that I would not know because I was not there. This is factually incorrect. I was there. I visited. I saw the group dynamics, and I was shocked. I was a young scientist, just a few years beyond my PhD, but I had never seen anything like it. One had to believe, not just agree with but believe in ART to work in your group. I ask you again: if ART provides a solution to every problem, as you advertised then and seem to continue to advertise today, how come there are still unsolved problems? The long note you have published in response to the Physics Nobel Prize is just pathetic. Sara On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 6:22 PM Grossberg, Stephen <steve(a)bu.edu> wrote: > Dear Sara, > > > > I reply below to your claims. > > > > *From: *Sara A. Solla <sasolla(a)gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, October 21, 2024 at 5:12 PM > *To: *Grossberg, Stephen <steve(a)bu.edu> > *Cc: *André Fabio Kohn via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org>, > Stephen Grossberg <steve(a)cns.bu.edu> > *Subject: *Re: [Comp-neuro] Re: Some scientific history that I > experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton > > You don't often get email from sasolla(a)gmail.com. Learn why this is > important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> > > Stephen, > > You have been complaining about not getting enough credit since I first > met you in the mid 1980s. > > > > That is not true. > > > > You refer to publishing before Hopfield's 1984 paper. You deliberately > ignore his 1982 paper, which received 27946 citations: > Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective > computational abilities, JJ Hopfield > PNAS, April 15, 1982, 79 (8) 2554-2558 > > > > My post was originally on a web site with strict word limits. That is why > I mentioned Hopfield’s 1984 article, but not his 1982 article. > > > > Section 6 of my 1988 review article: > > > > Grossberg, S. (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, > and architectures. *Neural Networks*, *1 *, 17-61. > > https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1988NN.pdf > > > > reviews Binary, Linear, and Continuous-Nonlinear classical neural network > models by many authors. > > > > This article has been cited 2410 times. > > > > Section 6 shows that the 1982 equation that Hopfield used is a variant of > the 1943 McCulloch-Pitts model. > > > > The Liapunov function for it is just a discrete version of the Liapunov > function for the Additive Model. > > > In contrast, the 1971 student paper you mentioned received 118 citations. > > > > I assume that you mean: > > > > Grossberg, S. (1971). Embedding fields: Underlying philosophy, > mathematics, and applications to psychology, physiology, and anatomy. *Journal > of Cybernetics*, 1, 28-50. > > https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971JoC.pdf > > > > This was a review article published in a journal that ceased to exist in > 1980 (see below) and thus could not be searched well by Google, which began > in 1998. > > > > The article discussed Generalized Additive Models (see its Section 6). > > > > I was able to get articles published proving global limit and oscillation > theorems for Generalized Additive Models in the* Proceedings of the > National Academy of Sciences* between 1967 and 1971; e.g., > > > > Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural > networks. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, 68, 828-831. > > https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971ProNatAcaSci.pdf > > > > See Equations 1, 2, 3, and 4 etc. > > > > Your 1983 paper with Michael Cohen in IEEE Transaction of Man, Systems, > and Cybernetics was received on August 1, 1982, several months after the > 1982 paper by Hopfeld had appeared in print. You did get a good number of > citations on this paper, 3344, but not as good as 27946. > > > > Michael Cohen and I tried to submit it to the *Journal of Cybernetics* in > 1980. > > > > But there was a glitch in the submission process due to the fact that the *Journal > of Cybernetics* unexpectedly stopped publishing that year and our article > got lost in the shuffle, unknown to us for a while. > > > > We resubmitted in 1982, which is why it was published in 1983. > > > > Our results pre-dated Hopfield 1982 and 1984 by two years. > > > > About the difference in citations: > > > > There is a difference between discovery and marketing. I was told that > Hopfield knew about my work before and with Michael Cohen before he went > around the country lecturing about work that we had previously published, > without citation. > > > > You mention a 1982 paper with Michael Cohen; I have not been able to find > it. > > > > I think that was a typo. Michael published the following article in 1992: > > > > Cohen, M. A. (1992). The construction of arbitrary stable dynamics in > nonlinear neural networks. > > *Neural Networks*, 5, 83 – 103. > > https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0893608005800085 > > > > Here is the Abstract: > > > > “In this paper, two methods for constructing systems of ordinary > differential equations realizing any fixed finite set of equilibria in any > fixed finite dimension are introduced; no spurious equilibria are possible > for either method. By using the first method, one can construct a system > with the fewest number of equilibria, given a fixed set of attractors. > Using a strict *Lyapunov function [boldface mine] *for each of these > differential equations, a large class of systems with the same set of > equilibria is constructed. A method of fitting these nonlinear systems to > trajectories is proposed. In addition, a general method which will produce > an arbitrary number of periodic orbits of shapes of arbitrary complexity is > also discussed. A more general second method is given to construct a > differential equation which converges to a fixed given finite set of > equilibria. This technique is much more general in that it allows this set > of equilibria to have any of a large class of indices which are consistent > with the Morse Inequalities. It is clear that this class is not universal, > because there is a large class of additional vector fields with convergent > dynamics which cannot be constructed by the above method. The easiest way > to see this is to enumerate the set of Morse indices which can be obtained > by the above method and compare this class with the class of Morse indices > of arbitrary differential equations with convergent dynamics. The former > set of indices are a proper subclass of the latter, therefore, the above > construction cannot be universal. In general, it is a difficult open > problem to construct a specific example of a differential equation with a > given fixed set of equilibria, permissible Morse indices, and permissible > connections between stable and unstable manifolds. A strict Lyapunov > function is given for this second case as well. This strict *Lyapunov > function [boldface mine] *as above enables construction of a large class > of examples consistent with these more complicated dynamics and indices. > The determination of all the basins of attraction in the general9 case for > these systems is also difficult and open.” > > > > I have never heard anybody referring to you as 'the father of AI'. > > > > As an acolyte of Hopfield, you wouldn’t. > > > > What I do remember is a visit to your group at BU many, many years ago - > in the late 80s or early 90s. I was amazed at finding out that you closely > supervised every word in every slide that anybody in your group was allowed > to show when invited to give a talk. Everybody was under a lot of pressure > to 'stay on message', where the 'message' was your view on things. I had > never encountered a scientific group run as a cult. It made an impression, > but not a positive one. So much for training over 100 people - by teaching > them not to think by themselves. > > > > You describe my devoted teaching as something ugly, even ad hominem. > > > > When I was a student, no one told me how to write an article or how to > prepare and give a talk or poster. I developed a method to enable my > students to grow intellectually and become independent scholars. > > > > When I started working with a new PhD student or postdoc, we discussed > what topics would potentially interest them. Then we read hundreds of > psychological and neurobiological articles together about that topic and > began to discuss the results in them. > > > > For students interested in engineering and AI, we studied all the methods > that were available to solve problems in a targeted problem domain. > > > > I encouraged my students to advance their own concepts about what might be > the underlying mechanisms that generated an article’s data or benchmarks. > Because we studied large amounts of data, favorite concepts often hit a > brick wall and had to be discarded. > > > > We developed a modeling method that I like to call the Method of Minimal > Anatomies. See Figure 2.37 in my 2021 Magnum Opus > > > > https://www.amazon.com/Conscious-Mind-Resonant-Brain-Makes/dp/0190070552 > > > > This Method is just Occam’s Razor applied to neural networks. > > > > As the Figure summarizes, it “Operationalizes the proper level of > abstraction” and “that you cannot ‘derive a brain’ in one step”. Our models > have been getting incrementally developed in a principled way to the > present time. > > > > Your statement that “the message was your [my] view on things” is the > opposite of how we worked. > > > > And how would you know? You were not there. > > > > The proof of the pudding is that all my students got positions that they > wanted after they earned their PhD’s with me. > > > > I was also told by multiple famous scientists that our department sent > them their best postdoctoral fellows. > > > > In fact, various major labs would contact me to let me know that they had > an open position and asked if one of my students was about to graduate. > > > > My students have gone on to successful careers after their postdocs and > other first post-PhD positions. > > > > Around half of them went into academe, and the other half into > engineering, technology, and AI. > > > > Groups of us have periodically gotten together for happy social events, > either at international conferences or in the Boston area. > > > > And they sent me information about their accomplishments and growing > families for many years. > > > > As for back-propagation, this is not what Hinton is cited for in the Nobel > Prize citation. It is for the Boltzmann machine. > > > > Yes, I know that, and I have also noted that my PhD student, James > Williamson, developed statistical neural network models that did not have > problems related to deep Learning. I have elsewhere noted that: > > > Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMS) also have analogs in the Adaptive > Resonance Theory (ART) family of models, but without the problems that > follow from using variants of Deep Learning. > > Here are two of them, both developed by my PhD student, James R. > Williamson: > > Gaussian ARTMAP: A Neural Network for Fast Incremental Learning of Noisy > Multidimensional Maps > https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0893608095001158 > > A Constructive, Incremental Learning Network for Mixture Modeling and > Classification > > http://techlab.bu.edu/files/resources/articles_tt/A%20constructive,%20incre… > > > > Finally, I always wondered: If ART solves all problems, why are there > ML/AI problems that remain to be solved? > > > > I would never claim that. I have always taught that science is never done. > See the Method of Minimal Anatomies. > > > > The fact that you can even think that about my work shows, sad to say, how > biased you have become. > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 7:49 AM Grossberg, Stephen via Comp-neuro < > comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org> wrote: > > Dear Comp-neuro colleagues, > > > > Here are some short summaries of the history of neural network > discoveries, as I experienced it, that are relevant to the recent Nobel > Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton: > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++THETHE THE NOBEL > PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON > FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HOPFIELD > > Here I summarize my concerns about the Hopfield award. > > I published articles in 1967 – 1972 in the Proceedings of the National > Academy of Sciences that introduced the Additive Model that Hopfield used > in 1984. My articles proved global theorems about the limits and > oscillations of my Generalized Additive Models. See sites.bu.edu/steveg for > these articles. > > For example: > > Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural > networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831. > https://lnkd.in/emzwx4Tw > > This article illustrates that my mathematical results were part of a > research program to develop biological neural networks that provide > principled mechanistic explanations of psychological and neurobiological > data. > > Later, Michael Cohen and I published a Liapunov function that included the > Additive Model and generalizations thereof in 1982 and 1983 before Hopfield > (1984) appeared. > > For example, > > Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern > formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE > Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826. > https://lnkd.in/eAFAdvbu > > I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before he published his 1984 > article, without citation. > > Recall that I started my neural networks research in 1957 as a Freshman at > Dartmouth College. > > That year, I introduced the biological neural network paradigm, as well as > the short-term memory (STM), medium-term memory (MTM), and long-term memory > (LTM) laws that are used to this day, including in the Additive Model, to > explain data about how brains make minds. > > See the review in https://lnkd.in/gJZJtP_W . > > When I started in 1957, I knew no one else who was doing neural networks. > That is why my colleagues call me the Father of AI. > > I then worked hard to create a neural networks community, notably a > research center, academic department, the International Neural Network > Society, the journal Neural Networks, multiple international conferences on > neural networks, and Boston-area research centers, while training over 100 > gifted PhD students, postdocs, and faculty to do neural network research. > See the Wikipedia page. > > That is why I did not have time or strength to fight for priority of my > models. > > Recently, I was able to provide a self-contained and non-technical > overview and synthesis of some of my scientific discoveries since 1957, as > well as explanations of the work of many other scientists, in my 2021 > Magnum Opus > > Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind > > https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON > FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HINTON > > Here I summarize my concerns about the Hinton award. > > Many authors developed Back Propagation (BP) before Hinton; e.g., Amari > (1967), Werbos (1974), Parker (1982), all before Rumelhart, Hinton, & > Williams (1986). > > BP has serious computational weaknesses: > > It is UNTRUSTWORTHY (because it is UNEXPLAINABLE). > > It is UNRELIABLE (because it can experience CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING. > > It should thus never be used in financial or medical applications. > > BP learning is also SLOW and uses non-biological NONLOCAL WEIGHT TRANSPORT. > > See Figure, right column, top. > > In 1988, I published 17 computational problems of BP: > https://lnkd.in/erKJvXFA > > BP gradually grew out of favor because other models were better. > > Later, huge online databases and supercomputers enabled Deep Learning to > use BP to learn. > > My 1988 article contrasted BP with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) which I > first published in 1976: > https://lnkd.in/evkfq22G > > See Figure, right column, bottom. > > ART never had BP’s problems. > > ART is now the most advanced cognitive and neural theory that explains HOW > HUMANS LEARN TO ATTEND, RECOGNIZE, and PREDICT events in a changing world. > > ART also explains and simulates data from hundreds of psychological and > neurobiological experiments. > > In 1980, I derived ART from a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT about how ANY system can > AUTONOMOUSLY learn to correct predictive errors in a changing world: > https://lnkd.in/eGWE8kJg > > The thought experiment derives ART from a few facts of life that do not > mention mind or brain. > > ART is thus a UNIVERSAL solution of the problem of autonomous error > correction in a changing world. > > That is why ART models can be used in designs for AUTONOMOUS ADAPTIVE > INTELLIGENCE in engineering, technology, and AI. > > ART also proposes a solution of the classical MIND-BODY PROBLEM: > > HOW, WHERE in our brains, and WHY from a deep computational perspective, > we CONSCIOUSLY SEE, HEAR, FEEL, and KNOW about the world, and use our > conscious states to PLAN and ACT to realize VALUED GOALS. > > For details, see > > Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind > > https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Comp-neuro mailing list -- comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org > Mailing list webpage (to subscribe or view archives): > https://www.cnsorg.org/comp-neuro-mailing-list > > To contact admin/moderators, send an email to: > comp-neuro-owner(a)lists.cnsorg.org > To unsubscribe, send an email to comp-neuro-leave(a)lists.cnsorg.org > >

Oct. 22, 2024

[Deadline Nov. 1st][Call for Data & Papers] 2nd International Whole Brain Architecture Workshop (Feb. 24th, 2025)

by Hiroshi Yamakawa

Dear Colleagues, << Abstract submission site is now open; data paper templates are available! >> We are pleased to announce the Second International Whole Brain Architecture Workshop, building on the remarkable success of our inaugural event. (The first online workshop, held in July 2024, attracted over 100 participants and generated significant enthusiasm in the field.) This second workshop will be held on February 24th, 2025 ( https://wba-initiative.org/en/24521/ ). Registration for presentations opens on October 20th, 2024, and we eagerly anticipate your submissions of BRA data. About This Workshop: The development of brain-inspired artificial intelligence, which aims to understand and simulate the computational functions of the brain, is a promising approach to reproducing human-like problem-solving abilities. This ambitious goal requires knowledge from diverse research fields, including neuroscience and cognitive science. Given the vast amount of knowledge needed, it is crucial to accumulate and share standardized design information as open knowledge. This workshop serves as a platform for cooperation and sharing of standardized design information (BRA data) essential for developing brain-inspired AI. Additionally, it provides an opportunity to enhance the academic value of submitted datasets through expert discussions and peer review. Why Participate: • Contribute to the cutting-edge field of brain-inspired AI • Share your research with a global audience of experts • Gain insights from interdisciplinary discussions • Potential for your work to be published on the BRA Editorial System (BRAES) https://ggle.io/6ybj • Access to standardized data paper templates to ensure high-quality submissions We invite submissions of BRA data and accompanying papers. Accepted data and papers will be published on BRAES, with paper DOIs shared on the workshop program page. We believe that this sharing and integration of brain-inspired AI design information will significantly advance the field. Date and Location (hybrid): • Date: February 24th, 2025 (Monday) • Venue: Tokyo, Japan (on-site) and online (details TBA) Important Dates: • BRA Data submission opens: October 20th, 2024 (JST) • Paper abstract submission deadline: November 1st, 2024 (JST) • BRA Data submission deadline: December 20th, 2024 (JST) • Full Paper submission deadline: January 4th, 2025 (JST) • Completed BRA Data submission deadline: January 4th, 2025 (JST) • Paper notification: January 24th, 2025 (JST) New Updates: The submission site for data paper abstracts is now open and accessible at https://ggle.io/79e3 The data paper template is now available for download at https://ggle.io/79e5 For detailed submission guidelines, please visit: https://wba-initiative.org/en/24521/ We look forward to welcoming you and your colleagues to present data and papers and to engage in stimulating discussions that will shape the future of brain-inspired AI. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact the Workshop organizers at bra-support(a)wba-initiative.org. Join us in advancing the frontier of brain-inspired artificial intelligence! Best regards, BRA Support Team

Oct. 22, 2024

Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton

by Grossberg, Stephen

Dear Sara, I reply below to your claims. From: Sara A. Solla <sasolla(a)gmail.com> Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 at 5:12 PM To: Grossberg, Stephen <steve(a)bu.edu> Cc: André Fabio Kohn via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org>, Stephen Grossberg <steve(a)cns.bu.edu> Subject: Re: [Comp-neuro] Re: Some scientific history that I experienced relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton You don't often get email from sasolla(a)gmail.com. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Stephen, You have been complaining about not getting enough credit since I first met you in the mid 1980s. That is not true. You refer to publishing before Hopfield's 1984 paper. You deliberately ignore his 1982 paper, which received 27946 citations: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, JJ Hopfield PNAS, April 15, 1982, 79 (8) 2554-2558 My post was originally on a web site with strict word limits. That is why I mentioned Hopfield’s 1984 article, but not his 1982 article. Section 6 of my 1988 review article: Grossberg, S. (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures. Neural Networks, 1 , 17-61. https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1988NN.pdf reviews Binary, Linear, and Continuous-Nonlinear classical neural network models by many authors. This article has been cited 2410 times. Section 6 shows that the 1982 equation that Hopfield used is a variant of the 1943 McCulloch-Pitts model. The Liapunov function for it is just a discrete version of the Liapunov function for the Additive Model. In contrast, the 1971 student paper you mentioned received 118 citations. I assume that you mean: Grossberg, S. (1971). Embedding fields: Underlying philosophy, mathematics, and applications to psychology, physiology, and anatomy. Journal of Cybernetics, 1, 28-50. https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971JoC.pdf This was a review article published in a journal that ceased to exist in 1980 (see below) and thus could not be searched well by Google, which began in 1998. The article discussed Generalized Additive Models (see its Section 6). I was able to get articles published proving global limit and oscillation theorems for Generalized Additive Models in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences between 1967 and 1971; e.g., Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831. https://sites.bu.edu/steveg/files/2016/06/Gro1971ProNatAcaSci.pdf See Equations 1, 2, 3, and 4 etc. Your 1983 paper with Michael Cohen in IEEE Transaction of Man, Systems, and Cybernetics was received on August 1, 1982, several months after the 1982 paper by Hopfeld had appeared in print. You did get a good number of citations on this paper, 3344, but not as good as 27946. Michael Cohen and I tried to submit it to the Journal of Cybernetics in 1980. But there was a glitch in the submission process due to the fact that the Journal of Cybernetics unexpectedly stopped publishing that year and our article got lost in the shuffle, unknown to us for a while. We resubmitted in 1982, which is why it was published in 1983. Our results pre-dated Hopfield 1982 and 1984 by two years. About the difference in citations: There is a difference between discovery and marketing. I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before and with Michael Cohen before he went around the country lecturing about work that we had previously published, without citation. You mention a 1982 paper with Michael Cohen; I have not been able to find it. I think that was a typo. Michael published the following article in 1992: Cohen, M. A. (1992). The construction of arbitrary stable dynamics in nonlinear neural networks. Neural Networks, 5, 83 – 103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0893608005800085 Here is the Abstract: “In this paper, two methods for constructing systems of ordinary differential equations realizing any fixed finite set of equilibria in any fixed finite dimension are introduced; no spurious equilibria are possible for either method. By using the first method, one can construct a system with the fewest number of equilibria, given a fixed set of attractors. Using a strict Lyapunov function [boldface mine] for each of these differential equations, a large class of systems with the same set of equilibria is constructed. A method of fitting these nonlinear systems to trajectories is proposed. In addition, a general method which will produce an arbitrary number of periodic orbits of shapes of arbitrary complexity is also discussed. A more general second method is given to construct a differential equation which converges to a fixed given finite set of equilibria. This technique is much more general in that it allows this set of equilibria to have any of a large class of indices which are consistent with the Morse Inequalities. It is clear that this class is not universal, because there is a large class of additional vector fields with convergent dynamics which cannot be constructed by the above method. The easiest way to see this is to enumerate the set of Morse indices which can be obtained by the above method and compare this class with the class of Morse indices of arbitrary differential equations with convergent dynamics. The former set of indices are a proper subclass of the latter, therefore, the above construction cannot be universal. In general, it is a difficult open problem to construct a specific example of a differential equation with a given fixed set of equilibria, permissible Morse indices, and permissible connections between stable and unstable manifolds. A strict Lyapunov function is given for this second case as well. This strict Lyapunov function [boldface mine] as above enables construction of a large class of examples consistent with these more complicated dynamics and indices. The determination of all the basins of attraction in the general case for these systems is also difficult and open.” I have never heard anybody referring to you as 'the father of AI'. As an acolyte of Hopfield, you wouldn’t. What I do remember is a visit to your group at BU many, many years ago - in the late 80s or early 90s. I was amazed at finding out that you closely supervised every word in every slide that anybody in your group was allowed to show when invited to give a talk. Everybody was under a lot of pressure to 'stay on message', where the 'message' was your view on things. I had never encountered a scientific group run as a cult. It made an impression, but not a positive one. So much for training over 100 people - by teaching them not to think by themselves. You describe my devoted teaching as something ugly, even ad hominem. When I was a student, no one told me how to write an article or how to prepare and give a talk or poster. I developed a method to enable my students to grow intellectually and become independent scholars. When I started working with a new PhD student or postdoc, we discussed what topics would potentially interest them. Then we read hundreds of psychological and neurobiological articles together about that topic and began to discuss the results in them. For students interested in engineering and AI, we studied all the methods that were available to solve problems in a targeted problem domain. I encouraged my students to advance their own concepts about what might be the underlying mechanisms that generated an article’s data or benchmarks. Because we studied large amounts of data, favorite concepts often hit a brick wall and had to be discarded. We developed a modeling method that I like to call the Method of Minimal Anatomies. See Figure 2.37 in my 2021 Magnum Opus https://www.amazon.com/Conscious-Mind-Resonant-Brain-Makes/dp/0190070552 This Method is just Occam’s Razor applied to neural networks. As the Figure summarizes, it “Operationalizes the proper level of abstraction” and “that you cannot ‘derive a brain’ in one step”. Our models have been getting incrementally developed in a principled way to the present time. Your statement that “the message was your [my] view on things” is the opposite of how we worked. And how would you know? You were not there. The proof of the pudding is that all my students got positions that they wanted after they earned their PhD’s with me. I was also told by multiple famous scientists that our department sent them their best postdoctoral fellows. In fact, various major labs would contact me to let me know that they had an open position and asked if one of my students was about to graduate. My students have gone on to successful careers after their postdocs and other first post-PhD positions. Around half of them went into academe, and the other half into engineering, technology, and AI. Groups of us have periodically gotten together for happy social events, either at international conferences or in the Boston area. And they sent me information about their accomplishments and growing families for many years. As for back-propagation, this is not what Hinton is cited for in the Nobel Prize citation. It is for the Boltzmann machine. Yes, I know that, and I have also noted that my PhD student, James Williamson, developed statistical neural network models that did not have problems related to deep Learning. I have elsewhere noted that: Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMS) also have analogs in the Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) family of models, but without the problems that follow from using variants of Deep Learning. Here are two of them, both developed by my PhD student, James R. Williamson: Gaussian ARTMAP: A Neural Network for Fast Incremental Learning of Noisy Multidimensional Maps https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0893608095001158 A Constructive, Incremental Learning Network for Mixture Modeling and Classification http://techlab.bu.edu/files/resources/articles_tt/A%20constructive,%20incre… Finally, I always wondered: If ART solves all problems, why are there ML/AI problems that remain to be solved? I would never claim that. I have always taught that science is never done. See the Method of Minimal Anatomies. The fact that you can even think that about my work shows, sad to say, how biased you have become. On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 7:49 AM Grossberg, Stephen via Comp-neuro <comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro@lists.cnsorg.org>> wrote: Dear Comp-neuro colleagues, Here are some short summaries of the history of neural network discoveries, as I experienced it, that are relevant to the recent Nobel Prizes to Hopfield and Hinton: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++THETHE THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HOPFIELD Here I summarize my concerns about the Hopfield award. I published articles in 1967 – 1972 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that introduced the Additive Model that Hopfield used in 1984. My articles proved global theorems about the limits and oscillations of my Generalized Additive Models. See sites.bu.edu/steveg<http://sites.bu.edu/steveg> for these articles. For example: Grossberg, S. (1971). Pavlovian pattern learning by nonlinear neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 828-831. https://lnkd.in/emzwx4Tw This article illustrates that my mathematical results were part of a research program to develop biological neural networks that provide principled mechanistic explanations of psychological and neurobiological data. Later, Michael Cohen and I published a Liapunov function that included the Additive Model and generalizations thereof in 1982 and 1983 before Hopfield (1984) appeared. For example, Cohen, M.A. and Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 815-826. https://lnkd.in/eAFAdvbu I was told that Hopfield knew about my work before he published his 1984 article, without citation. Recall that I started my neural networks research in 1957 as a Freshman at Dartmouth College. That year, I introduced the biological neural network paradigm, as well as the short-term memory (STM), medium-term memory (MTM), and long-term memory (LTM) laws that are used to this day, including in the Additive Model, to explain data about how brains make minds. See the review in https://lnkd.in/gJZJtP_W . When I started in 1957, I knew no one else who was doing neural networks. That is why my colleagues call me the Father of AI. I then worked hard to create a neural networks community, notably a research center, academic department, the International Neural Network Society, the journal Neural Networks, multiple international conferences on neural networks, and Boston-area research centers, while training over 100 gifted PhD students, postdocs, and faculty to do neural network research. See the Wikipedia page. That is why I did not have time or strength to fight for priority of my models. Recently, I was able to provide a self-contained and non-technical overview and synthesis of some of my scientific discoveries since 1957, as well as explanations of the work of many other scientists, in my 2021 Magnum Opus Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ THE NOBEL PRIZES IN PHYSICS TO HOPFIELD AND HINTON FOR MODELS THEY DID NOT DISCOVER: THE CASE OF HINTON Here I summarize my concerns about the Hinton award. Many authors developed Back Propagation (BP) before Hinton; e.g., Amari (1967), Werbos (1974), Parker (1982), all before Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams (1986). BP has serious computational weaknesses: It is UNTRUSTWORTHY (because it is UNEXPLAINABLE). It is UNRELIABLE (because it can experience CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING. It should thus never be used in financial or medical applications. BP learning is also SLOW and uses non-biological NONLOCAL WEIGHT TRANSPORT. See Figure, right column, top. In 1988, I published 17 computational problems of BP: https://lnkd.in/erKJvXFA BP gradually grew out of favor because other models were better. Later, huge online databases and supercomputers enabled Deep Learning to use BP to learn. My 1988 article contrasted BP with Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) which I first published in 1976: https://lnkd.in/evkfq22G See Figure, right column, bottom. ART never had BP’s problems. ART is now the most advanced cognitive and neural theory that explains HOW HUMANS LEARN TO ATTEND, RECOGNIZE, and PREDICT events in a changing world. ART also explains and simulates data from hundreds of psychological and neurobiological experiments. In 1980, I derived ART from a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT about how ANY system can AUTONOMOUSLY learn to correct predictive errors in a changing world: https://lnkd.in/eGWE8kJg The thought experiment derives ART from a few facts of life that do not mention mind or brain. ART is thus a UNIVERSAL solution of the problem of autonomous error correction in a changing world. That is why ART models can be used in designs for AUTONOMOUS ADAPTIVE INTELLIGENCE in engineering, technology, and AI. ART also proposes a solution of the classical MIND-BODY PROBLEM: HOW, WHERE in our brains, and WHY from a deep computational perspective, we CONSCIOUSLY SEE, HEAR, FEEL, and KNOW about the world, and use our conscious states to PLAN and ACT to realize VALUED GOALS. For details, see Conscious Mind, Resonant Brain: How Each Brain Makes a Mind https://lnkd.in/eiJh4Ti +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ _______________________________________________ Comp-neuro mailing list -- comp-neuro(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro@lists.cnsorg.org> Mailing list webpage (to subscribe or view archives): https://www.cnsorg.org/comp-neuro-mailing-list To contact admin/moderators, send an email to: comp-neuro-owner(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro-owner@lists.cnsorg.org> To unsubscribe, send an email to comp-neuro-leave(a)lists.cnsorg.org<mailto:comp-neuro-leave@lists.cnsorg.org>

Oct. 21, 2024